Bioethics
- Definition: Ethics that, considering scientific data, rationally analyzes the morality of human intervention on human life and on the environment.
- Objects: Material- moral dimension/ Formal-reason
Ethics ≠ Legality: laws should always protect human goods and coincide with the contents of ethics. However, unethical practices were allowed by law in the past (e.g. slavery) and today. Some actions might be legal, but not ethical.
Ethics ≠ Technical Possibility: not everything technically possible, is ethically good and convenient for the human being and the planet (e.g. nuclear weapons).
Lílian Santos
lilian.santos@upra.org
Introduction to Global Bioethics
1927
Fritz Jahr "Bioethik"
1960s
Medical advances
1969
Daniel John CallahanHastings Center
1971
Potter “Bioethics: brigde to the future”
Hellegers Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University
1978
IVF
1979
Tom Beauchamp - James Childress "Principles of Biomedical Ethics"
1988
Potter "Global Bioethics"
2003
Human Genome Project
2005
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
2010-
NBIC Technologies
GAP 90/10
Exclusive: World’s first baby born with new “3 parent” technique
Info
Nebraska grandmother acts as surrogate for gay son
Google Baby
Homem trans engravida para realizar sonho do casal de ter filho
Info
Info
Info
Twins born from embryos frozen 30 years ago
I can't let go of my remaining embryos
Brasil: Vale vai pagar 7 mil milhões de dólares pela tragédia de Brumadinho em 2019
Info
Info
Migrantes climáticos
Info
Sequías y bioética
CRISPR-Cas9
Emmanuelle Charpentier - Jennifer Doudna 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
He Jiankui and the first CRISPR babies
Japan approves first human-animal embryo experiments
Info
Scientists grow whole model of human embryo, without sperm or egg
Info
The Internet of Bodies Will Change Everything, for Better or Worse
Info
Biohackers, cyborgs, DIYbio
Transhumanism: Meet the cyborgs and biohackers redefining beauty
Info
Biohacking and Transhumanism
Article
What?DIYbio
Conclusion
Why? H+
Is it right?Bioethics and Governance
DIY strongly exemplifies transhumanist behaviour (cf. Natasha Vita-More, 2019).
Models and Method
- Currents of thought in Bioethics
- Methodology
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
01
Actions are good insofar as they promote pleasure and avoid pain.
in Bioethics
02
Good: more pleasure, less pain for as many people as possible.
Consequences
03
When a being is not capable of suffering and enjoyment, there is nothing to take into account.
Principalism
step 1
Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in
JUSTICE
AUTONOMY
BENEFICENCE
NON MALEFICENCE
+info
Personalism
04
03
02
01
Freedom and Responsability
Sociability and Subsidiarity
Totality and Therapy
Defence of physical life
- Sgreccia, E. (1994). Manuale di bioetica. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero. p. 171–180.
- Quintana, C. (2011). Sgreccia: una bioética católica [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10/02/17 en http://www.bioeticadesdeasturias.com/2011/12/esgreccia-una-bioetica-catolica.html
Principlism vs Personalism
Principlist stance:
- There is no reference anthropology to justify the principles, establish an order between them and thus resolve the conflicts of duties and problematic cases.
- Principles and specifications are not absolute but always prima facie: their binding nature is relative to the occurrence of what is understood to be a greater obligation.
Personalist stance:
- Founded in classical Thomism and contemporary personalism.
- It promotes the integral good of the human person.
- It needs to continue to expand and develop as a rational (and not a theological) model.
- Philosophical analysis has to be adapted to the bioethical environment (dealing with people who may not be in their full condition).
García, J. J. (2012). Bioética Personalista y Bioética Principialista. Perspectivas [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://www.bioeticaweb.com/bioactica-personalista-y-bioactica-principialista-perspectivas/
Quintana, C. (2011). Sgreccia: una bioética católica [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://www.bioeticadesdeasturias.com/2011/12/esgreccia-una-bioetica-catolica.html
Triangular Method
Global Bioethics (global in scope and content)
Anthropological-valuative reading
Bioethical situation-question
Ethical and normative elaboration
Scientific fact
- Physical, corporeal life is the fundamental value of the person because the person cannot exist except in a body as co-essential to the person, i.e. as the sole and necessary basis for his or her existence in time and space.
