IDP: South Middleton SD Mid-Year 25-26-SY

NSS PA Quality & Continuous ImprovementReport Card

IDP: South Middleton SD Mid-Year 25-26SY

start

Organized by Goal Type (Subject) vs. Progress

IEP Goal Progress Summary

Overview

• IDP South Middleton’s goals are primarily focused on ELA, Speech, Occupational Therapy, and Math, reflecting the program’s core instructional and service areas.
• Most goals are actively being addressed, with many students demonstrating Making Expected Progress.
• Because the program operates at a smaller scale, overall progress trends are clear and relatively stable across domains.

What’s Strong

• IDP South Middleton demonstrates very few goals fall into limited or no-progress categories, indicating effective instruction and service delivery.
• Progress monitoring data is entered consistently, providing clear visibility into student outcomes and supporting informed decision-making.

Total Goals by Goal Subject

Priority Risks & Opportunity for Improvement

• Behavior shows some regression and no-progress outcomes, which stands out given the otherwise strong trends across other domains.
• A small number of Occupational Therapy goals are marked as not worked on, suggesting follow-through should be monitored to ensure consistent service delivery.

• Recently implemented goals may still be stabilizing, creating an opportunity to use earlier data reviews and targeted behavioral supports to further reduce regression in the second half of the year.

Mid‑Year Restraint & Safety Brief

• NSS IDP South Middleton SD recorded 2 incidents involving 1 student on December 15–16, 2025. There were no incidents reported in August through November or in January. Both incidents were connected to work demands. Each involved aggression toward staff, and some also included peer aggression, property damage, and attempts to leave the area. Incident times were not entered, so patterns by time of day cannot be reviewed.

Strengths & Positive Indicators

Key Performance Metrics

• Total incidents: 2

• Total restraint minutes: 18 minutes
• Average/median hold duration: 9.0 minutes / 9.0 minutes
• Students involved: 1
• Monthly Trend: Aug 0 → Sep 0 → Oct 0 → Nov 0 → Dec 2 → Jan 0

• Incidents only occurred during a two-day period in mid-December, with none before or after, suggesting this may have been an isolated situation rather than an ongoing pattern.

• All incidents were connected to work demands, giving staff a clear area to focus on, supporting students at the start of tasks and during work expectations.

Opportunity for Improvement

Patterns

• Primary Triggers: Demand Given: 100.0%; Denied Access: 0.0%; Transition: 0.0%; Alone / Low Attention: 0.0%

• Behavior Types: Aggression toward staff: 100.0%; Peer aggression: 50.0%; Property destruction: 50.0%; Escape/elopement: 50.0%; Self‑injury: 0.0%

• Temporal Hot Spots: Time‑of‑day: Not available - Incident Time fields not recorded.; Heaviest days: Monday (50%), Tuesday (50%)

• Student Concentration: Highest incidents: S.S. (2) → 100% of incidentsHighest restraint minutes: S.S. (18) → 100% of restraint minutes

• Strengthen task-start skills, teaching students how to ask for help, make small choices, ease into work, and use clear “first/then” routines to reduce escalation during demands.
• Enhance environmental supports and staff response consistency, by organizing classroom layouts, planning calming options in advance, and reinforcing blocking/disengagement practices to reduce close-contact situations.

• Monitor and document consistently, ensuring incident times are recorded and closely reviewing the individual student plan to maintain safety and guide targeted adjustments.

Mid-Year Employee Injury Incident Insights

Lesson Plan Submission Summary Interpretation

Coaching Focus:

• Execution reliability is strong and expectations are clearly understood.
• However, there is no documented instructional feedback embedded in the process (0%), limiting the lesson plan system from functioning as a growth driver.
• This is a high-compliance, low-feedback integration profile.

• Incidents: 3
• During restraint: 0.0%
• Top cause / location / injury: Struck by student, punch, slap / Back corner near desk/cubbies / Contusion/Bruising

• Summary: Small set, classroom‑based strikes; limited injury severity mix.

Lesson Plan Check Sheet

• Submission Rate: 100%
• Feedback Rate: 0%
• Template Usage: 100% when submitted
• Late Submissions: 0%