comparing extracurricular access across the US
This chart shows how extracurricular participation has changed over time, showing how access and opportunities differ by race and demographics.
National disparities — Brookings data (2016–2019)
Updated national data — NCES/Census (2020–2024)
Schools with ≤25% students of color: 9% participation (below national average)
85% of the nation’s public K–12 schools offer after-school programs for students in 2024–2025
NCES/Census (2020–2024)
60% of public schools offer academically focused after-school programs in 2024–2025
More recent NCES data from 2020-2024 looks at K–12 participation in academically focused after-school and summer programs. It shows that schools with higher percentages of students of color often have higher participation than schools with fewer students of color. While this isn’t a perfect match for income, race, community, and local context can affect access, and even schools in relatively affluent areas, like Carlmont, still face challenges in making sure all students can fully participate.
But about 13% of students are expected to participate
Schools with 76–100% students of color: 17% participation (above national average)
Link
+ info
Average Number of extracurriculars reported with top-level leadership roles by student demographics
Average Number of extracurriculars reported with excellence by student demographics
Brookings survey
A Brookings analysis of data from college applications from 2016–2019 found that students from higher-income families were far more likely to hold leadership roles or report excellence in extracurricular activities. While this data is several years old, it it is part of a longer trend: access to top-level opportunities has historically been shaped by socioeconomic and demographic factors. Equity gaps in extracuriculars are not new and continue to affect students today.
comparing extracurricular access across the US
Rachel Hong
Created on September 23, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Sorting Cards
View
Interactive Scoreboard
View
Semicircle Mind Map
View
Visual Thinking Checklist
View
Choice Board Flipcards
View
Team Retrospective
View
Fill in the Blanks
Explore all templates
Transcript
comparing extracurricular access across the US
This chart shows how extracurricular participation has changed over time, showing how access and opportunities differ by race and demographics.
National disparities — Brookings data (2016–2019)
Updated national data — NCES/Census (2020–2024)
Schools with ≤25% students of color: 9% participation (below national average)
85% of the nation’s public K–12 schools offer after-school programs for students in 2024–2025
NCES/Census (2020–2024)
60% of public schools offer academically focused after-school programs in 2024–2025
More recent NCES data from 2020-2024 looks at K–12 participation in academically focused after-school and summer programs. It shows that schools with higher percentages of students of color often have higher participation than schools with fewer students of color. While this isn’t a perfect match for income, race, community, and local context can affect access, and even schools in relatively affluent areas, like Carlmont, still face challenges in making sure all students can fully participate.
But about 13% of students are expected to participate
Schools with 76–100% students of color: 17% participation (above national average)
Link
+ info
Average Number of extracurriculars reported with top-level leadership roles by student demographics
Average Number of extracurriculars reported with excellence by student demographics
Brookings survey
A Brookings analysis of data from college applications from 2016–2019 found that students from higher-income families were far more likely to hold leadership roles or report excellence in extracurricular activities. While this data is several years old, it it is part of a longer trend: access to top-level opportunities has historically been shaped by socioeconomic and demographic factors. Equity gaps in extracuriculars are not new and continue to affect students today.