UNIT 1
Argumentation
Let’s talk about sustainable development
be able to
- To increase knowledge of the participants in the field of sustainable development;
- To discuss most actual questions connected with the issue of sustainable development and support sharing and exchanging ideas and opinions;
- To develop communication and presentation skills of the participants and support their active involvement in the project.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
METHOD 1
Group work
MATERIALS
Quote statements
- The trainer divides the group into smaller subgroups (ideally, max 4 persons per sub-group).
- Each group is secretly assigned to a role play (they must not reveal it to the rest of the teams)
The role plays are:
CONTENT 1
CONTENT 1
Panelist Group 1 (Pro-Sustainability Advocate):
It is a group formed by renowned environmental scientists who firmly believe in the principles of sustainability. They argue that adopting sustainable practices is essential to ensure the well-being of current and future generations. Based on data, they emphasize the importance of reducing carbon emissions, conserving natural resources, and promoting renewable energy sources. They point to success stories of companies and communities that have thrived by integrating sustainable practices into their operations.
Panelist Group 2 (Critical Voice):
It is a group composed of prominent economists, presenting a critical viewpoint on sustainability. They acknowledge its significance but express concerns about the economic implications of abrupt transitions, based on data. They argue that immediate shifts to sustainable practices might lead to job losses in industries that rely heavily on non-renewable resources. They suggest that a more gradual approach, coupled with economic incentives, would be more feasible and less disruptive to the workforce.
CONTENT 1
Panelist Group 3 (Environmental Activist):
It is a group of environmental activists who passionately support sustainability efforts. They counter the concerns raised by the critical voice, asserting that the urgency of climate change demands swift action. They stress that embracing sustainability can open up new avenues for innovation and job creation in green industries. They cite examples of regions that have successfully transitioned to clean energy sources, fostering economic growth while reducing their carbon footprint.
Panelist Group 4 (Economic Analyst):
In this group, you have economic analysts, who offer a pragmatic perspective. They acknowledge both sides of the debate and propose a balanced approach. They emphasize the need for carefully planned policies that balance environmental conservation with economic stability. They suggest that investing in research and development of sustainable technologies can lead to a win-win scenario where environmental benefits are coupled with economic gains.
CONTENT 1
The trainer gives 5 minutes to discuss in group (possibly whispering, so that the other groups do not grasp whom they will be confronting) so that each group ‘adopts’ a certain behaviour, or what they imagine their reaction would be if they invest the assigned roles.
3. The trainer reads out loud the first statement and gives 5 minutes to each group to define a discussion strategy.
4. After that the trainer opens the debate time. It is crucial to take notes, and to make the debate continue.
5. The role of the trainer is to moderate the debate, and make sure everyone is involved in the most equitable manner (e.g. if a group is not involved enough, or if someone of a group is not able to participate etc)
6. At the end of the 15-minute discussion, the trainer debriefs the discussion:
- the most interesting thoughts
- the critical points
it is crucial from the trainer’s point of view to make sure that the argumentation points and the counter-argumentation points are clear (argumentation must be carried out on the basis of claims, data and justifications), where everyone acquires good understanding of the complexity of the topics.
Further debate lines:
Statement 8: Encouraging sustainable consumer behaviors necessitates a combination of education, incentives, and accessible eco-friendly alternatives.
CONTENT 1
Statement 9: Businesses respond more effectively to market incentives than to strict regulations when it comes to adopting sustainable practices.
Statement 10: Global collaboration is crucial for tackling sustainability challenges, but local initiatives tailored to specific contexts also play a significant role.
Statement 11: Measuring success in sustainability requires a comprehensive assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts, using diverse metrics.
CONTENT 1
ESTIMATED TIME FRAME
45 minutes
KEYWORDS
Sustainability, critical thinking, environmental transition
- Change requires complex thinking
- Sustainability must be a shared global goal
- Sustainability is not just about environment, but it encompasses elements of economy, society and labour.
SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS
Module-3 Argumentation 1
Eco-Smart Schools
Created on February 6, 2024
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Visual Presentation
View
Terrazzo Presentation
View
Colorful Presentation
View
Modular Structure Presentation
View
Chromatic Presentation
View
City Presentation
View
News Presentation
Explore all templates
Transcript
UNIT 1
Argumentation
Let’s talk about sustainable development
be able to
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
METHOD 1
Group work
MATERIALS
Quote statements
- The trainer divides the group into smaller subgroups (ideally, max 4 persons per sub-group).
- Each group is secretly assigned to a role play (they must not reveal it to the rest of the teams)
The role plays are:CONTENT 1
CONTENT 1
Panelist Group 1 (Pro-Sustainability Advocate): It is a group formed by renowned environmental scientists who firmly believe in the principles of sustainability. They argue that adopting sustainable practices is essential to ensure the well-being of current and future generations. Based on data, they emphasize the importance of reducing carbon emissions, conserving natural resources, and promoting renewable energy sources. They point to success stories of companies and communities that have thrived by integrating sustainable practices into their operations. Panelist Group 2 (Critical Voice): It is a group composed of prominent economists, presenting a critical viewpoint on sustainability. They acknowledge its significance but express concerns about the economic implications of abrupt transitions, based on data. They argue that immediate shifts to sustainable practices might lead to job losses in industries that rely heavily on non-renewable resources. They suggest that a more gradual approach, coupled with economic incentives, would be more feasible and less disruptive to the workforce.
CONTENT 1
Panelist Group 3 (Environmental Activist): It is a group of environmental activists who passionately support sustainability efforts. They counter the concerns raised by the critical voice, asserting that the urgency of climate change demands swift action. They stress that embracing sustainability can open up new avenues for innovation and job creation in green industries. They cite examples of regions that have successfully transitioned to clean energy sources, fostering economic growth while reducing their carbon footprint. Panelist Group 4 (Economic Analyst): In this group, you have economic analysts, who offer a pragmatic perspective. They acknowledge both sides of the debate and propose a balanced approach. They emphasize the need for carefully planned policies that balance environmental conservation with economic stability. They suggest that investing in research and development of sustainable technologies can lead to a win-win scenario where environmental benefits are coupled with economic gains.
CONTENT 1
The trainer gives 5 minutes to discuss in group (possibly whispering, so that the other groups do not grasp whom they will be confronting) so that each group ‘adopts’ a certain behaviour, or what they imagine their reaction would be if they invest the assigned roles. 3. The trainer reads out loud the first statement and gives 5 minutes to each group to define a discussion strategy. 4. After that the trainer opens the debate time. It is crucial to take notes, and to make the debate continue. 5. The role of the trainer is to moderate the debate, and make sure everyone is involved in the most equitable manner (e.g. if a group is not involved enough, or if someone of a group is not able to participate etc)
6. At the end of the 15-minute discussion, the trainer debriefs the discussion: - the most interesting thoughts - the critical points it is crucial from the trainer’s point of view to make sure that the argumentation points and the counter-argumentation points are clear (argumentation must be carried out on the basis of claims, data and justifications), where everyone acquires good understanding of the complexity of the topics. Further debate lines: Statement 8: Encouraging sustainable consumer behaviors necessitates a combination of education, incentives, and accessible eco-friendly alternatives.
CONTENT 1
Statement 9: Businesses respond more effectively to market incentives than to strict regulations when it comes to adopting sustainable practices. Statement 10: Global collaboration is crucial for tackling sustainability challenges, but local initiatives tailored to specific contexts also play a significant role. Statement 11: Measuring success in sustainability requires a comprehensive assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts, using diverse metrics.
CONTENT 1
ESTIMATED TIME FRAME
45 minutes
KEYWORDS
Sustainability, critical thinking, environmental transition
SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS