Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!
How emotion’s destroy investment potential
Danny Lee Tran
Created on October 30, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Tech Presentation Mobile
View
Geniaflix Presentation
View
Vintage Mosaic Presentation
View
Shadow Presentation
View
Newspaper Presentation
View
Zen Presentation
View
Audio tutorial
Transcript
How emotion’s destroy investment potential
By: Danny Tran, Jakob Brunsell, Wil Grzelak
start
"You're one call away from winning gang"
- DT
Why Investing?
We are going to show you common trends so after you (Casey) lose at the casino (blow your entire cadet loan) you’re not completely devastated Everyone in this room wants to be successful, investing is one way to achieve that goal
Is investing rational? Or a gamble?
- Like winning in the casino, human's get greedy by nature.
- Lack of patience in the investment market
- Economics assumes investors are rational and markets are efficient
Ways of Knowing
Reasoning – Using logic, analysis, and critical thinking to arrive at conclusions. Ex: I have watched this stock for a few weeks now, tracked its equity, the company news, and now is a good time to buy.
Intuition – Knowing something is right due to a gut feeling, which lacks supporting evidence. Ex: I know this call is about to skyrocket
Authority – Accepting something as true because an expert says to. Ex: I bought 100 shares of AMZN because Jim Cramer on Mad Money said it's about to shoot up.
Experience – Knowing through past observation, personal experience, or experimentation. I've seen this bullish pattern before on a similar company. I'm about to buy tons.
Investing and Reductionism
- Investors look for smaller patterns within stocks to help determine if they should invest or not
- Many amateurs, especially day traders, use these to make their decisions
- Decent in the short run, long holds typically need a more holistic view
- Patterns, P/L statements, cash flow statements, and management are all other reductionist pieces that can be used
Loss Aversion
- On Monday, you go up $1,000. Tuesday you lose $800. Which one triggers more emotion?
- Prospect theory: Humans are more willing to risk when its for loss
- Disposition effect – Selling assets that quickly increase in value while holding assets that are losing hoping they come back
Bias and Heuristics
Representativeness Heuristic:
- Thinking a stock or company is due to takeoff in value because it looks or behaves very similar to a premade image of a successful company.
- Ex: "AI-technology" companies performing well in the stock market, regardless of profitability, due to large company success.
Confirmation Bias:
- Only seeking information that supports your beliefs and disregarding contradictory facts
- Holding on to losing stocks, buying without proper research, and poor diversification
Gamestop and AMC
- In 2021, a Reddit group banded together and started a massive movement on Gamestop and AMC
- January 2021 there was a 1,500% increase in two weeks
- Stock fluctuated between $17.08 and $483
- AMC jumped ~2,500% from late 2020 to June 2021
Herding
- Large groups of people can drive stock prices up or down
- Those outside get FOMO and start throwing money at the stock
- It’s a very expensive and risky game of follow the leader
How to break the Mold
- You must detach emotions from your decision-making
- Just because it worked for someone else doesn’t mean it will work for you
- Seek out people with the opposite perspectives
- Collect the relevant data and make an educated decision
Summary
- Rational investing requires detachment, diverse perspectives, and data-driven choices.
- Key takeaway: Successful investors think long-term, stay analytical, and don’t let emotion drive the trade.
- Loss aversion causes investors to hold losers too long and sell winners
- Herding behavior and FOMO push markets into bubbles—like Gamestop and AMC.
- Emotions distort rational decision-making, leading investors to chase gains or fear losses.
- Biases & heuristics (confirmation bias, representativeness, anchoring)