War on Poverty: What it got wrong | IN 60 SECONDS
President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty had some important successes, but it got at least one thing very wrong: Its leaders used the language of civil rights to talk about income and poverty. Financial assistance from the government is not a right! It's not protected by the Constitution like religious freedom or freedom of speech. Using the language of rights led to two big mistakes. First, it told people in need that they had no role in improving their economic situation; the government would take care of everything. And second, it led to a misguided effort to use Congress and federal courts to impose uniform anti-poverty policies on every state. Helping people struggling with poverty doesn't work that way! Individual responsibility plays a role. It's not always sufficient – but it is essential – and federal mandates often mean decision makers are too far removedfrom what is happening in cities and states. Our anti-poverty programs work best when we insist on some effort by those seeking assistance, and we allow states to devise the best approaches.What do you think about Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty?
War on Poverty
Татьяна Яблокова
Created on September 10, 2024
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Essential Interactive Card
View
Happy Holidays Mobile Card
View
Christmas Invitation
View
Professional Christmas Greeting
View
Christmas present card
View
Holiday Card
View
Vintage Holiday Card
Explore all templates
Transcript
War on Poverty: What it got wrong | IN 60 SECONDS
President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty had some important successes, but it got at least one thing very wrong: Its leaders used the language of civil rights to talk about income and poverty. Financial assistance from the government is not a right! It's not protected by the Constitution like religious freedom or freedom of speech. Using the language of rights led to two big mistakes. First, it told people in need that they had no role in improving their economic situation; the government would take care of everything. And second, it led to a misguided effort to use Congress and federal courts to impose uniform anti-poverty policies on every state. Helping people struggling with poverty doesn't work that way! Individual responsibility plays a role. It's not always sufficient – but it is essential – and federal mandates often mean decision makers are too far removedfrom what is happening in cities and states. Our anti-poverty programs work best when we insist on some effort by those seeking assistance, and we allow states to devise the best approaches.What do you think about Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty?