Explore Activity
NUR5040 | Module 1
Start
If you answered... Yes - Correct - Clearly labeled systematic review of RCTs with rationale for synthesis. A full read still needed for methods and risk of bias. No - Incorrect - Revisit the abstract article. Look again at the first 2–3 sentences—design and rationale are explicitly stated.
View or Download
Red flags that apply to the NEJM letter... - Opinion/letter/editorial presented as if it were definitive research.
- Design–question mismatch (causal claim without an appropriate study design).
- No CIs/effect sizes; no inferential statistics.
- No systematic methods; no reproducible search or flow diagram.
- Overgeneralization; limitations not addressed.
Note: The original author later clarified he never intended the letter to be used as definitive research. Mis-citation amplified its influence.
Red flags that DO NOT apply to the NEJM letter... (don't assume) - Undisclosed conflicts
- unexplained exclusions/attrition
- surrogate-only outcomes
Note: The original author later clarified he never intended the letter to be used as definitive research. Mis-citation amplified its influence.
Bottom Line:
“Trust me not.” Verify study type and design-to-question fit before practice change.
Want to review the activity again?
RETURN TO HOME TO RESTART THE ACTIVITY
M1 Explore | Trust Me or Trust Me Not
DLI
Created on October 3, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Smart Quiz
View
Essential Quiz
View
Practical Quiz
View
Akihabara Quiz
View
Pixel Challenge
View
Math Calculations
View
Piñata Challenge
Explore all templates
Transcript
Explore Activity
NUR5040 | Module 1
Start
If you answered... Yes - Correct - Clearly labeled systematic review of RCTs with rationale for synthesis. A full read still needed for methods and risk of bias. No - Incorrect - Revisit the abstract article. Look again at the first 2–3 sentences—design and rationale are explicitly stated.
View or Download
Red flags that apply to the NEJM letter...- Opinion/letter/editorial presented as if it were definitive research.
- Design–question mismatch (causal claim without an appropriate study design).
- No CIs/effect sizes; no inferential statistics.
- No systematic methods; no reproducible search or flow diagram.
- Overgeneralization; limitations not addressed.
Note: The original author later clarified he never intended the letter to be used as definitive research. Mis-citation amplified its influence.
Red flags that DO NOT apply to the NEJM letter... (don't assume)- Undisclosed conflicts
- unexplained exclusions/attrition
- surrogate-only outcomes
Note: The original author later clarified he never intended the letter to be used as definitive research. Mis-citation amplified its influence.
Bottom Line:
“Trust me not.” Verify study type and design-to-question fit before practice change.
Want to review the activity again?
RETURN TO HOME TO RESTART THE ACTIVITY