Affaire hattab-sarraud-subra

PRESENTATION

The Hattab-Sarraud-Subra affair

START

sUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

1 . facts

4 . Comparative law

5 . Personnal point of view/opnion

2 . Legal proceedings

3 . Why we chose it

6 . Conclusion

FACTS

France

December 1984: Valérie Subra, Laurent Hattab, and Jean-Rémi Sarraud devised a scheme to lure, rob, and murder wealthy men. Victims: Gérard Le Laidier (lawyer) - december 7, 1984 & Laurent Zarade (fashion executive) - December 16, 1984 Modus operandi: Subra acted as bait, Hattab and Sarraud ambushed the victims. Arrest: December 20, 1984, before more crimes could be committed.

A trial opposing ...

Proceedings

Hattab & Sarraud & Subra

Paris Assize Court

Info

WHy we chose it

Youth delinquency & criminal responsibility Materialism's impact on crime Media influence on public perception Connection to modern crimes involving social media & online luring

Comparative law

- Comparative analysis : Different countries handle criminal cases in varied ways. ex: USA (Amy Fisher, 1993): parole for young offenders + Focus on rehabilitation rahter then lifleong incarceration ex:Germany (Lonely Hearts Killer, 2008): Life imprisonment with preventive detention. could remain incarcerated indefinitely if threat. - This concept of preventive detention could be applied to the Hattab-Sarraud-Subra case for public safety.

P e r s o n a l p o i n t o f v i e w

Media labeled Subra "diabolical beauty," shaping biased perceptions. Gender biases in crime reporting. Should young offenders be treated as adults? Justice must balance punishment with potential rehabilitation..

Info

Conclusion

The case raises debates on sentencing young criminals, punishment vs. rehabilitation.

Media plays a crucial role in shaping legal narratives.

Reflect societal issues + impact of materialism + responsability of the community Justice was served + lesson for futue (young indivduals + crime)

sOURCES OF INFORMATION

• LeMonde.fr
• LeFigaro.fr
• LePoint.fr
• SceneDeCrime.com

Thanks!

Aller à la page

O P I N I O N- Moral and social standpoint: highlights unckecked materialism, youth manipulation, glorification of wealth. - Trio : motivated by financial gain + targeting perceived affluence - Lack of moral values & obsession with wealth. - Muder = more common = society failling to instill ethical values - Education and moral guidance are key to prevention. - Justice system ensures accountability but cannot fix societal roots of crime.

-January 1988: Paris Assize Court -Charges: Premeditated murder, robbery with violence, breaking and entering. -The most severe sentencing -Sentences: Hattab & Sarraud - Life (18 years minimum), Subra - Life (16 years minimum) -Legal Issue: their actions justified the most sever punishment -Aggravated offense under Articles 221-3 & 311-10 of the French Penal Code = life imprsionment - The court emphasized = meticulously planned = full awarneness -Severity justified -Justice served as strict