Realism - IR
VANESSA MARCONCINI
Created on October 27, 2023
Over 30 million people build interactive content in Genially.
Check out what others have designed:
LAS ESPECIES ANIMALES MÁS AMENAZADAS
Presentation
WATER PRESERVATION
Presentation
BIDEN’S CABINET
Presentation
YURI GAGARIN IN DENMARK
Presentation
C2C VOLUNTEER ORIENTATION
Presentation
TALK ABOUT DYS WITH TEACHER
Presentation
CIRQUE DU SOLEIL
Presentation
Transcript
Ética e Relações Internacionais
31/10/2023
Authors: Albert Cristian Maties Vanessa Marconcini
Realism
“Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
Thucydides
02. Thucydides
01. Introduction
05. Classical Realism
04. Hobbes
03. Machiavelli
08. Neorealism
09. Waltz
10. Conclusions
11. Bibliography
07. Morgenthau
06. E.H. Carr
Index
01. Introduction
One of the general theories in International Relations.It is usually contrasted with Idealism or Liberalism.
Realism
Realism had changed as the years go by.Founding fathers: Thucydides, Machiavelli and HobbesWe can distinguish between Classical Realism and Neorealism, which has replaced the first one with a more scientific approach to study International Relations.
International Relations are a self-help system in which there is not a superior entity to regulate interactions
Anarchy
01. Main features of Realism
Realists consider human beings egoistic and self-interested
Human nature
Realists are skeptical regarding the relevance of ethical norms in International Relations, among States
Ethical norms
States' actions are influeced by their interests. For realists, States are concerned with their own security
States' interests
Realists consider States as the principal actors in International Relations
States
Morality can be perfected within the tight bounds of a well-crafted community, but can never extend farther, at least to any meaningful degree
Read more
02. Thucydides
Is not simply a matter of balancing material interests; the attainment of moral community is intrinsically valuable, a measure of high civilization.
4. The integrity of the community
Saw politics as involving in moral questions, and the power as a crucial element that can also be guided by the norms of justice
3. It is utopian to ignore the reality of power in international relations, but it is equally blind to rely on power alone
2. For him realism competes with ethical concern in an irresolvable tension.
His work was the first recorded political and moral analysis of a nation’s war policies. Thucydides' analysis systematically blocks taking a "just war" approach to the origins of the Peloponnesian War.
1. Peloponnesian War
Thucydides was the greatest of ancient Greek historians and author of the History of the Peloponnesian War, about the struggle between Athens and Sparta in the 5th century BC.
03. Machiavelli
- Critique of classical Western political thought as unrealistic
- Separation of ethics from politics
- He replaces the ancient virtue with virtù
- Ragione di Stato and morality in politics
- Concept of double ethics
Machiavelli was born in the 15th century in Italy. The. main idea in politics was that politics itself should be virtuous and the methods of warfare should be subordinated to ethical standards.Machiavelli defines himself as a political innovator:
State of Nature
He derives his notion of the state of war from his views of both human nature and the condition in which individuals exist. Since in the state of nature there is no government and everyone enjoys equal status, every individual has a right to everything; that is, there are no constraints on an individual’s behavior.
04.
International Relations
His approach to international relations is prudential and pacific: sovereign states, like individuals, should be disposed towards peace which is commended by reason. International rules will often prove ineffective in restraining the struggle for power. States will interpret them to their own advantage.International relations will always tend to be a precarious affair. This grim view of global politics lies at the core of Hobbes’s realism.
Hobbes
05. Classical Realism
Important Authors
- John H. Herz
- Hans Morgenthau
- George Kennan
- Raymond Aron
- E. H. Carr
Idealist perspective
The Classical Realism of the 20th Century was born in response to the liberalist, or idealist, perspective after the First World War
Read more
Read more
06. E. H. Carr
4. Human beings need universally aknowledged norms and values
Policy of appeasement
3. The way to obrain peace is to satisfy the unsatisfied powers, making concessions
2. Doctrine of the harmony of interests vs the reality of conflict of interests
There are neither universal values nor universal interests
1. "Morality can only be relative, not universal"
Critique to the idealist position
Politics cannot be subordinated to ethics
Autonomous sphere
Defined as power is a universally valid category
Interest
07. Morgenthau
He developed realism into a comprehensive international relations theory. He places selfishness and power-lust at the center of his picture of human existence.
All state actors must be looked at solely as political entities pursuing their respective interests defined in terms of power.
Prudence
Tension between morality and the requirements of successful political action
Relationship between realism and ethics
Political leaders think and act in terms of interest defined as power.
Autonomy of politics
Realism is based on objective laws that have their roots in unchanging human nature
Objective laws
Morgenthau systematizes realism in international relations on the basis of six principles
08.
Neorealism
Neorealism was an attempt to develop a more scientific and methodologically rigorous approach explain International Relations.The International Relations discipline has been divided into two main strands:- Traditional or non-positivist: normative questions, history, philosophy, and law- Scientific or positivist: descriptive approach
09. Kenneth Waltz
Anarchy: principle of the international systemStates: units of the international systemSecurity: fundamental interest of each stateInsecurity and unequal gains
Structural realism or neorealism
- Avoid discussions on human nature
- Theory on International Relations analogous to microeconomics
- Not applied to domestic politics
10. Conclusions
- It warns us against progressivism, moralism, legalism, and other orientations that lose touch with the reality of self-interest and power.
2. Useful cautionary role
- It depends on the actual historical and political conditions.
1. Realism is more than a static theory
- By remaining stuck in a state-centric and excessively simplified “paradigm” such as neorealism and by denying the possibility of any progress in interstate relations
3. Ideology
Classical Realism
Was a theory aimed at supporting diplomatic practice and providing a guide to be followed by those seeking to understand and deal with potential threats.
Kenneth Waltz
"States in the world are like individuals in the state of nature. They are neither perfectly good nor are they controlled by law."
- Steven Ford, Chapter 4 in "Traditions of International Ethics, by T. Nardin and D. R. Mapel
Classical Realism
- Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/realism-intl-relations/>
Political Realism in International Relations
11.
Bibliography
Albert Cristian Maties Vanessa Marconcini
Thanksfor your attention
Melian Dialogue
Peloponnesian war is an exploration of the place of ethics in international politics. The “Melian Dialogue”, presents the classic debate between the idealist and realist views: Can international politics be based on a moral order derived from the principles of justice, or will it forever remain the arena of conflicting national interests and power?
- Melians trust in alliances.
- Athenians overestimate their strength and in the end lose the war.
- Spartans persue they own interests and declaim about justice only when is to their advantage
Politicians
Politicians use the language of justice to cloak the particular interests of their own countries.Policies are not based on universal norms, independent of iterests of the parties involved, as the idealists affirm.
Power
- The world is torn apart by the interests of different groups
- Order is based on power
- Morality is a product of power
- International moral norms are imposed on countries by other dominant nations