Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!
Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem: Redefining Educational Authentici
Ambassador
Created on November 11, 2024
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Corporate Christmas Presentation
View
Business Results Presentation
View
Meeting Plan Presentation
View
Customer Service Manual
View
Business vision deck
View
Economic Presentation
View
Tech Presentation Mobile
Transcript
Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem
Redefining Educational Authneticity in the Digital Age
OLC ACCELERATE 2024
What we're talking about today
1. Get Acquainted
2. The Pinocchio Problem
3. Why This Matters
4. Pandemic Disruption
5. "Real" Learning
6. How Do We Build Now
7. Questions, Comments, Concerns, and Reactions
8th largest University by enrollment500+ QM Courses#1 Degrees to Hispanic students80+ IDs and Course Developers
Florida International University.
MaikelRight
Associate Director of Instructional Learning Technology
Faculty Fellow
You'll understand when you're a REAL parent
one that begets or brings forth offspring a person who brings up and cares for another
Yeah but it's an "online" class/degree/etc.
to gain knowledge or understanding of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience.
Online learning continues to grapple with a persistent question: can “real” learning truly happen in a virtual environment? This struggle stems from a deep-rooted perception that face-to-face instruction is the gold standard, often leading educators to measure the value of online learning against the benchmarks of traditional classrooms.
- Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem Defined
In an effort to legitimize online education, many seek to replicate in-person strategies and outcomes, inadvertently overlooking the unique strengths and potential of the digital learning space. This identity crisis limits the recognition of online learning as a distinct and impactful modality, capable of redefining accessibility, engagement, and the way we experience education.
- Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem Defined
Yeah but it's an "online" class/degree/etc.
to gain knowledge or understanding of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience.
Maybe You've Said
"Online learning works best for self-motivated students." "Online classes are great for covering the basics." "We’ve tried to replicate the classroom experience as much as possible online." "It's a great alternative for people who can't attend in-person classes."
VS
When You Could've Said
"Online learning fosters independence and supports all learners to succeed." "Online learning offers robust solutions for all levels, from basics to advanced." "Our online courses create experiences that go beyond traditional classrooms." "Online learning makes education accessible to everyone, everywhere."
Why the Pinnochio Problem Matters
Online learning improves employee performance by 15-25% and can increase student and employee retention by up to 50%
Confident faculty members are more likely to implement effective teaching practices, engage students, and provide better-structured learning opportunities
Traditional university enrollment has dropped by an average of 3%, while online universities have seen an 11% increase in digital enrollment
Building Faculty and Leadership Confidence
Legitimacy Drives Investment
Workforce Interest and Disruption
Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem impacts how online education is perceived, implemented, and valued
"We basically have to teach ourselves. It's like paying tuition to watch YouTube videos."
People now know who instructional designers are Faculty reported more skills and knowledge of online pedagogy and ed tech Faculty with less online experience perceived a greater negative effect of the pandemic on their teaching performance and showed less interest in future online teaching. After experiencing online learning, a majority of students (65% in one survey) expressed a preference for in-person classes.
Yeah but it's an "online" class/degree/etc.
to gain knowledge or understanding of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience.
Online is NOT face to face
Research inspired by book The Anxious Generationby Jonathan Haidt
01
02
03
Reduced Depth and Quality of Social Connections
Increased Anxiety and Social Comparison
Fragmented Attention and Reduced Focus
While technology allows for more frequent interaction, it doesn’t necessarily lead to meaningful connection.
Digital platforms often emphasize superficial qualities, intensifying the pressure to appear “perfect” and exacerbating stress.
Constant notifications and quick interactions train users for brief engagements rather than sustained focus.
Yeah but it's an "online" class/major/etc.
to gain knowledge or understanding of or skill in by study, instruction, or experience.
Face to Face answers for online learners
Extended Lectures Without Interaction
Rigid Scheduling and Lack of Flexibility
Minimal Use of Technology
Face-to-face courses often follow strict schedules to promote engagement and accountability.
Lengthy lectures may hold students' attention due to the physical presence of the instructor
Traditional teaching may rely heavily on in-person interactions with limited technological integration.
Limited Instructor Presence
In-Person Group Work Dynamics
Infrequent Feedback Cycles
In physical classrooms, the instructor's presence is naturally felt, whether one is engaging or not
Traditional group work relies on real-time interactions and our grading, especially, rubrics echo this
In traditional classes, feedback may be limited to periodic assessments because of prescence
In an effort to legitimize online education, many seek to replicate in-person strategies and outcomes, inadvertently overlooking the unique strengths and potential of the digital learning space. This identity crisis limits the recognition of online learning as a distinct and impactful modality, capable of redefining accessibility, engagement, and the way we experience education.
- Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem Defined
Online Learners Most Common Complaints
1. Perception of 'Busy Work'
2. Overemphasis on Discussion Boards
3. Limited Feedback and Support
4. Technical Issues and Accessibility
5. Lack of Real-Time Interaction
In an effort to legitimize online education, many seek to replicate in-person strategies and outcomes, inadvertently overlooking the unique strengths and potential of the digital learning space. This identity crisis limits the recognition of online learning as a distinct and impactful modality, capable of redefining accessibility, engagement, and the way we experience education.
- Online Learning's Pinocchio Problem Defined
Online Learning: Excelling Where Face-to-Face Falls Short
Different does not always mean less than.
01
02
03
04
The "New" Normal
Wicked Problems
Artificial Intelligence
Shrinking Enrollment
Personalized learning pathways, supported by adaptive technologies and the platforms that host them.
Asynchronous engagement, allowing students to reflect and respond thoughtfully rather than on the spot.
Flexibility and accessibility for learners with diverse schedules or physical challenges.
Students from different backgrounds can collaborate without geographical limitations.
5 Metrics for Online Learning Evaluation
Active Participation Rate: Tracks student interaction in forums, video responses, and other asynchronous activities, measuring engagement beyond simple attendance.
Self-Paced Progress: Measures student progress in completing self-paced modules, illustrating the learner’s autonomy and consistency.
Response Quality and Depth: Evaluates the quality of student contributions, showing thoughtfulness and engagement with course materials and peers.
Collaborative Interaction Quality: Assesses engagement in group projects, peer feedback, and interactive simulations, highlighting cooperative learning skills.
Reflective and Metacognitive Responses: Focuses on students’ reflections on their learning processes, encouraging a deeper self-awareness of their growth and challenges.
Take these slides with you
Any Questions?
Feel free to reach out to me through email at mright@fiu.edu or through LinkedIn
Anecdote: Imagine you’re in an online course where weekly discussion posts are a core part of participation. Every week, you see classmates sharing impressive, thoughtful posts with rich multimedia—images, videos, perfect formatting. You start to feel pressured, thinking, “Are my posts as good as theirs?” Over time, it becomes more about trying to match the appearance and “quality” of others’ posts rather than focusing on learning. In a face-to-face setting, casual chats and real-time feedback might reduce this pressure, allowing students to share ideas without constant comparison. Tangible Application: To alleviate this anxiety in online learning, courses could allow for more flexible and varied forms of participation, like voice notes, informal video responses, or optional collaborative posts where students work together instead of comparing individual posts. Instructors could also offer private, constructive feedback in place of public praise on certain posts, reducing the drive for social comparison and helping students focus on their own growth.
Anecdote: Picture a student, Alex, enrolled in an asynchronous course that offers a single two-hour recorded lecture each week. Alex plans to watch it on the weekend but, when the time comes, realizes it’s challenging to stay engaged for that long without the natural pauses or interactions that come with a live session. He finds himself pausing, rewinding, and losing focus, as there’s no built-in structure to help him absorb material in manageable segments. Without the accountability of a live class, staying focused becomes difficult. Tangible Application: In asynchronous learning, course material could be broken into shorter, digestible segments—such as 10-15 minute videos followed by interactive questions or reflective activities that promote active learning. Courses might include digital prompts or “checkpoints” that guide students through the material at a natural pace, allowing them to retain focus without feeling overwhelmed. Adding structured reflection points also encourages sustained engagement, which can often be lacking in lengthy asynchronous content.
Anecdote: Imagine you’re taking an online course where there’s a weekly discussion board. You’re tasked with responding to two classmates each week, so you quickly write something, glance at their posts, and then move on. Weeks pass, and you realize you’ve barely gotten to know anyone beyond a username and a few typed lines. Compare this to an in-person class where, through impromptu conversations before and after class, you get to know your peers—sometimes leading to friendships or study groups. Tangible Application: In online learning, this is why we need purposeful strategies for deeper interaction. Instead of simply requiring “two responses per post,” courses could prompt more intimate interactions like small, recurring peer groups or video journals, where students share reflections face-to-face on screen. These structured, consistent engagements cultivate a more genuine connection that mirrors, rather than replicates, in-person depth.
