Bilan des conférences

Conferences: FEEDBACK

APRIL 21, 2026

table of contents

BACKGROUND & ORGANIZATION

• Communication Kits
• Calendar Invitations
• Emailings upstream/downstream

COMMUNICATION

CONTENT OF CONFERENCES

• Answers from participants

CONFERENCE EVALUATION RESULTS

• Feedback from evaluation questionnaires

participation

• Breakdown / number of participants FR
• Breakdown / number of participants EN

• Educational Tool
• Subtitled Replays
• Podcast

TOOLS

IN SUMMARY

APPENDIx

• Reported situations of sexism FR
• Reported situations of sexism EN

BACKGROUND & organization

background to conferences

The Fédération Nationale du Crédit Agricole and Companieros have been working together in a partnership for five years.Over the last two years, they have co-built an annual awareness plan dedicated to gender diversity. These two conferences were held as part of the #StOpE initiative signed by the Crédit Agricole Group on January 22, 2026. They were scheduled during Crédit Agricole Group’s Gender Diversity Week linked to the International Women's Day on 8th March.

format of conferences

ORGANIZATION

The two conferences lasted 1 hour each. We used the Mentimeter tool to facilitate interactions. The conference in French was moderated by Florence MASQUIN. The conference in English was moderated by Lucy de NOBLET.

Both conferences were open to all Crédit Agricole Group employees (Regional Banks, subsidiaries, entities). The remote format, via Teams, made it possible to bring together participants from all locations (Europe, Asia, America). One conference was held in French, another conference was held in English, on the same theme, simultaneously.

communication

communication kits

Two communication kits were produced: one in French, the other in English. Communication kits included: - a summary of the conference - the link to the conference registration questionnaire - the conference Teams link - graphic content: visuals, banners & design elements - a presentation by the speaker

communication

CALENDAR INVITATIONS

Crédit Agricole Group employees registered via separate questionnaires, in French or English. Every day, Companieros sent an invitation to the agenda of new registrants. N° of people registered for the conferences: 1,551 registrations for the session in French 299 for the English session.

Invitation template in English : Hello, Thank you for registering for the webconference on 12th March: “Men & Women: We’re all allies against sexism.” The event will take place via Teams from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. (Paris time). Here is the Teams link: XXXXX For your information, the meeting will be in English. Have a great day, The Companieros Team j.molton@companieros.com

communication

emailings

In total, 4 emails were sent to the registrants and/or participants of each conference.

downstream

upstream

W-1 before conferences: reminder to registrantsIn French: 858 people In English: 120 people D-Day: reminder to registrants In French: 1,315 people In English: 256 people

10 days after the conference: sending the evaluation questionnaire, subtitled replay & the educational tool To conference registrants & participants In French: 1,585 people, opening rate of 91.3% In English: 363 people, opening rate of 67.2% 1 month 1/2 after the conference: sending the podcast of conference, subtitled replay and educational tool To conference registrants & participants In French: coming soon In English: coming soon

CONTENT OF CONFERENCES

• self-positioning test "In the last two years, have you been the subject of sexist remarks?"
• definition of sexism and focus on everyday sexism
• why does this matter for organizations?
• sexist remarks and behaviours are a reality: #StOpE barometer figures
• the impacts of sexism on individuals and businesses
• sharing of real-life examples by participants
• legal definitions of sexist behaviour & sexual harassment
• the notion of cursor

courses OF CONFERENCES

1. "Sexism": what are we talking about?

2. Let's sharpen our discernment!

• anonymous practical cases via Mentimeter

• hot reaction
• cold reaction - the DISC method
• the company's reporting channels
• post-conference self-positioning test "In the last two years, have you been the subject of sexist remarks?"
• commitments

3. Some guidelines for action

ANSWERS FROM PARTICIPANTS

SELF-POSITIONING TESTS

The change in answers to the positioning tests is direct proof of the conference's impact.

In the last two years, have you been the subject of sexist remarks? An important change in answers following the explanations and examples given.

64%

36%

54%

46%

At the beginning of the conference in French, 54% of respondents indicated that they had been the subject of sexist remarks 64% for the conference in English.

83%

17%

72%

28%

At the end of the conference in French, 72% of respondents said they had been the subject of sexist remarks 83% for the conference in English. A significant change in answers following the explanations and examples given.

answers FROM PARTICIPANTS

EXAMPLES OF SEXIST REMARKS

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN frENCH

The evaluation questionaire collected feedback from those who attended the conference. It was sent at the end of the conference and then 10 days later.

Response rate: 14%

115 out of 812 people responded to the questionnaire.

I rate the quality of the content

Would you recommend this conference?

Answer "Yes" or "No"

8,84/10

98% of yes!

113 people recommend the conference.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN frENCH

What did you like about the conference? 1/2

Concrete examples/practical cases

Interaction/participation

Clarity/Training approach

54 occurences

32 occurences

20 occurences

• Concrete cases/examples

• Concrete cases with the means to react -thank you

• The amount of examples and systematic nuances
• All the cases evoked are revealing
• Precise examples, which recall certain realities of everyday life.

• Question + animation + support
• The presentation, the dynamism, the interactive quizzes
• The clarity of the words. The dynamism and interactivity of the format
• The plurality of examples presented
• The interactive side
• Examples given and interaction with participants
• The dynamic format, the diversity of topics, the possibility to ask questions live.

• The whole presentation, clear and illustrated
• Clear explanations
• Coaching to bring us to awareness
• Training, rhythm, tone and concrete examples
• Reminders of definitions and clear examples of situations
• Everything was very clear: the definitions and the examples provided were very interesting, to avoid any confusion.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN frENCH

What did you like about the conference? 2/2

Content/background

Quality of the speaker/animation

Organization/format

16 occurences

15 occurences

14 occurences

• It was good that this topic was discussed openly. It also "spilled over" into other corporate-related subjects which should be developed on
• The data on sexism

• I didn't really know what sexism was but through the examples, the questions and answers, I was able to understand what it was
• The treatment of the subject, in a non-militant way; the overall approach with concrete explanations on what is sexism, or not.

• Practice with all situations, dynamic presentation
• Excellent agency - clear, illustrated and dynamic presentation with interaction
• Simple, effective explanations and examples. Very clear speaker

• Clear, simple, dynamic, interactive conference
• The presentation was really captivating from start to finish. The intonation used was clear and pleasant, which made the speech easy to follow and never monotonous. We felt a certain ease that made you want to stay attentive. I sincerely wanted to listen until the end, without picking up, because the subject was well highlighted and presented in a lively way.

• Good format, we stay captivated
• Very good format
• Smooth exchanges, interesting
• Interactive format. Good presentation that can be reused
• Format, strong interaction.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN frENCH

What could be improved?

Audience

Duration

6 occurences

21 occurences

• Longer duration, to go further
• Maybe a little longer to answer questions
• Timing... too short
• More time to exchange
• The duration of the workshop should have been a little longer, in-depth exchanges.

• Bring more men to these conferences because it seems to me that women were in the majority
• Participation should be mandatory because participants are usually already aware of the subject, versus people who do not feel concerned do not participate and do not have the opportunity to change their mind or behaviour

• I think that this is a subject that should be addressed in a mandatory manner for all employees, or at least be the subject of more training. In fact, many people still do not clearly distinguish between a joke perceived as innocuous and sexist. This shows how important it is to continue to raise awareness and inform about this topic.

NTR quoted 32 times

Lack of depth

9 occurences

• Distinguishing the different types of sexism: benevolent, hostile... Many people don't understand the concept of benevolent sexism. I wish the event could have gone further (it was mainly a conference for novices)

• The topics discussed are a repetition, more useful for those who don't know about the topic

• Addressing everyday sexism in the workplace in greater depth.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN ENGLISH

The evaluation questionaire collects feedback from those who attended the conference. It was sent at the end of the conference and then 10 days later.

Response rate: 10%

24 out of 223 respondents responded to the questionnaire.

I rate the quality of the content of the conference

IWould you recommend this conference?

Answer "Yes" or "No"

9,37/10

100% of yes !

24 people recommend the conference.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN ENGLISH

What did you like about the conference?

Content / pedagogy

Practical & Actionable

Interactivity / Format

13 occurences

6 occurences

8 occurences

• Important topic with details
• The open approach with clear and direct communication
• Clear concepts expressed from a global perspective
• For clarity and awareness
• Interesting, useful, gives the materials to reflect on.

• Focused on practical experience and on every day actions to enable change
• Practical advice and everyday situations were explored
• Easy going, direct and with practical examples
• By highlighting borderline cases, it becomes possible to recognize and question grey areas and internalized everyday sexism.
• For the concreteness of the topics covered and the skill of Lucy De Noblet explanations. It was very interesting to participate.

• I enjoyed the active engagement without the need to speak, as well as the informative and friendly atmosphere.
• Interactive, succinct information provided
• Good structure, really liked the live survey during the presentation
• The conference was very detailed and clear. I am very grateful that you also included methods of countering and responding to sexist behavior! Also, I really enjoyed the interactive part of the webconference.

CONFERENCE Evaluation RESULTS

COnfErence IN ENGLISH

What could be improved?

Duration & Interaction

No improvement

Reach & Scaling the initiative

3 occurences

10 occurences

5 occurences

• Make it last half an hour longer
• Have a Q&A
• More concrete examples

• Spread more the awareness of this type of conference and find ways to get more people attending
• Make this topic compulsory for all colleagues
• Expand the reach, unfortunately in Drivalia most of the people didn't know about it
• To provide more conferences like this
• Nothing, this conference should be compulsory for everyone at the bank!

• Everything was Ok and clear
• Nothing that I can think of
• I think it was good as it is.

PARTICIPATION

COnfErence IN ENGLISH

COnfErence IN frENCH

Download the file by clicking here

Download the file by clicking here

TOOLS

THE EDUCATIONAL TOOL

We have developed a dedicated educational tool so that employees can go deeper on the topic. This educational tool aims to further clarify what is sexism in business and how to react in different circumstances and improve communication between employees. It consists of 3 parts: - Sexism: what are we talking about? - Scenarios - To go further

TOOLS

SUBTITLED REPLAYS

COnfErence IN ENGLISH

COnfErence IN frENCH

Check out the online version by clicking here

Check out the online version by clicking here

TOOLS

THE podcast

Check out the written version by clicking here

Check out the written version by clicking here

IN SUMMARY

The feedback from these two conferences are very positive, both in terms of timing and overall satisfaction (attendee feedback). The participants particularly appreciated the practical content, emphasising the relevance of the topic addressed. Some feedback reveals a need to go deeper on certain areas and to further promote awareness linked to different situations. In this perspective, it could be interesting to propose a complementary, more interactive format, leaving more space for practice, exchanges between participants and concrete examples.

rePORTED situations OF SEXISM FR

APPENDIx

Téléchargez le fichier en cliquant ici

reported situations of sexism - EN

Téléchargez le fichier en cliquant ici