Subject: The top half of this painting depicts the Transfiguration of Christ, the moment that reveals his divinity to disciples Peter, James, and John on Mount Tabor. He is framed on either side by Elijah and Moses, both of whom did not leave the earthly realm in a traditional way. The New Testament states that Moses was resurrected and taken into the heavens by God, while Elijah was escorted to Heaven in a "chariot of fire".
The bottom half shows the other nine disciples trying, and failing, to exorcise a demon from a young boy at the base of the mountain.
The disciple in red depicted here is the only one to break the divide between the two scenes. As Kleinbub suggests, this shows that while he is not corporally viewing the Transfiguration, he is, however, witnessing the divine transformation through internal, spirtitual perception (pp. 374).
As an altarpiece, the painting would likely be slightly above its viewer, placing them within the bottom half of the scene amongst the nine disciples and the family of the possessed boy. This perspective would have forced its viewers to physically look up at Christ and encourage them to be reverent, augmenting the desire to be amongst the chosen few who were able to witness the revelation of the divinity of Christ.
However, it would also act as a vehicle for its viewer to witness the Transfiguration as the disciple in red did, through internal rather than physical perception.
This painting also demonstrates the three varieties of vision regarding the contemplation of God. The corporal, or external, is represented alongside internal, or imaginary vision, by the struggle between the apostles and the family of the possessed boy. However, the apostle's internal vision is substantiated by the Transfiguration in the upper half of the painting, depicting both the historical and potential imaginary visions of Christ that would have been inspired within the apostles. (Kleinbub, pp. 386)
As an altarpiece, it would have also inspired repeated visual imagination and memory of Christ, serving to reinforce faith in its viewers, something Winckelmann suggests is much more effective than reading books. (Winckelmann pp.75)
Context: This painting is the Transfiguration by Raphael. It was commissioned by Cardinal Giulio de Medici around 1516-17 and was completed in 1520. The painting was commissioned to serve as an altarpiece in the Cathedral of Saint Juste in Narbonne.
1. Would Winckelmann agree with my interpretation that this altarpiece can be potentially substituted for simply reading about the story of The Transfiguration, and possibly be more effective? 2. How effective would both the placement and content of the piece be in evoking spiritual imagery alongside related memories of divine connection? 3. Were viewers able to make the connection between the upper and lower panels, specifically regarding the apostle in red as a bridge between them?
Jenkins_Object_Annotation_1
Lauryn Roberts
Created on September 23, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Decisions and Behaviors in the Workplace
View
Tangram Game
View
Process Flow: Corporate Recruitment
View
Weekly Corporate Challenge
View
Wellbeing and Healthy Routines
View
Match the Verbs in Spanish: Present and Past
View
Planets Sorting Game
Explore all templates
Transcript
Subject: The top half of this painting depicts the Transfiguration of Christ, the moment that reveals his divinity to disciples Peter, James, and John on Mount Tabor. He is framed on either side by Elijah and Moses, both of whom did not leave the earthly realm in a traditional way. The New Testament states that Moses was resurrected and taken into the heavens by God, while Elijah was escorted to Heaven in a "chariot of fire".
The bottom half shows the other nine disciples trying, and failing, to exorcise a demon from a young boy at the base of the mountain.
The disciple in red depicted here is the only one to break the divide between the two scenes. As Kleinbub suggests, this shows that while he is not corporally viewing the Transfiguration, he is, however, witnessing the divine transformation through internal, spirtitual perception (pp. 374).
As an altarpiece, the painting would likely be slightly above its viewer, placing them within the bottom half of the scene amongst the nine disciples and the family of the possessed boy. This perspective would have forced its viewers to physically look up at Christ and encourage them to be reverent, augmenting the desire to be amongst the chosen few who were able to witness the revelation of the divinity of Christ.
However, it would also act as a vehicle for its viewer to witness the Transfiguration as the disciple in red did, through internal rather than physical perception.
This painting also demonstrates the three varieties of vision regarding the contemplation of God. The corporal, or external, is represented alongside internal, or imaginary vision, by the struggle between the apostles and the family of the possessed boy. However, the apostle's internal vision is substantiated by the Transfiguration in the upper half of the painting, depicting both the historical and potential imaginary visions of Christ that would have been inspired within the apostles. (Kleinbub, pp. 386)
As an altarpiece, it would have also inspired repeated visual imagination and memory of Christ, serving to reinforce faith in its viewers, something Winckelmann suggests is much more effective than reading books. (Winckelmann pp.75)
Context: This painting is the Transfiguration by Raphael. It was commissioned by Cardinal Giulio de Medici around 1516-17 and was completed in 1520. The painting was commissioned to serve as an altarpiece in the Cathedral of Saint Juste in Narbonne.
1. Would Winckelmann agree with my interpretation that this altarpiece can be potentially substituted for simply reading about the story of The Transfiguration, and possibly be more effective? 2. How effective would both the placement and content of the piece be in evoking spiritual imagery alongside related memories of divine connection? 3. Were viewers able to make the connection between the upper and lower panels, specifically regarding the apostle in red as a bridge between them?