Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!
12 angry men
JaQualyn
Created on March 19, 2024
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
Transcript
Shattered Illusions
The truth about tammy and unreliable sources
Start
Dr. charles smith who was considered a expert on criminally suspitious pediatric deaths, conducted the autospy and concluded Kenneth was strangled or smothered. Tammy was accused of smothering her child, her defense was he died during a epileptic seizure but had no medical expert to support this theory. Tammy was then convicted of second degree murder in 1995 for the 1993 death of her 2 year old son, Kenneth. She was then sentenced to life in prison without the possiblity for parole for 10 years.
What?
Accusations
Who?
who are you
Tammy marquardt was a young mother who tragically checked on her son napping to see him struggling in sheets to breath. In her panic she wasn't able to follow the 911 operators instuctions on CPR. Kenneth was revived at the hospital but it was concluded he had irreparable brain damage and was taken off life support 3 days later resulting in his death.
The crime took place in the bedroom where Kenneth was napping on October 9, 1993 in oshawa, Ontario
Where&When?
Dr. charles smith who was considered a expert on criminally suspitious pediatric deaths, conducted the autospy. Concluding it wasn't a accident, Kenneth was strangled or smothered. Tammy was arrested not even 2 months after her loss
Why?
No Tammy NO
Unqualified For Position
He went to school for disease not forensics
Wrongfull convictions of Smith
Other Cases
Lianne Gagnon
Failed attempt
Louise Reynolds1999
Dinesh Kumar
1992
William Mullins-Johnson
1993
How?
As early as 1991 there was concerns regarding Smiths' professional competense. As time went on he continued to gain a bad reputation. In 2004, Tammy applied AIDWYC (The assosiation in dfense of the wrongly convicted. They urged a full public inquiry into smith's work. Kenneths case was looked into and deemed "illogical and completely against scientific evidence based reasoning" by other professionals
12 Angry men
This relates...
By both cases having a lack of reliable witnesses and evidence resulting to conclusion jumping and bad views from peers.
Life lessons
This case teaches us how to overcome obsacles of false accusations, by never conformining to what everyone believed