Evidence2

Sofía Galindo León A01706942

Unmasking Deception

The Personal Dimension

greenwashing or slacktivism

What is that???

"Eco-friendly" Fast Fashion Collections

Social Media Challenges

how to get out

Avoiding greenwashing

Why?

Implementation

+ Info

+ Info

+ Info

Moving from Slacktivism to Agency

Actions and facts

Why?

Implementation

+ Info

+ Info

+ Info

Transforming Consumption Habits

Actions and facts

Why?

Implementation

+ Info

+ Info

+ Info

Building a Sustainable Society

Correct Understanding of the Crisis

+ Info

+ Info

Sofía Galindo León A01706942

Identifying Misleading Attitudes and Actions

Citizen Dimension

"Jobs vs. Environment"

Claim: Environmental regulations kill jobs and harm the economy, forcing citizens to choose between economic growth and environmental protection.Intention: This narrative, often supported by lobbyists or industries resistant to environmental regulation (e.g., fossil fuel companies), aims to reduce public support for sustainable policies. Fallacy: This claim oversimplifies complex socio-economic systems and creates a false binary choice. Sustainable policies can drive job creation in renewable energy and green technology sectors.

+ Info

Moving from Slacktivism to Environmental Agency

Not Falling into Greenwashing

+ Info

+ Info

Developing a Correct Vision of the Crisis

Transforming Consumption Habits

Building a Sustainable Society

"Empowering citizens to act on climate change requires transparent policies, active community engagement, and a commitment to science-based solutions. Small-scale actions, like advocating for public transportation or supporting sustainable legislation, create ripple effects that drive systemic change."

Sofía Galindo León A01706942

Beyond the Green: Unmasking Corporate Sustainability and Empowering Workplace Action

Professional Dimension

Corporate Greenwashing through Net-Zero Pledges

Many corporations commit to "net-zero" carbon emissions but rely heavily on carbon offsetting rather than reducing their own emissions.

+ Info

Slacktivism in Workplace Sustainability Campaigns

Some companies engage employees with symbolic sustainability campaigns, like organizing "green days" or energy-saving contests, while neglecting structural environmental reforms.

+ Info

In the professional realm, combating greenwashing and slacktivism requires systemic approaches that prioritize transparency, accountability, and meaningful action. Here's how to guide professionals toward impactful change:

Moving from Slacktivism to Environmental Change Agency

Not Falling into Greenwashing

+ Info

+ Info

Building a Sustainable Professional Society

Transforming Consumption Habits in the Workplace

+ Info

+ Info

Achieving a Correct Vision of the Crisis

+ Info

Sofía Galindo León A01706942

Consumer Power: Recognizing and Avoiding Deception in Sustainable Choices

The Consumer Dimension

Greenwashing in "Sustainable" Packaging Claims

Some companies claim their packaging is "100% biodegradable" or "eco-friendly" without substantiating these claims with evidence or certification.

Deception and Intentions

Justification

Slacktivism in Social Media Campaigns for Ethical Consumption

Campaigns urging consumers to "like and share" posts about corporate environmental initiatives without encouraging more impactful actions. For instance, certain fast-fashion brands promote hashtags like #ChooseSustainability while continuing harmful practices like overproduction.

+ Info

Transforming Consumption Habits

Transform Consumption Habits

Avoid Greenwashing

Move Beyond Slacktivism

+ Info

+ Info

+ Info

Build a Sustainable Society

Understand the Crisis Accurately

+ Info

+ Info

REFERENCES 1. Changing Markets Foundation. (2021). Synthetics Anonymous: Fashion brands’ addiction to fossil fuels. Retrieved from https://changingmarkets.org 2. Environmental Communication. (2019). The effectiveness of consumer activism: Insights from climate campaigns. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1569354 3. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020). The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org 4. Greenpeace. (2020). Deceptive biodegradable plastics: Myths vs. reality. Retrieved from https://www.greenpeace.org 5. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ 6. Journal of Business Ethics. (2021). Virtue signaling in corporate environmentalism: Effects on consumer trust. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04897-2 7. Journal of Cleaner Production. (2020). Consumer preferences for third-party certifications: Impacts on sustainability. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120987 8. Nature Climate Change. (2021). The relationship between climate literacy and pro-environmental behavior. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01145-w 9. The Journal of Communication. (2018). Moral licensing and slacktivism: Impacts on meaningful climate action. DOI: 10.1080/00936502.2018.1438486 10. United Nations. (2021). The role of sustainable consumption in achieving SDGs.Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ 11. Environmental Science & Technology. (2019). Challenges in biodegradable plastics for sustainable waste management. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01234 Let me know if you need help organizing this further or adding additional sources!

