Free vs. Freedom in Open Education
Erin Measom
Created on November 12, 2024
Over 30 million people create interactive content in Genially.
Check out what others have designed:
7 CONTINENTS
Horizontal infographics
A2 - ABENTEUER AUTOBAHN
Horizontal infographics
EUROPE PHYSICAL MAP
Horizontal infographics
TEN WAYS TO SAVE WATER
Horizontal infographics
GRETA THUNBERG
Horizontal infographics
FIRE FIGHTER
Horizontal infographics
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES NOV DEBATE
Horizontal infographics
Transcript
Free
Freedom
Financially motivated adoption – Institutions prioritize free OER options primarily for budgetary relief, rather than pedagogical benefits.
Potential for global sharing and collaboration – Open licenses encourage the use and modification of resources worldwide.
Focus on academic empowerment – Highlighting the flexibility OER provides to educators and students alike.
Advocating for open pedagogy – Promoting OER as tools that enable innovative teaching and learning approaches.
Student engagement through creation – Inviting students to contribute by updating or creating OER materials themselves.
Relevant to high-cost educational settings – Emphasizing the cost-saving benefit in regions with high textbook costs.
Appeal to student groups – Presenting OER as zero-cost resources, which directly benefits students financially.
Supporting pedagogical flexibility – Enabling faculty to reshape materials for specific course goals, beyond just using them as-is.
Instructor convenience – OER as a simple swap for commercial textbooks, without requiring adaptation.
Replacing costly textbooks with free versions – Using OER to lower student expenses without necessarily changing teaching approaches.
Permission to adapt and remix content – Encouraging educational freedom by allowing modifications to resources.
Primary focus on affordability – Emphasizing cost savings as the main benefit of OER.
Free vs. Freedom in Open Education
Financially motivated adoption – Institutions prioritize free OER options primarily for budgetary relief, rather than pedagogical benefits.
Potential for global sharing and collaboration – Open licenses encourage the use and modification of resources worldwide.
Focus on academic empowerment – Highlighting the flexibility OER provides to educators and students alike.
Advocating for open pedagogy – Promoting OER as tools that enable innovative teaching and learning approaches.
Student engagement through creation – Inviting students to contribute by updating or creating OER materials themselves.
Relevant to high-cost educational settings – Emphasizing the cost-saving benefit in regions with high textbook costs.
Appeal to student groups – Presenting OER as zero-cost resources, which directly benefits students financially.
Supporting pedagogical flexibility – Enabling faculty to reshape materials for specific course goals, beyond just using them as-is.
Instructor convenience – OER as a simple swap for commercial textbooks, without requiring adaptation.
Replacing costly textbooks with free versions – Using OER to lower student expenses without necessarily changing teaching approaches.
Permission to adapt and remix content – Encouraging educational freedom by allowing modifications to resources.
Primary focus on affordability – Emphasizing cost savings as the main benefit of OER.