This article by Cassandra Scharber was published in the journal Library Review in 2009. It examines two public-library-based online book clubs for preteens and teens The article found that the book clubs were fun and engaging. It was a great way to promote literacy and encourage discussion. Scharber argues that online book clubs offer a number of advantages over traditional in-person book clubs. She concludes by suggesting that libraries can play an important role in promoting online book clubs and making them accessible.
Online Book Clubs for Preteens and Teens
The findings were both statistically and practically significant. In this case, Scharber found that online book clubs had a positive impact on participants' literacy skills and their enjoyment of reading. This is statistically signficiant, meaning that the findings were likely to be generalizable to other populations. It was practically significant because the findings suggest that online book clubs can be an effective way to promote literacy and encourage discussion of books among preteens and teens. This means the results of the study have implications for real-world practice.
Did the findings prove both statistically and practically significant? Why or why not?