SAEE 2024 - Supporting Student Participation in Experiential Learning
Christina Manceor
Created on March 13, 2024
Over 30 million people build interactive content in Genially.
Check out what others have designed:
ANCIENT EGYPT FOR KIDS PRESENTATION
Presentation
A GLIMPSE INTO CAPE TOWN’S PAST
Presentation
ALTERNATIVE DIETS
Presentation
MUSIC PROJECT
Presentation
Coca-Cola Real Magic
Presentation
GEO PROJECT (SINGAPORE)
Presentation
THE LITTLE PRINCE PRESENTATION
Presentation
Transcript
How to Support Student Participation in Extracurricular Experiential Learning
Presented by Christina Manceor, MM
Start
Overview
Positionality & Context
Experiential Learning in the Arts
Literature Review
Mixed Methods Study
Takeaways for Educators
What's Next?
Freelance percussionist
Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University
- Assistant Director of LAUNCHPad (career services)
- Adjunct Faculty of Professional Studies
Positionality
Peabody Conservatory of the Johns Hopkins University
- Performing arts conservatory(music and dance)
- Baltimore, Maryland
- 815 students (undergraduate, graduate, doctoral)
- Breakthrough Plan
+ info
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (2014)
Image from the Institute for Experiential Learning. https://experientiallearninginstitute.org/resources/what-is-experiential-learning
Defining Experiential Learning
- Educational technique that incorporates direct interaction with a scenario as opposed to more theoretical or hypothetical approaches (Keeton and Tate, 1978)
- Ultimately adds “a direct experience component to [students’] traditional academic studies” (Kolb, 2014, p. xviii)
Slaughter & Springer (2015)
Kolb (2014)Slaughter & Springer (2015)
Bartleet et al. (2019)Frenette (2020)MIller et al. (2017)
Munnelly (2020)
Many institutions are launching experiential learning programs
Skill building, real world experience, and connections to close gaps
Artists lack non-artistic skills ( e.g. enetrepreneurship, business, etc.)
SCHOOLS CREATING NEW PROGRAMS
EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
HIGHER ED SKILLS GAPS
Rise of portfolio careers and freelancing in the 21st century arts industry
EVOLVING ARTS INDUSTRY
Experiential Learning: What We Know
How can we ensure experiential learning programs are structured to be equitable and accessible to all students?
Experiential Learning: What We Don't Know
There is much we don’t know. Since many programs are relatively new, minimal research exists relating to student participation and outcomes in the arts.
DETAILS
Limited arts-specific researchUtilized experiential learning research from a variety of fieldsReferenced music and arts-specific studies when availableDrew from research on participation/engagement in various extracurricular activities
Literature Review
Supports and Barriers to Extracurricular Experiential Learning Participation
Situated within a students' surrounding environmentand social systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1979)
Factors of Interest
What supports and barriers contribute to student participation in extracurricular experiential learning programs, particularly for different demographic groups?
Research Study: Questions and Framework
Mixed Methods Approach
with emphasis on qualitative data
Part I:Interviews
6 students
Part II:Focus Group
3 students
Demographic Survey
9 students
Findings
There are a variety of supports and barriers impacting students’ program knowledge, participation and likelihood or ability to apply to programs.
Both
Barriers
Supports
Learning About Programs
Awareness
Discomfort asking questions
Promotion
Curricular integration
Faculty & Peer Influence
Socioeconomic status and parental support
Proximity to the institution
Not applicable to student
Applicable to student
Motivation
Both
Barriers
Supports
Prioritization & Incentive to Pursue Programs
Compensation
Time and availability
Cultural values and beliefs
Both
Barriers
Supports
Applying to Programs
Short turnaround to apply
Prerequisites & self-efficacy
Curricular integration
Prior experience
Program Design
- Maximize alignment with student motivations
- Offer opportunities for all degree types and majors
- Present chances to build relationships with peers and professionals
- Minimize logistical challenges
- Build engagements that are one-off or limited in time frame
- Prioritize opportunities on or near campus to minimize transportation needs
- Provide compensation
- Support students' self-efficacy
- Create scaffolded pipelines and clear pathways to build skills/experiences
Takeaways for Educators:
Promotion
- Promote early and often; use multiple online platforms (e.g. social media, email, newsletters, online job posting platforms, etc.)
- Post paper flyers with QR code links in high traffic areas
- Conduct catered outreach through faculty, staff, and student organizations to facilitate direct connections
- Engage faculty and student advocates
- Advertise through curricular courses
- Include sufficient detail in promotional materials
- Time commitment, location, networking opportunities
Takeaways for Educators:
Takeaways for Educators
Most importantly: Get to know your specific audience!This was a smaller scale study in a particular environment. While many ideas are probably transferable, different populations and schools with different programs may have different factors that impact their experience.
What's Next?
Creating and Validating the Experiential Learning Participation Survey
Industry Impacts
Interested to Learn More?
Scan the QR code and join my mailing list to:
- Stay in touch
- Learn more about the Experiential Learning Participation Survey
- Recieve updates on findings!
View slides!Stay in touch: cmanceor@jhu.edu
Questions?
Thank you!
Avis, R. (2020). Higher music education, India and ethnography: A case study of KM music conservatory students. Ethnomusicology Forum, 29(2), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2020.1850316 Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606 Bartleet, B-L., Ballico, C., Bennett, D., Bridgstock, R., Draper, P., Tomlinson, V., & Harrison, S. (2019). Building sustainable portfolio careers in music: insights and implications for higher education. Music Education Research, 21(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2019.1598348Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. Choi, J. (2013). Attitudes of international music students from East Asia toward US higher education institutions. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 346–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0255761411433719 Coker, J. S. & Porter, D. J. (2015). Maximizing experiential learning for student success. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.996101Colucci, E. (2007). “Focus groups can be fun:” The use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308129Creech, A., Papageorgi, I., Duffy, C., Morton, F., Haddon, E., Potter, J., de Bezenac, C., Whyton, T., Himonides, E., & Welch, G. (2008). From music student to professional: The process of transition. British Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051708008127Dickinson, J., Griffiths, T., & Bredice, A. (2021). “It’s just another thing to think about:” Encouraging students’ engagement in extracurricular activities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(6), 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1813263
References
Duo Sila. (2022, March 11). Clair de lune (arr. for flute and vibraphone) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/JX2Dl-SnlCoFrenette, A. (2020). SNAAP DataBrief: Which skills do founders and freelancers need? Unpacking the entrepreneurial skills gap (Vol. 8, No. 1). Strategic National Arts Alumni Project. https://mailchi.mp/7b1b1cb9b32e/snaap-databrief-august-12511464?e=bbecf41af2Gaunt, H. (2011). Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in higher education: Comparing student and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 159–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265051711000052 Gonzalez-Moreno, P. (2012). Student motivation in graduate music programmes: An examination of personal and environmental factors. Music Education Research, 14(1), 79–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2012.657168 Griffiths, T., Dickinson, J., & Day, C. J. (2021). Exploring the relationship between extracurricular activities and student self-efficacy within university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1294–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1951687Hamilton, L., Roksa, J., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Providing a "leg up”: Parental involvement and opportunity hoarding in college. Sociology of Education, 91(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718759557 Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108 Hughes, J. L., Camden, A. A., & Yangchen, T. (2016). Rethinking and updating demographic questions: Guidance to improve descriptions of research samples. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 21(3), 138–151.Johns Hopkins University. (n.d.-a). Academic catalog, 2021-22 edition: Peabody Institute. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://e-catalogue.jhu.edu/peabodyKolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson FT Press.
References (cont.)
Martin et al. (2023)Miller (2016)Miller, A. L., Dumford, A. D., & Johnson, W. R. (2017). Music alumni play a different tune: Reflections on acquired skills and career outcomes. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 18(29), 1–21. http://www.ijea.org/v18n29Munnelly, K. P. (2020). The undergraduate music degree: Artistry or employability? Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 50(4/5), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2020.1756549Peabody Institute. (2023). Breakthrough plan. https://peabody.jhu.edu/explore-peabody/breakthrough-planPeabody LAUNCHPad. (2021). Peabody LAUNCHPad annual report – FY 2021. Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University.Roksa, J., & Silver, B. R. (2019). "Do-It-Yourself" University: Institutional and family support in the transition out of college. The Review of Higher Education 42(3), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0029Slaughter, J., & Springer, D. G. (2015). What they didn’t teach me in my undergraduate degree: An exploratory study of graduate student musicians’ expressed opinions of career development opportunities. College Music Symposium, 55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26574402Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1178Wasserman, I. C., & Kram, K. E. (2009). Enacting the scholar-practitioner role: An exploration of narratives. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308327238
References (cont.)
Benefits of Experiential Learning
Experiential learning in arts higher education helps students develop key skills and gain tangible experiences that may prepare them for their future careers.(Kindelan, 2010; Slaughter & Springer, 2015)
- Learning transfer – taking curricular learning to new settings(Eyler, 2009; Beckman, 2007)
- Building skills critical to portfolio careers(Beckman, 2007; Gallagher & McGorry, 2015)
- Forming industry connections and mentor relationships(Myers, 2006; Frenette et al., 2015)
- Finding jobs more quickly after graduation(Martin & Frenette, 2018)
Roksa & Silver (2019); Turner (2010)
Part I: Interviews
30-45 minute semi-structured interviews (qualitative)
- 3 undergraduate students
- 3 graduate students
- Audio-recorded Zoom interviews
Higher Education Arts Institutions Begin to Launch Experiential Learning Programs
Maintaining tradition and excellence while adapting to changes across the arts industry to prepare students for 21st century arts careers
Breakthrough Plan
Hughes et al. (2016); Johns Hopkins University (n.d.-a)
Demographic Survey
Brief online survey (quantitative)
- Administered to each interview and focus group participant post-session
- 7 multiple choice and text response questions
- Conducted via Qualtrics
- Connected to interview/focus group data for analysis
Colucci (2007); Dickinson et al. (2021)
Part II: Focus Group
1-hour focus group (qualitative)Further exploring interview findings
- 1 undergraduate student
- 2 graduate students
- Audio-recorded in-person session