Decision 1: Meeting in the Renovated Building
Prompt: Which of the following actions best reflects the reasonable accommodation strategy?
C) Install a temporary and portable ramp (that does not impose a disproportionate burden) for the three steps, ensuring the employee's participation at the planned location.
Options:
A) Relocate the meeting to the modern, accessible building across town to avoid the problem entirely.
B) Propose hiring an assistant to accompany the employee to the ground floor whenever they need to use the restroom.
Decision 2: Confronting the Model
Prompt: A colleague in HR suggests that, to improve the productivity of employees with disabilities, they should focus on sending new hires to "correction courses" so they can better adapt to the "standard" workplace culture. What model of disability underlies the colleague's suggestion and why should it be rejected from an inclusion perspective?
It is based on the Social and Rights Model, which promotes the "normalization" of the person with a disability.
Options:
It is based on the Charity Model, as it sees the person as dependent and in need of being "fixed" to deserve a position.
It is based on the Medical-Rehabilitation Model, which demands that the person "strive to correct the deviation from the norm and thus adapt to society."
Entscheidung 3: Kommunikationsbarrieren
Einen Monat später erwähnt Klaas, dass er Schwierigkeiten hat, Schritt zu halten. Sie haben ein internes Richtlinienhandbuch entwickelt, befürchten aber, dass seine komplexe Sprache als strukturelle Barriere für Menschen mit geistigen oder psychosozialen Behinderungen wirken könnte. Um kognitive Zugänglichkeit zu gewährleisten, welche Strategie priorisiert Verstehen und Interaktion für alle?
Offer the manual in Braille and Sign Language to meet minimum accessibility standards.
Optionen:
A) Das Handbuch verteilen wie es ist, aber eine Frage-und-Antwort-Sitzung mit einem Experten anbieten.
B) Das Handbuch in das Leichte-Lesen-Format übersetzen, unter Verwendung von Piktogrammen oder anderen unterstützenden Kommunikationssystemen.
Conclusion Slide
Well done! You’ve navigated a real-world inclusion journey. Even if not every choice was perfect, you’ve explored the complexities of inclusive decision-making. Inclusion is a continuous process — every choice counts.
Reflect: What could you apply from this in your own organisation?
C (Beste Option): Dies gilt als angemessene Vorkehrung. Es ist eine spezifische und notwendige Modifikation, die sicherstellt, dass der Mitarbeiter gleichberechtigt mit anderen vollen Zugang zur physischen Umgebung hat, ohne eine unverhältnismäßige Last aufzuerlegen.
❌ The Social and Rights Model has as its fundamental premise that society must adapt to the needs of its citizens, focusing on capabilities and functionality. This model is the opposite of the "normalization" of the individual.
❌ The Charity Model focuses on dependence and shame, seeking a cure, but the focus on "correction and adaptation" is more characteristic of the Medical Model.
B: This would place the burden on Klaas, limiting their autonomy, and approaches a solution based on charity or dependence.
❌ While Braille and Sign Language are essential for sensory disabilities (visual and auditory), cognitive accessibility specifically refers to enabling easy understanding, communication, and interaction.
✅ (Best Option): Universal Accessibility includes cognitive accessibility, which is made effective through easy reading, pictograms, and other human and technological means. This ensures that the content is understandable, usable, and operable by all people.
❌ While useful, it places the burden of comprehension on the employee and does not address the accessibility problem of the document itself.
✅(Best Option): The Medical-Rehabilitation or Individual Model sees disability as a defective or deficient body and attributes problems to the individual. The "solution" it proposes is cure, rehabilitation, or "normalization" of the person. Inclusion, in contrast, promotes changing the context to welcome the person, not the other way around (Inclusion vs. Integration).
A: Obwohl dies das Problem löst, muss eine angemessene Vorkehrung die spezifische und notwendige Modifikation in einem bestimmten Fall sein, wenn universelles Design nicht ausreicht. Eine vollständige Ortsänderung könnte unverhältnismäßig oder unnötig sein, wenn eine einfachere Lösung existiert.
Decision Tree Activity MOD 1
FIP
Created on June 23, 2026
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Essential Map
View
Akihabara Map
View
Discover Your AI Assistant
View
School Year Calendar
View
Academic calendar
View
School calendar
View
Higher Education Academic Calendar
Explore all templates
Transcript
Decision 1: Meeting in the Renovated Building
Prompt: Which of the following actions best reflects the reasonable accommodation strategy?
C) Install a temporary and portable ramp (that does not impose a disproportionate burden) for the three steps, ensuring the employee's participation at the planned location.
Options:
A) Relocate the meeting to the modern, accessible building across town to avoid the problem entirely.
B) Propose hiring an assistant to accompany the employee to the ground floor whenever they need to use the restroom.
Decision 2: Confronting the Model
Prompt: A colleague in HR suggests that, to improve the productivity of employees with disabilities, they should focus on sending new hires to "correction courses" so they can better adapt to the "standard" workplace culture. What model of disability underlies the colleague's suggestion and why should it be rejected from an inclusion perspective?
It is based on the Social and Rights Model, which promotes the "normalization" of the person with a disability.
Options:
It is based on the Charity Model, as it sees the person as dependent and in need of being "fixed" to deserve a position.
It is based on the Medical-Rehabilitation Model, which demands that the person "strive to correct the deviation from the norm and thus adapt to society."
Entscheidung 3: Kommunikationsbarrieren
Einen Monat später erwähnt Klaas, dass er Schwierigkeiten hat, Schritt zu halten. Sie haben ein internes Richtlinienhandbuch entwickelt, befürchten aber, dass seine komplexe Sprache als strukturelle Barriere für Menschen mit geistigen oder psychosozialen Behinderungen wirken könnte. Um kognitive Zugänglichkeit zu gewährleisten, welche Strategie priorisiert Verstehen und Interaktion für alle?
Offer the manual in Braille and Sign Language to meet minimum accessibility standards.
Optionen:
A) Das Handbuch verteilen wie es ist, aber eine Frage-und-Antwort-Sitzung mit einem Experten anbieten.
B) Das Handbuch in das Leichte-Lesen-Format übersetzen, unter Verwendung von Piktogrammen oder anderen unterstützenden Kommunikationssystemen.
Conclusion Slide
Well done! You’ve navigated a real-world inclusion journey. Even if not every choice was perfect, you’ve explored the complexities of inclusive decision-making. Inclusion is a continuous process — every choice counts. Reflect: What could you apply from this in your own organisation?
C (Beste Option): Dies gilt als angemessene Vorkehrung. Es ist eine spezifische und notwendige Modifikation, die sicherstellt, dass der Mitarbeiter gleichberechtigt mit anderen vollen Zugang zur physischen Umgebung hat, ohne eine unverhältnismäßige Last aufzuerlegen.
❌ The Social and Rights Model has as its fundamental premise that society must adapt to the needs of its citizens, focusing on capabilities and functionality. This model is the opposite of the "normalization" of the individual.
❌ The Charity Model focuses on dependence and shame, seeking a cure, but the focus on "correction and adaptation" is more characteristic of the Medical Model.
B: This would place the burden on Klaas, limiting their autonomy, and approaches a solution based on charity or dependence.
❌ While Braille and Sign Language are essential for sensory disabilities (visual and auditory), cognitive accessibility specifically refers to enabling easy understanding, communication, and interaction.
✅ (Best Option): Universal Accessibility includes cognitive accessibility, which is made effective through easy reading, pictograms, and other human and technological means. This ensures that the content is understandable, usable, and operable by all people.
❌ While useful, it places the burden of comprehension on the employee and does not address the accessibility problem of the document itself.
✅(Best Option): The Medical-Rehabilitation or Individual Model sees disability as a defective or deficient body and attributes problems to the individual. The "solution" it proposes is cure, rehabilitation, or "normalization" of the person. Inclusion, in contrast, promotes changing the context to welcome the person, not the other way around (Inclusion vs. Integration).
A: Obwohl dies das Problem löst, muss eine angemessene Vorkehrung die spezifische und notwendige Modifikation in einem bestimmten Fall sein, wenn universelles Design nicht ausreicht. Eine vollständige Ortsänderung könnte unverhältnismäßig oder unnötig sein, wenn eine einfachere Lösung existiert.