Jigsaw quiz

Directions

1. Read the information regarding changes to CRDs and Evaluation Processes. 2. Answer 15 questions to assess your knowledge of the changes and reveal the hidden image. 3. Please be aware that many questions require you to scroll down to see all of the options. 4. Please use the links provided for each question to access the CRDs and Note Guides. 5. When you have completed the activity, drop the answer to the last question in your leadership chat for the opportunity to win Motivosity bucks!

Start

Next

Evaluation Puzzle

Putting It All Together: Learn About CRD Updates and Evaluation Processes The first ten EVs to complete the activity will win Motivosity Bucks!

Start

there are Changes in the world of evaluation

Locks

CRD Updates

Evaluation Notes

Task Instructions, Rubric Language, and Evaluation Notes

Updates to OPM 1, ORM 1, OPM 4, ORM 3, ORM 4,

To Lock, or Not to Lock?

Evaluation Notes in CRDs are updated frequently to include new procedures or provide clarification regarding scoring specific aspects.

Inconsistencies between the task instructions and the rubric.

When to lock a submission and when to contact leadership.

Next

View an Example

Question 1/15

Open ORM5 Task 1 CRD

Question 2/15

Question 3/15

Question 4/15

Question 5/15

Open OPM4 Task 1 CRD

Question 6/15

Open ORM5 Task 3 CRD

Question 7/15

Open OPM4 Task 4 CRD

Question 8/15

Open ORM5 Task 4 CRD

Question 9/15

Note Guide

Question 10/15

Click Here to View Notes

Question 11/15

Click Here to View Notes

Question 12/15

Question 13/15

Question 14/15

Click Here to View Notes

Question 15/15

Click Here to View Notes

Congratulations!

Be one of the first ten participants to drop the title of the movie in your leadership chat to win Motivosity Bucks!

When To Lock When Contacting Leadership is Not Required:

Lock even first attempts when misalignment is prevalent (especially when it is apparent the student mixes applied and action or when they mix two different types of applied projects).

Lock even first attempts when the RQ does not align with the research type.

Lock most of the time when the instrument is not present or it is misaligned with the RQ or methods.

Lock and Contact Leadership When:

An aspect has previously passed that should not have passed. This may be on attempts 2 or more. It may be on a subsequent task (task 3, 4, or 5).

Don't assume that it was previously passed. Student go rogue and change their methodology and data collection after it was approved in Tasks 1 & 2.

Dispositions/Fast-Finisher Concerns:

We must hold the student accountable to the timeline approved in Task 2 and Task 3. Please see the addition to the ORM Task 4 CRD: "As you begin your evaluation of Chapter 4, please CHECK THE DATES of approval in Task 2 and the timeline in Tasks 1 and Task 3. If there are discrepancies between the approval and the timeline (i.e., there has not been enough time passed to complete the project), follow the fast-finisher guidelines.

There are inconsistencies between the task instructions and the rubric.

Task Instructions, Rubric Language, and Evaluation Notes

Please understand that the "Evaluation Notes" are the ONLY part of the CRD that we can change.

These performance assessments were written for action research studies. Someone (before us) made the decision to keep the same rubrics for applied projects.

There are areas of misalignment between the task directions and rubric. The evaluation notes serve as a guide to help us interpret the rubric appropriately and must be followed to ensure calibration.

This is why the Evaluation Notes are VERY specific about how to score each aspect. They account for inconsistencies in the task instructions and rubric that we cannot change.

However, we still have to follow stoplight feedback requirements when writing feedback.

A change to the task instructions or rubric require full assessment redevelopment or a live change which involves assessment developers.

This has created inconsistencies between the task instructions and the rubric.

Example of Discrepencies in OPM Task 4

Aspect B1: Participants

Task Instructions include the Note: "If you are proposing an action research study with an instructional unit, plan for a minimum of five active participants." The rubric states, "The submission describes participants or stakeholders as applicable to the type of capstone research, including the number and at least 2 relevant characteristics." The Evaluation Notes: Students are asked to plan for five participants in the task instructions, but they are not required to have five participants. Do not fail for less than 5 participants. Notice that the evaluation notes clarify the inconsistencies.

Always follow the Evaluation Notes.

ORM Task 1 Updates

Aspect A7b: Alignment between the data collection instruments and research question(s).Aspect A8: T-Tests as a Data Analysis Technique

OPM Task 1 Updates

Aspect A6: Bias in Applied Research

ORM Task 3 Updates

Aspect D3: Inappropriately passed in ORM Task 1Aspect D3b: Non-Exempt Studies

OPM Task 4 Updates

Aspect B3: Pre-existing surveysAspect C: T-tests as a Data Analysis Technique

ORM Task 4 Updates

Aspect B: Control groups/surveys inappropriately passed