Rule of Law
The rule of law ensures that no one is above the law, and it provides a framework for the administration of justice, protecting individual rights and maintaining order.
Application: The rule of law serves as a foundation for a just legal system, holding everyone accountable—from government officials to private citizens. For example, in United States v. Nixon (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that even the president must comply with judicial orders, reinforcing the idea that no one, not even the highest public official, is above the law.
Civil Rights
Civil Rights include equal protection of the law and suffrage.
Application: Civil rights are at the core of ensuring equality and justice in American society. For instance, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court struck down racial segregation in public schools, asserting that "separate but equal" violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case expanded civil rights by challenging discriminatory laws and upholding the principle that all persons deserve equal protection.
Unenumerated Rights
The rights are protected in the Ninth Amendment, which states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
Application: The Constitution and Bill of Rights enumerated (listed) certain individual rights. While all three branches have a role to play in defining and protecting those rights, the Supreme Court has assumed a larger role in doing so. For example, the Court stated that there was a right to privacy as an unenumerated right in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). In Griswold, the Supreme Court struck down a law banning contraceptives for married couples, ruling that it violated the right to marital privacy.
Privileges or Immunities Clause
Application: Although its interpretation has been limited, the Privileges or Immunities Clause was invoked in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) to determine the scope of rights protected against state infringement, though the case ultimately narrowed the clause’s application to violations by state governments of equal rights.
Due Process Clause
While the Fifth Amendment generally is associated with protecting procedural due process, the Fourteenth Amendment is associated with substantive due process. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by state governments outside the sanction of law.
Application: While Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment states, “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article,” the Supreme Court has used the substantive due process clause to define certain fundamental rights. The Supreme Court applied the Due Process Clause in Roe v. Wade (1973), which established abortion rights as fundamental.
Equal Protection Clause
Application: The Equal Protection Clause was crucial in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education (1954), in which the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Due Process
Application: In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court incorporated the Sixth Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment and ruled that states must provide an attorney to defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford one, ensuring the right to a fair trial as part of due process.
Liberty Interest
Application: In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court struck down sodomy laws in the states, stating that consensual sexual conduct is part of the liberty protected by substantive due process.
Substantive Due Process
Substantive due process goes beyond procedural fairness and ensures that certain rights, such as privacy or marriage, are deemed fundamental and protected from unreasonable government infringement. Over time, the Supreme Court has assumed a significant role in defining and enforcing these rights, a power that has been subject to debate. Critics argue that the Court may be exceeding its constitutional authority and infringing on the powers of Congress. This tension raises important questions about judicial overreach and the proper role of Congress and the Court in enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment.
Application: In Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the Supreme Court used substantive due process to overturn state laws to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide, recognizing marriage as a fundamental right that cannot be denied by the states.
Fundamental Rights
Fundamental rights are rights that receive high-level protection from government interference, both by state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment and by the federal government through the Fifth Amendment. All the branches of government have a role to play in their various capacities to protect fundamental rights.
Incorporation Doctrine
Application: The Mapp v. Ohio (1961) case incorporated the exclusionary rule to apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This rule prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was seized in a manner that violated the Fourth Amendment.
Selective Incorporation
Application: In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Supreme Court ruled that the fundamental right to keep and bear arms that is guaranteed by the Second Amendment is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This is an example of selective incorporation.
Due Process Key Terms
Bill of Rights Institute
Created on April 17, 2025
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Vision Board
View
Periodic Table
View
SWOT Challenge: Classify Key Factors
View
Explainer Video: Keys to Effective Communication
View
Explainer Video: AI for Companies
View
Corporate CV
View
Flow Presentation
Explore all templates
Transcript
Rule of Law
The rule of law ensures that no one is above the law, and it provides a framework for the administration of justice, protecting individual rights and maintaining order.
Application: The rule of law serves as a foundation for a just legal system, holding everyone accountable—from government officials to private citizens. For example, in United States v. Nixon (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that even the president must comply with judicial orders, reinforcing the idea that no one, not even the highest public official, is above the law.
Civil Rights
Civil Rights include equal protection of the law and suffrage.
Application: Civil rights are at the core of ensuring equality and justice in American society. For instance, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court struck down racial segregation in public schools, asserting that "separate but equal" violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case expanded civil rights by challenging discriminatory laws and upholding the principle that all persons deserve equal protection.
Unenumerated Rights
The rights are protected in the Ninth Amendment, which states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
Application: The Constitution and Bill of Rights enumerated (listed) certain individual rights. While all three branches have a role to play in defining and protecting those rights, the Supreme Court has assumed a larger role in doing so. For example, the Court stated that there was a right to privacy as an unenumerated right in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). In Griswold, the Supreme Court struck down a law banning contraceptives for married couples, ruling that it violated the right to marital privacy.
Privileges or Immunities Clause
Application: Although its interpretation has been limited, the Privileges or Immunities Clause was invoked in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) to determine the scope of rights protected against state infringement, though the case ultimately narrowed the clause’s application to violations by state governments of equal rights.
Due Process Clause
While the Fifth Amendment generally is associated with protecting procedural due process, the Fourteenth Amendment is associated with substantive due process. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by state governments outside the sanction of law.
Application: While Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment states, “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article,” the Supreme Court has used the substantive due process clause to define certain fundamental rights. The Supreme Court applied the Due Process Clause in Roe v. Wade (1973), which established abortion rights as fundamental.
Equal Protection Clause
Application: The Equal Protection Clause was crucial in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education (1954), in which the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Due Process
Application: In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court incorporated the Sixth Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment and ruled that states must provide an attorney to defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford one, ensuring the right to a fair trial as part of due process.
Liberty Interest
Application: In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court struck down sodomy laws in the states, stating that consensual sexual conduct is part of the liberty protected by substantive due process.
Substantive Due Process
Substantive due process goes beyond procedural fairness and ensures that certain rights, such as privacy or marriage, are deemed fundamental and protected from unreasonable government infringement. Over time, the Supreme Court has assumed a significant role in defining and enforcing these rights, a power that has been subject to debate. Critics argue that the Court may be exceeding its constitutional authority and infringing on the powers of Congress. This tension raises important questions about judicial overreach and the proper role of Congress and the Court in enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment.
Application: In Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the Supreme Court used substantive due process to overturn state laws to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide, recognizing marriage as a fundamental right that cannot be denied by the states.
Fundamental Rights
Fundamental rights are rights that receive high-level protection from government interference, both by state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment and by the federal government through the Fifth Amendment. All the branches of government have a role to play in their various capacities to protect fundamental rights.
Incorporation Doctrine
Application: The Mapp v. Ohio (1961) case incorporated the exclusionary rule to apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This rule prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was seized in a manner that violated the Fourth Amendment.
Selective Incorporation
Application: In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Supreme Court ruled that the fundamental right to keep and bear arms that is guaranteed by the Second Amendment is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This is an example of selective incorporation.