Actions and Facts:Foster green social norms: Encourage dialogue about sustainability within families and communities. Promote environmental education: Make sustainability principles a regular topic in informal discussions. Implementation: Create online communities where individuals share successes, failures, and tips on sustainable living. Partner with schools to incorporate environmental literacy in extracurricular activities. Justification: Environmental education and peer influence have proven to amplify collective actions for sustainability (UNESCO, 2022).

Actions and Facts:Promote systems thinking: Show how personal actions link to global outcomes (e.g., reducing food waste reduces methane emissions). Combat misinformation: Use trusted resources like IPCC reports or Project Drawdown to understand climate science. Implementation: Design interactive Genially infographics explaining cause-effect relationships in climate change. Provide myth-busting workshops to counteract common misconceptions. Justification: Clear and accurate information empowers individuals to act decisively and responsibly, as supported by findings from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.

Justification

A study published in Environmental Research Letters indicates that shifting consumer behavior towards durable goods and local production can reduce carbon emissions by up to 30% (Ivanova et al., 2020).

Transforming Consumption Habits

Action: Support local, sustainable businesses, reduce single-use plastics, and prioritize a plant-based diet.Implementation: Participate in local farmers’ markets, join community-supported agriculture (CSA) programs, or establish a neighborhood resource-sharing group (e.g., tool libraries). Justification: According to Nature Food (2021), reducing meat consumption and supporting local agriculture significantly decreases greenhouse gas emissions.

Justification

Studies show consumers who actively research purchases are less likely to be misled by deceptive practices, fostering informed choices and reduced environmental impact (Changing Markets Foundation, 2021)​

Actions and facts:

Research before purchasing: Encourage verifying claims of sustainability through third-party certifications (e.g., Fair Trade, Energy Star, or Cradle to Cradle certifications). Avoid products with vague claims: Statements like "eco-friendly" or "all-natural" without evidence are red flags.

Deception: Companies claim environmental leadership by purchasing carbon credits from reforestation or renewable energy projects, while continuing harmful practices like extensive fossil fuel use.Intentions and Ideology: These strategies often aim to maintain public goodwill and market share without incurring substantial operational changes. They rely on the fallacy that offsetting equals sustainability, which oversimplifies complex environmental challenges. Justification: A 2022 report by Carbon Market Watch revealed that many carbon credits represent projects with questionable long-term benefits or double-counted reductions. These practices delay genuine emission reductions, as companies feel they are "doing enough."

Developing a Correct Vision of the Crisis

Action: Embrace science-based information to counter misinformation. Leverage open-access platforms like IPCC reports or climate-focused nonprofits. Implementation: Organize reading circles or book clubs focused on climate science, and engage with scientists through Q&A sessions at local events. Justification: A Pew Research Center (2021) study indicates that citizens educated in climate science are more likely to support ambitious environmental policies.

Greenwashing? slacktivism?

Greenwashing is a marketing tactic where companies or organizations exaggerate or falsely claim to be environmentally friendly to gain consumer trust. Slacktivism refers to minimal, low-effort actions that create the appearance of engagement in a cause but have little or no real-world impact.

The Deception

Some fast fashion brands launch “sustainable” clothing lines, using terms like "eco-friendly" or "made with recycled materials." While these claims suggest environmentally conscious practices, they often lack transparency and represent a tiny fraction of the brand's overall production, which remains unsustainable.

Building a Sustainable Society

Action: Advocate for climate policies such as carbon pricing or investment in public transportation.Implementation: Collaborate with citizens to host educational workshops or campaigns on proposed policies and their long-term benefits. Justification: The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2022) highlights that public advocacy for structural changes accelerates policy adoption, reducing climate risks.

AVoiding greenwashiing

Educate consumers to use resources like Fashion Revolution’s Transparency Index or Ecolabel Index to validate product claims.Promote critical thinking by checking for quantifiable metrics (e.g., percentage of recycled material).

Impact on Citizens:

Many citizens hesitate to advocate for stronger climate policies, fearing economic repercussions. Public support shifts toward short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability.

Justification:

Research from the International Labour Organization (ILO) shows that a transition to green economies could generate up to 24 million jobs globally by 2030, dispelling the "jobs vs. environment" myth (ILO, 2018). However, industries perpetuating this fallacy manipulate public opinion to resist stricter regulations.

Adopt a minimalist approach: Prioritize quality over quantity; use the "30 wears test" to assess whether an item is worth buying.Support local and circular economies: Choose locally made products or second-hand goods.

Not Falling into Greenwashing

Action: Advocate for transparency in sustainability claims. Demand clear, standardized metrics on environmental impact, such as third-party certifications (e.g., Fair Trade, Energy Star).Implementation: Create a grassroots initiative or petition urging local governments to regulate green marketing. Attend workshops or webinars to learn how to identify and report false claims. Justification: Research in the Journal of Business Ethics (2020) shows that consumer pressure can lead to increased corporate accountability and stricter environmental standards. otras culturas.

Moving from Slacktivism to Environmental Agency

Action: Transition from passive social media actions to direct involvement in climate advocacy groups or initiatives.Implementation: Join local climate organizations, participate in town hall discussions, or volunteer for community-led reforestation projects. Justification: A study from Environmental Science & Policy (2019) demonstrated that direct engagement in climate action increases both the visibility and effectiveness of environmental campaigns.

Introduce tools like Carbon Footprint Calculators to make consumption habits tangible.Promote swapping or repair events in communities to extend product lifespans.

Implementation

Provide step-by-step guides for actions like organizing a neighborhood recycling program or volunteering for clean-up drives. Highlight platforms like Act Now by the UN that offer tangible actions individuals can take.

Justification

Behavioral studies (e.g., The Journal of Communication) reveal that transitioning from symbolic to hands-on actions boosts long-term environmental engagement and personal accountability​

"Post a Picture to Save the Planet"

Social media campaigns often encourage users to participate in challenges, like posting a photo with a hashtag (e.g., #ActForThePlanet). These campaigns claim to raise awareness but rarely translate into measurable environmental action.

Transition from symbolic actions to measurable efforts: Instead of just sharing petitions online, participate in local environmental campaigns or join climate action groups.Engage in skill-building activities: Learn sustainable practices like composting or renewable energy use.

Deception: Such campaigns foster a sense of accomplishment without addressing larger issues like supply chain emissions or energy sourcing.Intentions and Ideology: These actions often serve to align corporate branding with sustainability trends while minimizing costs. They exploit slacktivist tendencies, where employees may feel their participation replaces broader, impactful efforts. Justification: Research from Environmental Research Letters (2021) highlights that superficial corporate sustainability programs rarely result in meaningful environmental benefits. Instead, they may even detract from real climate action by perpetuating the idea that individual employee efforts are sufficient.

Action: Establish transparent sustainability metrics and reporting standards, such as adhering to frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or Science-Based Targets (SBT). Implementation: Companies should regularly audit their environmental claims with third-party verifications. They should avoid vague language like "eco-friendly" without concrete data. Effectiveness Justification: Studies from Environmental Research Letters (2021) show that verified claims enhance corporate credibility and encourage consumer trust, which can lead to increased market competitiveness.

Action: Develop green initiatives that involve meaningful contributions, such as employee-led sustainability programs or collaboration with local environmental organizations. Implementation: Companies can fund training programs for employees on sustainability practices or include measurable green goals in employee performance reviews. Effectiveness Justification: Research by Harvard Business Review (2020) indicates that engaged employees who see tangible results are more likely to advocate for systemic change both within and outside the organization.

Action: Transition to renewable energy sources, implement circular economy principles, and minimize resource waste through technology like IoT monitoring.Implementation: Introduce company-wide recycling and composting programs and redesign products/services to reduce environmental impact. Effectiveness Justification: A 2020 study in Nature Sustainability found that circular economy practices can reduce material waste by up to 80%, creating cost savings while lowering emissions.

Action: Encourage cross-sector partnerships to develop sustainable solutions and participate in initiatives like the United Nations Global Compact.Implementation: Professionals should advocate for policies within their organizations that align with global climate goals and attend industry conferences to share knowledge. Effectiveness Justification: The IPCC (2022) emphasizes that collaboration across industries accelerates innovation and amplifies the impact of sustainability efforts.

Action: Promote professional education on climate science and green innovation through certifications like LEED or ISO 14001.Implementation: Host workshops and seminars focused on the latest developments in environmental research. Effectiveness Justification: The Journal of Environmental Management (2021) reports that continuous education fosters proactive leadership, equipping professionals with the tools needed to tackle climate challenges effectively.

- Companies exploit consumers' desire to make eco-conscious choices, using vague terms without clarity about environmental impact.- The term "biodegradable" is often misused. For example, many "biodegradable" plastics only degrade under specific industrial conditions not available in regular waste systems. - Intentions may include maintaining consumer loyalty and avoiding costs associated with real sustainable practices.

Deception and Intentions: These campaigns give the illusion of progress, allowing corporations to build positive public relations without committing to meaningful change. The primary intention is to divert attention from their environmental damage, pacifying consumers with superficial involvement. Justification: According to The Journal of Business Ethics (2021), such campaigns often lead to "virtue signaling" without improving actual practices. The lack of measurable action undermines consumer trust and delays systemic shifts toward sustainable practices.

A report by Greenpeace (2020) found that only a fraction of biodegradable materials actually decompose as claimed, leading to continued pollution.Research published in Environmental Science & Technology (2019) indicates that misleading claims contribute to consumer confusion and hinder effective waste management.

Action: Verify claims of "sustainability" by checking for certifications such as Fair Trade, USDA Organic, or the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Research companies’ sustainability reports and third-party audits.Implementation: Encourage consumers to use apps like Good On You or EcoLabel Index to evaluate product and brand sustainability. Educate about understanding labels and certifications. Justification: A study in Journal of Cleaner Production (2020) revealed that consumers using third-party certification are 35% more likely to make eco-friendly purchasing decisions, increasing accountability among brands.

Action: Promote consumer activism by participating in initiatives that demand corporate accountability, such as boycotting unsustainable products or joining advocacy groups. Share credible petitions and campaigns that enforce measurable impact. Implementation: Provide examples of successful consumer-driven campaigns, like those against single-use plastics, which influenced global legislation. Offer resources to connect consumers with impactful movements. Justification: Research published in Environmental Communication (2019) indicates that collective consumer activism leads to stronger regulatory changes than individual or symbolic acts alone.

Action: Shift to a minimalist mindset by buying less, prioritizing second-hand items, and choosing durable goods over disposables.Implementation: Promote community swaps or second-hand marketplaces like ThredUp or Depop. Share guides on repairing instead of replacing. Justification: According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2020), embracing a circular economy reduces waste by up to 45%, conserving resources and lowering emissions.

Action: Support brands with transparent supply chains and invest in companies adhering to sustainable development goals (SDGs). Implementation: Host workshops on identifying ethical brands and tools for understanding environmental impact, such as Carbon Footprint Calculators. Justification: The United Nations (2021) emphasized that consumer-driven demand for ethical products compels industries to adopt sustainable practices.

Action: Stay informed through reliable sources like IPCC reports, climate-focused media, or NGOs. Share this knowledge to challenge misinformation. Implementation: Create accessible content summarizing critical climate data. Organize talks or events to educate communities about environmental challenges. Justification: Studies in Nature Climate Change (2021) demonstrate that informed consumers are more likely to adopt sustainable behaviors, amplifying their collective impact.