PLay
The AI Decision Lab 🧪
Test your judgment, explore the boundaries, and see how AI can enhance—or shortcut—learning
start
QUESTION 1/6 - Clarification
Question 1/6 - Debate
Instructor Strategies
Respond to the student's post in Hypothesis: “Which counterarguments surprised you? How did this change your position?”
QUESTION 2/6 - Grammarly
QUESTION 2/6 - Grammarly
Instructor Follow Up
Allow but require transparency: “Note when AI helped polish your work.” Add a reflection: “What did AI change? Why did you accept or reject its suggestions?”
QUESTION 3/6 - Copyright
QUESTION 3/6 - Copyright
Instructor Action
Clearly forbid uploading of course materials into AI in your AI Statement and/or assignment guidance.
QUESTION 4/6 - Idea Expansion
QUESTION 4/6 - Idea Expansion
Instructor Action
In a Hypothesis comment, encourage metacognitive reflection. Ask how AI's concerns compared with the student's own.
QUESTION 5/6 - Citations
QUESTION 5/6 - Citations
Instructor Action
In the AI Statement and/or Assignment Guidance, clarify: “AI can format references, but you are responsible for accuracy.” Encourage cross-checking with APA manual or library guide.
QUESTION 6/6 - Up for Review
QUESTION 6/6 - For Review
Question
If the student has the raw thinking (fragments/notes) but uses AI to turn them into polished academic sentences, the heavy lifting of learning—developing voice, practicing academic style, and organizing thoughts into clear prose—gets skipped. Is that a valuable part of the assignment? What might your initial assignment guidance say?
Possible option: AI Use Reminder: Only use AI to check grammar or clarity after writing your own ideas. Do not have AI complete or rewrite your annotations. Cite any AI use in your reflection. Why: Writing your own words helps you develop understanding and critical thinking about the topic.
End of the Game!
Congratulations, Lab Researcher! 🎉You’ve navigated the AI maze, explored boundaries, and practiced spotting ethical vs. prohibited AI use. Here’s what you’ve learned: ✅ AI can amplify thinking when used to brainstorm, explore perspectives, or clarify your own ideas. ✅ Some uses undermine learning—ghostwriting, full rewrite, or generating work you don’t understand. ✅ Transparency matters—acknowledge your AI assistant and reflect on what it helped you learn. ✅ Critical thinking and ownership are the real outcomes; AI is a tool, not a shortcut. 💡 Quick Challenge: Name one way you’ll use AI responsibly in your next assignment.
The AI Decision Lab 🧪
Cameron Bentley
Created on September 19, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Piñata Challenge
View
Pixel Challenge
View
Corporate Challenge Game
View
Catch the Stars
View
Movie Minigames
View
Question Wheel
View
Character Clue Game Mobile
Explore all templates
Transcript
PLay
The AI Decision Lab 🧪
Test your judgment, explore the boundaries, and see how AI can enhance—or shortcut—learning
start
QUESTION 1/6 - Clarification
Question 1/6 - Debate
Instructor Strategies
Respond to the student's post in Hypothesis: “Which counterarguments surprised you? How did this change your position?”
QUESTION 2/6 - Grammarly
QUESTION 2/6 - Grammarly
Instructor Follow Up
Allow but require transparency: “Note when AI helped polish your work.” Add a reflection: “What did AI change? Why did you accept or reject its suggestions?”
QUESTION 3/6 - Copyright
QUESTION 3/6 - Copyright
Instructor Action
Clearly forbid uploading of course materials into AI in your AI Statement and/or assignment guidance.
QUESTION 4/6 - Idea Expansion
QUESTION 4/6 - Idea Expansion
Instructor Action
In a Hypothesis comment, encourage metacognitive reflection. Ask how AI's concerns compared with the student's own.
QUESTION 5/6 - Citations
QUESTION 5/6 - Citations
Instructor Action
In the AI Statement and/or Assignment Guidance, clarify: “AI can format references, but you are responsible for accuracy.” Encourage cross-checking with APA manual or library guide.
QUESTION 6/6 - Up for Review
QUESTION 6/6 - For Review
Question
If the student has the raw thinking (fragments/notes) but uses AI to turn them into polished academic sentences, the heavy lifting of learning—developing voice, practicing academic style, and organizing thoughts into clear prose—gets skipped. Is that a valuable part of the assignment? What might your initial assignment guidance say?
Possible option: AI Use Reminder: Only use AI to check grammar or clarity after writing your own ideas. Do not have AI complete or rewrite your annotations. Cite any AI use in your reflection. Why: Writing your own words helps you develop understanding and critical thinking about the topic.
End of the Game!
Congratulations, Lab Researcher! 🎉You’ve navigated the AI maze, explored boundaries, and practiced spotting ethical vs. prohibited AI use. Here’s what you’ve learned: ✅ AI can amplify thinking when used to brainstorm, explore perspectives, or clarify your own ideas. ✅ Some uses undermine learning—ghostwriting, full rewrite, or generating work you don’t understand. ✅ Transparency matters—acknowledge your AI assistant and reflect on what it helped you learn. ✅ Critical thinking and ownership are the real outcomes; AI is a tool, not a shortcut. 💡 Quick Challenge: Name one way you’ll use AI responsibly in your next assignment.