Wetlands as Nature Based Solutions
Thorslund et al. (2017)
When does a wetland actually function?
why i chose this paper
• Wetlands are widely promoted as nature-based solutions • We often assume restoring one site improves the system • This paper challenges that assumption • It reframes wetlands as hydrologic networks, not isolated filters
how today's discussion will work:
• Each slide contains a multiple-choice question• Vote first — then we’ll discuss (2-3 short responses)• Some have correct answers, some don’t• The goal is to unpack the paper’s core argument The last 2 questions are open ended, with the biggest being the one we will talk about the most.
If most management happens at the site level, why might that be a problem?
Is this just watershed thinking rebranded — or is it actually different?
So is wetland placement more important than wetland efficiency?
What would it look like to actually manage at landscape scale?
Is the barrier scientific, political, or institutional?
Why did you choose that?
so what?
Should wetland restoration be planned and evaluated at watershed scale instead of site scale?
closing thought?
If environmental change happens at landscape scale, but we restore at site scale, are we solving the right problem?
Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions
Leah Rumon
Created on February 10, 2026
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Feedback and Leadership Simulation
View
Product Purchase Simulation
View
Onboarding Quiz for New Employees
View
Work Style Quiz
View
The Meeting Microlearning
View
The Meeting Microlearning Mobile
View
Customer Management Simulation
Explore all templates
Transcript
Wetlands as Nature Based Solutions
Thorslund et al. (2017)
When does a wetland actually function?
why i chose this paper
• Wetlands are widely promoted as nature-based solutions • We often assume restoring one site improves the system • This paper challenges that assumption • It reframes wetlands as hydrologic networks, not isolated filters
how today's discussion will work:
• Each slide contains a multiple-choice question• Vote first — then we’ll discuss (2-3 short responses)• Some have correct answers, some don’t• The goal is to unpack the paper’s core argument The last 2 questions are open ended, with the biggest being the one we will talk about the most.
If most management happens at the site level, why might that be a problem?
Is this just watershed thinking rebranded — or is it actually different?
So is wetland placement more important than wetland efficiency?
What would it look like to actually manage at landscape scale?
Is the barrier scientific, political, or institutional?
Why did you choose that?
so what?
Should wetland restoration be planned and evaluated at watershed scale instead of site scale?
closing thought?
If environmental change happens at landscape scale, but we restore at site scale, are we solving the right problem?