Student progress report 23-24

Student Progress Report

Analysis of Pre- and Post-Assessment Scores 2023-2024

start

Student progress report

Objectives of the Analysis

1. Evaluate Learning Progress

3. Compare Pre- and Post-Assessments

Assess the performance of students in grades 1 to 8 in Math.

Measure improvement by comparing pre-assessment and post-assessment scores for each student.

2. Identify Strengths and Weaknesses

4. Highlight Key Challenges

Identify difficult questions and patterns in student responses to guide future teaching strategies.

Pinpoint areas where students are excelling and those where additional instruction may be necessary.

Student progress report

Post-assessment participation by grade

Pre-assessment participation by grade

61

Total

Total

32

Student progress report

Grade 1 Math Performance Analysis

Questions with highest correct responses: Q1, Q3, Q4, Q6

Average score of the class: 60%

Indicating a moderate understanding of the material.

All 5 students (5/5) answered these questions correctly, showing these concepts were well understood.

Questions where over half of the responses were incorrect : Q8, Q9, Q13, Q15, Q18, Q19, Q20

Questions with highest incorrect responses: Q18

These questions had more than half of the students answering incorrectly, indicating significant challenges with these topics.

All 5 students (5/5) answered this question incorrectly, highlighting an area that needs more focus.

Student progress report

Key Insights

• Successfully read and wrote numerals within the 120 range.
• Correctly represented numbers of objects with written numerals.

STRENGTH

• Partition shapes into halves, fourths, and quarters, and understand that more equal shares create smaller shares.
• Understand tens: Recognize numbers like 10, 20, 30, etc., as groups of tens with zero ones.
• Add within 100: Add a two-digit number to a one-digit or a multiple of 10, using place value and concrete models.
• Mentally find 10 more or 10 less than a given two-digit number and explain the reasoning.

WEAKNESS

Student progress report

Performance Patterns: Difficulty Index and Correlation

Correlation between questions

Relative difficulty of each question

• Blue: Strong correlation

• Red: Weak correlation

Student progress report

Q7: Counting to 120, and reading, writing, and representing numerals. Q11: Comparing Two-Digit Numbers - Understanding and using symbols >, =, and < to compare numbers.

INSIGHT

Students who were able to understand place value, particularly the relationship between tens and ones, demonstrated success in both comparing numbers and counting or working with numerals.

RECCOMMENDTION

Design exercises that connect number comparison with counting and numeral writing to build a deeper, integrated understanding.

Student progress report

Average performance across grades: Pre-assessment

Student progress report

Comparing Pre & Post scores

1st grade

2nd grade

Student progress report

Comparing Pre & Post scores

4th grade

3rd grade

No students from 4th grade wrote the post-assessment exam!!!

Student progress report

Comparing Pre & Post scores

5th grade

6th grade

Student progress report

Comparing Pre & Post scores

7th grade

8th grade

Student progress report

Pre-assessment results

Post-assessment results

Student progress report

F in Pre

F in Post

Missed Post-Assessment

7/32

18/61

29/61

Students who showed improvement

Students who's performance decreased

F in Both exams

7/32

19/32

4/32

Student progress report

With 29 students missing the post-assessment, it's important to investigate the reasons for their absence. Teachers should follow up with these students and their families. Consider make-up sessions.

Reccommendations

Grade 5 students showed excellent mastery in both pre- and post-assessments. Consider analyzing the instructional strategies used in Grade 5 and applying them to other grades that faced challenges, such as Grade 6.

With 18 students scoring an F in the pre-assessment and 7 scoring an F in the post-assessment (4 of whom scored F in both), these students likely need intensive support. Teachers should consider:

• Remedial Programs
• Individual Learning Plans