Decision 1: Define your goal
Prompt: What is your main focus?
Options:
C) Do both A and B.
A) Measure the overall level of psychological safety across all teams.
B) Explore specific experiences and barriers in depth.
Decision 2: Select the tools
Prompt: Which combination of tools should you use?
Options:
C) Interviews with selected teams only
A) Company-wide psychological safety survey only
B) Survey all employees and interviews with select teams
Decision 3: Determine Frequency
Prompt: How often should the assessment be conducted?
OPTIONS:
A) Quarterly pulse surveys and semi-annual interviews.
C) One-time survey and interviews.
B) Continuous interviews only.
Conclusion Slide
Well done! You have navigated a realistic scenario of assessing psychological safety in teams. Even if not every choice was perfect, you explored how thoughtful assessment methods and decisions can generate meaningful, actionable insights.
Inclusion and psychological safety are not about “checking boxes,” but about ensuring all employees can contribute fully and feel valued.
Reflect: How could you apply a similar approach to measuring and improving inclusion and psychological safety in your own workplace?
C: Requires substantial resources and may not capture a representative view across the organization.
A: Quantitative only; lacks depth to identify root causes.
B: Interviews/focus groups reveal detailed experiences but are less generalizable.
Qualitative only; insights may not reflect the full organization.
B: Provides a one-time overview but does not allow for monitoring progress over time.
A (Best Choice): Enables tracking changes over time and measuring the impact of interventions.
(Best Choice): Surveys provide quantitative trends; interviews provide qualitative context.
C (Best Choice): Mixed methods provide both the broad overview and contextual understanding.
A: Surveys can quantify safety levels but may not reveal why employees feel unsafe.
Decision Tree Activity MOD 11
mike
Created on March 3, 2026
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Essential Map
View
Akihabara Map
View
Discover Your AI Assistant
View
Match the Verbs in Spanish: Present and Past
View
Syllabus Organizer for Higher Education
View
History Infographic
View
Visual Thinking Infographic
Explore all templates
Transcript
Decision 1: Define your goal Prompt: What is your main focus?
Options:
C) Do both A and B.
A) Measure the overall level of psychological safety across all teams.
B) Explore specific experiences and barriers in depth.
Decision 2: Select the tools Prompt: Which combination of tools should you use?
Options:
C) Interviews with selected teams only
A) Company-wide psychological safety survey only
B) Survey all employees and interviews with select teams
Decision 3: Determine Frequency Prompt: How often should the assessment be conducted?
OPTIONS:
A) Quarterly pulse surveys and semi-annual interviews.
C) One-time survey and interviews.
B) Continuous interviews only.
Conclusion Slide
Well done! You have navigated a realistic scenario of assessing psychological safety in teams. Even if not every choice was perfect, you explored how thoughtful assessment methods and decisions can generate meaningful, actionable insights. Inclusion and psychological safety are not about “checking boxes,” but about ensuring all employees can contribute fully and feel valued. Reflect: How could you apply a similar approach to measuring and improving inclusion and psychological safety in your own workplace?
C: Requires substantial resources and may not capture a representative view across the organization.
A: Quantitative only; lacks depth to identify root causes.
B: Interviews/focus groups reveal detailed experiences but are less generalizable.
Qualitative only; insights may not reflect the full organization.
B: Provides a one-time overview but does not allow for monitoring progress over time.
A (Best Choice): Enables tracking changes over time and measuring the impact of interventions.
(Best Choice): Surveys provide quantitative trends; interviews provide qualitative context.
C (Best Choice): Mixed methods provide both the broad overview and contextual understanding.
A: Surveys can quantify safety levels but may not reveal why employees feel unsafe.