- Nor can freedom exist without physical life: to be free and to have human rights it is necessary to be alive. One cannot be free and defend basic rights if one does not have life. Life comes before freedom. Therefore, when freedom suppresses life it is a freedom that suppresses itself and, consequently, eliminates the basis of human rights.
- Only the total and spiritual good of the person is above the value of physical life.
- It encompasses the concept that the person is free, but is free to achieve the good of himself and the good of others and of the whole world, for the world has been entrusted to human responsibility.
- Freedom cannot be exercised without exercising responsibility. A bioethics of responsibility towards other people, towards oneself and, above all, towards one's own life, the life of other people and the life of other living beings must be pursued.
- However, as stated in the first principle, the right to the defence of life has priority over the right to freedom, that is to say, in order to be free it is essential to be alive because life is a necessary condition for the exercise of freedom.
Principles of Personalist Bioethics
- Defence of physical life: one cannot exist, be free, have human rights without life;
- Freedom and responsibility: achieving individual and collective good.
- Totality and therapy: the organism is organically unified. It is permissible to intervene on one part in order to save the whole organism;
- Sociability and subsidiarity: life is a social good, not just an individual one. Society must help without substituting individual initiatives. It implies solidarity;
Cf. Sgreccia, E. (1994) Manuale di Bioetica. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero. p. 171–180.
FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONALIST PHILOSOPHY
- From what to who: not a thing but an unrepeatable individual subject
- Three-dimensional structure of the person: body, psyche and spirit.autonomous
- original and structural character of affectivity.
- Interpersonal relations: dialogicality of the world.
- Primacy of freedom and love.
- Corporeality. Sexuality. Man as male and female.
- Other features: the narrative character of the person, the relevance of subjectivity, etc.
Burgos, J. (2011). Filosofía personalista como fundamento de la Bioética personalista [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://enciclopediadebioetica.com/index.php/todas-las-voces/189-la-filosofia-personalista-como-fundamento-de-la-bioetica-personalista
Principles of Personalist Bioethics
- Defence of physical life: one cannot exist, be free, have human rights without life;
- Freedom and responsibility: achieving individual and collective good.
- Totality and therapy: the organism is organically unified. It is permissible to intervene on one part in order to save the whole organism;
- Sociability and subsidiarity: life is a social good, not just an individual one. Society must help without substituting individual initiatives. It implies solidarity;
Cf. Sgreccia, E. (1994) Manuale di Bioetica. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero. p. 171–180.
Self-aware organisms deserve full moral consideration because they:
- They experience pain and pleasure
- They are aware of their own existence and context
- They prefer to experience a pleasurable life
- They prefer to stay alive
Small babies, people in comas and people with certain types of brain defects do not exhibit these characteristics. For utilitarians, these "marginal" human beings deserve less moral consideration than other human beings, and even than some nonhuman animals.
- Every person is obliged to self-fulfilment by participating in the realisation of the good of his fellow human beings and, since human life is a personal and also a social good, each person must commit himself to protect life as a patrimony of society and not only of each personal individual.
- Likewise, subsidiarity is a principle that complements the previous one by saying that society has the double obligation to assist or help more where the needs are more serious and urgent, without supplanting or substituting the free initiatives of citizens, either individually or in association. This principle implies the practice of solidarity.
- The human body is a unitary whole made up of distinct parts, organically and hierarchically unified with each other by a single, personal existence.
- It is permissible to intervene on a part of the body when there is no other way to heal or save the whole body.
- The following conditions are required: 1st) that the intervention is carried out on the diseased part, 2nd) that there are no alternative means of treatment, 3rd) that the chances of therapeutic success are good, 4th) that there is the informed consent of the person or his legitimate representative.
Introduction to Global Bioethics
Lilian Santos
Created on December 20, 2023
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Math Lesson Plan
View
Primary Unit Plan 2
View
Animated Chalkboard Learning Unit
View
Business Learning Unit
View
Corporate Signature Learning Unit
View
Code Training Unit
View
History Unit plan
Explore all templates
Transcript
Bioethics
Ethics ≠ Legality: laws should always protect human goods and coincide with the contents of ethics. However, unethical practices were allowed by law in the past (e.g. slavery) and today. Some actions might be legal, but not ethical.
Ethics ≠ Technical Possibility: not everything technically possible, is ethically good and convenient for the human being and the planet (e.g. nuclear weapons).
