Primary v. Secondary (Empirical)
Theresa Olson
Created on November 21, 2023
More creations to inspire you
SLYCE DECK
Personalized
LET’S GO TO LONDON!
Personalized
ENERGY KEY ACHIEVEMENTS
Personalized
HUMAN AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT KEY
Personalized
CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ART KEY ACHIEVEMENTS
Personalized
DOWNFALLL OF ARAB RULE IN AL-ANDALUS
Personalized
ABOUT THE EEA GRANTS AND NORWAY
Personalized
Transcript
Primary or Secondary?
Answer the questions to see where your research article best fits.
Start
Did the authors of the article gather their own data?
Click to learn more about what this means.
No
I'm not sure
Yes
Did the authors of the article analyze raw data for thefirst time?
No
I'm not sure
Yes
Click to learn more about what this means.
Is the resource you're looking at considered a Clinical Guideline?
No
I'm not sure
Yes
Click to learn more about what this means.
Does the resource identify itself in any of the following ways:
No
I'm not sure
Yes
Randomized Controlled Trial, Case Study, Cohort Study, Survey Research, Retrospective Study, Clinical trial.
Does the resource identify itself in any of the following ways:
No
I'm not sure
Yes
Literature Review, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Patient education information,Book Chapter
This is likely a primary source.
Try again
This is likely asecondary source.
Try again
We're stumped.
Try again
Try reaching out to your professor, or email the library at reference@maryville.edu
Clinical Guidelines
Clinical Guidelines provide a summary of existing literature to aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating illness. No experiments are performed or data gathered, and the documents make use of existing literature to draw conclusions.Articles from point-of-care tools like UpToDate or StatPearls are Clinical Guidelines.
"Gather their own data"
Look at the methods section of the article.*
- Did the authors of the article conduct an experiment?
- Did they send out a survey to gather information from a population?
- Did the authors work with human subjects to test a hypothesis?
- Is there any other evidence that the authors designed and conducted an experiment or study that involved some kind of activity other than reading and synthesizing existing research?
*Don't see a methods section? There's a good chance the authors didn't gather their own data.
aka Retrospective Studies
Raw Data Analysis
Primary sources can also take the form of Retrospective Studies. Retrospective Studies involve analyzing existing data (i.e. from a medical records system).This is common for studies that deal with topics that would be unethical to perform experiments to test. (Examples: using existing patient data to chart how diseases spread, or studying data about Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.)