RB03

Ryan Britland

Unit IPS03

Mark out to the required specification

JobS

annotated evidence/method statement

assessment plan/feedback/testimony

Tech tests and feedback report

Referencing

Toolbox talk

Job 2

Job 1

Preparation and Marking Process for Pipe Cutting and Modifications

Before starting, I made sure to gather all the necessary information, like the exact length of the pipe segment to be cut and any extra measurements needed for fittings or connections. I checked the engineering drawings, project plans, and specifications carefully to make sure everything was correct. Paying attention to the tolerances and allowances in the cutting process helped me achieve the right precision.I prepared the work area by ensuring it was clean, flat, and clear of any obstructions. I usually use a sturdy workbench and sometimes secure the pipe with clamps to keep it stable while marking and cutting.The first step was to establish a datum line on the pipe using a straightedge or level, which acted as a reference for accurate measurements along the pipe. Once everything was ready, I started marking out the pipe. I measured the required length carefully with a measuring tape, then made light, precise marks on the pipe’s surface with a scribe or marker, making sure they were clearly visible and lined up with the datum line. I double-checked my measurements before moving on to cutting, which helped avoid any errors.For additional features, like notches or bevels, I took the time to measure and mark those areas according to the specifications. After finishing the marking, I did a thorough inspection to make sure everything met the specified requirements, checking that measurements, alignment, and placement of marks were all accurate and in line with the datum.

Job 2

Pre-Cutting Preparation and Precise Marking Procedures for Pipe Work

Before beginning, I carefully gathered all the necessary information, including the exact length required for the pipe segment and any additional measurements needed for fittings or connections. I reviewed the engineering drawings, project plans, and specifications to confirm they were correct and in alignment. I paid close attention to specified tolerances and allowances to ensure the cutting would be precise and meet all requirements. I then prepared my work area, ensuring it was clean, organized, and flat. Working on a stable workbench, I used clamps to secure the pipe, providing stability for accurate marking and cutting. The initial step involved establishing a clear datum line on the pipe, using a straightedge or level to create a reliable reference for all subsequent measurements. With this reference in place, I proceeded to mark out the pipe. I carefully measured the required length with a measuring tape, making light, precise marks on the pipe’s surface with a scribe or marker. I ensured these marks aligned with the datum line to maintain accuracy. Double-checking my measurements before moving to cutting helped avoid any potential errors. For additional features, such as notches or bevels, I meticulously measured and marked those areas according to the specifications. After completing all markings, I performed a thorough inspection to verify that measurements, alignment, and all marks were accurate and consistent with the datum, confirming readiness for the cutting process.

Tech Test

IPS03 Mark out to the required specification

Results

Next

assesment plan

Unit Overview Unit Name: Mark Out to the Required Specification (IPS03) Pathways Applicable: All pathways (Pipefitting, Plating, Mechanical Fitting, Electrical Fitting) Learning Outcome: The candidate must understand the techniques used when marking out to specification and can safely and effectively mark out components. Assessment Methods Knowledge Assessment: Objective: Test the candidate's theoretical understanding of marking out techniques and requirements. Format: Multiple-choice and short-answer questions focusing on key concepts such as: Identification of correct versions of drawings and specifications. Principles, conventions, and uses of engineering drawings and related specifications. Surface preparation methods. Tools, methods, and techniques for marking out. Geometrical construction and pattern development methods. Practical Skills Assessment: Objective: Evaluate the candidate's ability to accurately mark out components according to specifications. Format: Observed tasks with criteria-based assessment, including: S3.1: Obtain and verify the correct information (drawings, specifications). S3.2: Prepare datum and marking surfaces, ensuring accuracy. S3.3: Use approved methods for marking out, demonstrating competence with tools. S3.4: Verify that markings comply with the specifications, correcting any errors identified.

Feedback

assesment plan

Portfolio of Evidence: Objective: Provide supporting evidence of skill application and consistency over time. Content: Samples of previous work with annotations explaining the marking-out process, challenges faced, and solutions. Technical Discussion: Objective: Assess deeper understanding and reflective thinking. Format: Structured interview with the assessor discussing: Interpretation of specifications and engineering drawings. Decision-making in tool selection and marking techniques. Approach to ensuring quality and compliance during marking out. Assessment Criteria To pass, candidates must: Demonstrate knowledge of marking-out methods and related technical information. Perform practical tasks safely and effectively, showing accuracy in following specifications. Provide clear explanations and justifications for their approach during the technical discussion. Resources Required Marking-out tools (e.g., scribers, rulers, calipers). Engineering drawings and specifications. Workspace prepared with surface preparation tools and materials.

Method Statement

Annotated evidence

Isometric drawing

Digital beings digital

Referencing

Assessor: Steve Smith Candidate: Ryan Britland Unit: IPS03 - Mark Out to the Required Specification Ryan demonstrated a thorough understanding and solid application of the skills required for marking out to the specified standards. He effectively gathered and verified all necessary information from the engineering drawings and project plans before beginning the work, ensuring accuracy from the outset. His attention to tolerances and allowances in the cutting process was clear, contributing to a high level of precision. Ryan also showed skill in preparing his work area, maintaining cleanliness, organization, and stability, which supported a safe and efficient workflow. His use of a datum line as a reference point was well-executed, enabling accurate measurements and alignment for marking. Throughout the marking process, Ryan utilized the correct tools with confidence, ensuring all marks aligned with the specifications. His final inspection was thorough, confirming that all measurements, alignment, and placements met the required standards. Ryan’s adherence to specifications and commitment to accuracy are commendable, and he has demonstrated readiness to take on further tasks with similar rigor.

Testimony

assessors feedback

03/04/23

I, Steve Burns, as a Witness to Ryan Britland’s assessment for IPS03, confirm that Ryan demonstrated strong competence in marking-out techniques. He prepared his workspace with care, selected and used the appropriate tools, and adhered to safety protocols throughout the task. Ryan’s ability to accurately interpret and apply specifications was evident in his meticulous approach. He demonstrated attention to detail, from establishing a precise datum line to ensuring all markings were correctly aligned to the required specifications. His focus on quality and safety was consistent throughout the process. Based on this observation, I am confident in Ryan’s growing expertise and look forward to seeing his continued progress as he develops his skills further. Witness signature: Steve Burns

Witness testimony

toolbox talk

Isometric Drawing

This is the technical drawing that was used when I fabricated and installed a stainless steel steam line.