Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!
Logic, Premises, and Values
LMS Support Group
Created on October 6, 2023
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Visual Presentation
View
Terrazzo Presentation
View
Colorful Presentation
View
Modular Structure Presentation
View
Chromatic Presentation
View
City Presentation
View
News Presentation
Transcript
wow
Logic in Everyday Life
how challenging premises also challenges values
wow
Basic Presentation
I’m an awesome subtitle, ideal for giving more context about the topic at hand
go!
An example of logic in contemporary life
Andrew Bailey, MO Attorney General, on trans care for teens: Bailey said he “wanted all patients to have access to the information necessary to make health decisions that can have long-term deleterious health consequences....But at the end of the day that started with protecting children,” which means “treating these other mental health problems before we raced down the road of administration of experimental drugs.”
P1: Children should not be allowed to make medical decisions that could harm them. P2: Care for teens who want to transition-- puberty blockers, hormone therapy and gender-reassignment surgery-- are experimental and untested.C: The State of Missouri should regulate trans medical care for people under 18 (and also people over 18)
Digging deeper into premises
P1: Children should not be allowed to make medical decisions that could harm them. Are children making medical decisions now? Who should be allowed to make medical decisions for them?P2: Care for teens who want to transition-- puberty blockers, hormone therapy and gender-reassignment surgery-- are experimental and untested.What does experimental mean, given that these practices have been used and studied for more than 15 years? How much more study would be enough?C: The State of Missouri should regulate trans medical care for people under 18 (and also people over 18)
If we disagree with this premises, what do we do with his conclusion?