Lílian Santos
lilian.santos@upra.org
Introduction to Global Bioethics
1927
Fritz Jahr "Bioethik"
1960s
Medical advances
1969
Daniel John CallahanHastings Center
1971
Potter “Bioethics: brigde to the future”
Hellegers Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University
1978
IVF
1979
Tom Beauchamp - James Childress "Principles of Biomedical Ethics"
1988
Potter "Global Bioethics"
2003
Human Genome Project
2005
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
2010-
NBIC Technologies
GAP 90/10
Exclusive: World’s first baby born with new “3 parent” technique
Info
Nebraska grandmother acts as surrogate for gay son
Google Baby
Homem trans engravida para realizar sonho do casal de ter filho
Info
Info
Info
Twins born from embryos frozen 30 years ago
I can't let go of my remaining embryos
Brasil: Vale vai pagar 7 mil milhões de dólares pela tragédia de Brumadinho em 2019
Info
Info
Migrantes climáticos
Info
Sequías y bioética
CRISPR-Cas9
Emmanuelle Charpentier - Jennifer Doudna 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
He Jiankui and the first CRISPR babies
Japan approves first human-animal embryo experiments
Info
Scientists grow whole model of human embryo, without sperm or egg
Info
The Internet of Bodies Will Change Everything, for Better or Worse
Info
Biohackers, cyborgs, DIYbio
Transhumanism: Meet the cyborgs and biohackers redefining beauty
Info
Biohacking and Transhumanism
Article
What?DIYbio
Conclusion
Why? H+
Is it right?Bioethics and Governance
DIY strongly exemplifies transhumanist behaviour (cf. Natasha Vita-More, 2019).
Models and Method
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
01
Actions are good insofar as they promote pleasure and avoid pain.
in Bioethics
02
Good: more pleasure, less pain for as many people as possible.
Consequences
03
When a being is not capable of suffering and enjoyment, there is nothing to take into account.
Principalism
step 1
Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in
JUSTICE
AUTONOMY
BENEFICENCE
NON MALEFICENCE
+info
Personalism
04
03
02
01
Freedom and Responsability
Sociability and Subsidiarity
Totality and Therapy
Defence of physical life
Principlism vs Personalism
Principlist stance:
Personalist stance:
García, J. J. (2012). Bioética Personalista y Bioética Principialista. Perspectivas [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://www.bioeticaweb.com/bioactica-personalista-y-bioactica-principialista-perspectivas/
Quintana, C. (2011). Sgreccia: una bioética católica [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://www.bioeticadesdeasturias.com/2011/12/esgreccia-una-bioetica-catolica.html
Triangular Method
Global Bioethics (global in scope and content)
Anthropological-valuative reading
Bioethical situation-question
Ethical and normative elaboration
Scientific fact
Principles of Personalist Bioethics
- Defence of physical life: one cannot exist, be free, have human rights without life;
- Freedom and responsibility: achieving individual and collective good.
- Totality and therapy: the organism is organically unified. It is permissible to intervene on one part in order to save the whole organism;
- Sociability and subsidiarity: life is a social good, not just an individual one. Society must help without substituting individual initiatives. It implies solidarity;
Cf. Sgreccia, E. (1994) Manuale di Bioetica. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero. p. 171–180.FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONALIST PHILOSOPHY
Burgos, J. (2011). Filosofía personalista como fundamento de la Bioética personalista [BLOG]. Recuperado el día 10, Febrero, 2017 en http://enciclopediadebioetica.com/index.php/todas-las-voces/189-la-filosofia-personalista-como-fundamento-de-la-bioetica-personalista
Principles of Personalist Bioethics
- Defence of physical life: one cannot exist, be free, have human rights without life;
- Freedom and responsibility: achieving individual and collective good.
- Totality and therapy: the organism is organically unified. It is permissible to intervene on one part in order to save the whole organism;
- Sociability and subsidiarity: life is a social good, not just an individual one. Society must help without substituting individual initiatives. It implies solidarity;
Cf. Sgreccia, E. (1994) Manuale di Bioetica. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero. p. 171–180.Self-aware organisms deserve full moral consideration because they:
Small babies, people in comas and people with certain types of brain defects do not exhibit these characteristics. For utilitarians, these "marginal" human beings deserve less moral consideration than other human beings, and even than some nonhuman animals.