COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
1. Introduction
2. Key Terms
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
6. Collective Actions for Positive Changes
3. Key Actors
4. Key Conflicts
5. Measures in Place
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
8. Research
7. Key questions
Lack of trust in the EU
The lack of trust in the EU primarily arises from concerns about losing national control, limited influence in decision-making, and disagreements over policies. This scepticism, known as has gained momentum due to perceived breaches on countries' ability to make their own choices, notably in areas like immigration and economic regulations. Recent efforts to address this involve , and , with the help of expert groups like the However, ongoing challenges such as and between Member States continue to strain EU cohesion. Additionally, while countries show solidarity based on mutual exchange, there's little unity among citizens and between EU institutions and citizens. This lack of cross-border unity could harm Europe's social cohesion and long-term integration.
lack of transparency
Euroscepticism
promoting greater transparency,
reinforcing the participation of national parliaments in EU matters,
strengthening citizens’ participation
simplifying the decision-making process
Fit for Future Platform.
economic disparities
Brexit
Solidarity vs. national interests
is a key principle among EU Member States that collaborate and offer mutual assistance to accomplish shared objectives. It underlines the . On the other hand, encompass the distinct priorities of individual Member States, which may differ and cause governments to lose their power. In fact, when the national interests of different EU countries strongly clash, it can cause a in the decision-making process. This makes it difficult for individual governments to promote their own agendas and shape EU policies according to their interests. As a result, governments may struggle to influence EU-level decisions, and risk losing if people feel their interests are not well-represented, which can lead to . Furthermore, people who are not satisfied with their representation express their concerns through demonstrations, a collective form of protest which on the one hand can make a difference, especially in situations However, these events sometimes end up in violent riots, such as the , with authorities starting them sometimes as well, like . Not only that, but this can also lead to legal consequences, like civil liability, prohibition orders, criminal records, etc
Solidarity
importance of unity and co-action for the benefit of the entire EU
national interests
dilemma
public trust
low voter turnout
when public opinion is not being heard by those in power.
Yellow Vests
the current France riots
Measures in Place
● Introduced in 2012 as part of the Lisbon Treaty, it is an important instrument through which an individual can , which the European Commission has to add to its agenda in case it is supported by at least 1 million citizens from 7 Member States. ● The EU is promoting digital education in all aspects, with programmes like the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). Their aim is to strengthen digital participation, using technology in order to get more people involved. The EU , public consultations, and . Thus, EU citizens can directly interact with policymakers and have their say in decision-making. ● A platform implemented by the European Commission, which allows citizens and businesses to share their thoughts on new and existing laws and policies. There are various initiatives, with topics ranging from to . Moreover, people can add their own feedback on initiatives, and can dismiss them due to lack of evidence.
European Citizens' Initiative (ECI):
propose a motion
Digital Education Action Plan:
e-petitions
wants to make it easier for citizens to participate through online platforms
Have your say:
EU visa policy revision
mechanisms
criminalisation of money laundering
Key Terms
● - A democratic governance approach promoting active and direct involvement of citizens in decision-making and policy processes. Citizens are encouraged to engage in political discussions and have a say through citizen involvement, open dialogue, etc. A key element to this governance approach is the , which helps shape the future of Europe, thanks to bodies like the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy. ● - A governmental system where citizens elect representatives to propose and vote on legislation or policy initiatives on their behalf. This is an example of ● - Another key principle among EU Member States whereby they collaborate and offer mutual assistance to accomplish common goals. It underlines the importance of unity and co-action for the benefit of the entire EU. ● - A way for citizens to have a say in the decision-making processes that affect their lives. City governments, organised by the , being the nearest governing bodies to individuals, serve as the initial hub for democracy to take root and facilitate links between citizens and politics. ● - A sceptical view of the European Union, questioning its influence on national sovereignty, decision-making, and policies, leading to doubts and criticism about its role and effectiveness.
Participatory democracy
citizen education,
decentralised decision-making,
principle of democratic participation,
Representative democracy
indirect democracy.
EU Solidarity
Direct Citizen Engagement
Council of European Municipalities and Regions
Euroscepticism
Links for further research
More about the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy by
the Eurada (2021) An article documenting the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy,
and the ways you can take part in it.
How the EU laws are shaped by citizens’ views by the European Commission
A quick video on how the ideas citizens share can help modify the laws of the EU.
Young people’s participation in European democratic processes by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (2023) A document which dives into how the youth gets involved in public decision-making, and the measures they take.
Europe lacks a functioning infrastructure for its citizens’ political participation by Bertelsmann Stiftung (2022) A study focused on developing a better participation framework within the EU, examining the different mechanisms used in decision-making.
Europe lacks a functioning infrastructure for its citizens’ political participation by Bertelsmann Stiftung (2022) A study focused on developing a better participation framework within the EU, examining the different mechanisms used in decision-making.
Exploring Worldwide Democratic Innovations: Inspiring new forms of democratic by the European Partnership for Democracy (EPD) An international research project investigating innovative models of deliberative and participatory democracy across different countries, with a strong focus on the platform “The Hub”, which offers tools to create community among citizens
European Parliament's Role & Right of Legislative initiative
The , with for other bodies. The European Parliament and Council can ask the Commission to propose laws, although the Commission isn't obliged to. If it refuses, it must give reasons. There's , potential legal actions, and its increasing involvement in EU planning. The Commission's President pledged to work closely with Parliament, offering legislative proposals on its request. This should respect key principles such as and The European Parliament's unique role in representing the interests of Member States and ensuring legislative coherence should be upheld. With more right of legislative initiative, and by , the EU can create a more inclusive decision-making process while safeguarding the role and authority of its established institutions.
limited initiative rights
European Commission has a strong grip on proposing EU laws
debate over Parliament's role
subsidiarity.
proportionality
strategically integrating citizen input
Measures in Place
A new series of programmes launched in the first half of 2023 by the EU to promote political participation and awareness among the new generations, who compose . These programmes are primarily executed through the , an inclusive platform to take meaningful action on youth political and civic engagement through resources, expertise, research, activities and achievements. ● Introduced as a successful outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, it has recently been added as another feature of democratic life in the EU. These panels generated the , which contains recommendations from the Panel, published alongside the Commission's forthcoming proposals. The proposal addresses citizens' concerns by offering actions like the empowering citizens online and enhancing digital involvement. ● A program that backs efforts aimed at reinforcing the memory of contemporary European history and promoting greater civic engagement within the EU. The proccess and implementation of this program is discussed in the , which can be joined by anyone. While this is one of the dialogue groups, there are that discuss a range of topics related to the EU
Summit of democracy:
the least participative group by age
Youth Democracy Cohort
European Citizens’ Panels:
Citizens' Report
Citizen Toolbox
Europe for Citizens:
Civil dialogue group
several others
Key Questions
Despite the measures in place, citizen involvement in public decision-making might still be somehow conflictive because there are still some further unanswered questions, which we can link to similar topics and debates in the EU, such as: ● How can we strike a balance between the clashing concepts of solidarity and national interest when it comes to citizens’ involvement in decision-making? ● Keeping in mind that demonstrations are a way for citizens to voice their opinion, how can the EU ensure that these protests are respected by Member States and are carried out safely? ● Considering that a lack of cross-border unity could harm European social cohesion and integration, how can the EU facilitate a greater degree of unity between its citizens and EU institutions? ● How can the EU leverage digital technologies to foster citizen engagement while addressing potential challenges related to digital divides and ensuring data security and privacy? ● How can the EU effectively incorporate the perspectives of citizens to ensure both their input and integration into policymaking processes, leading to concrete actions and policy changes that reflect citizens' needs?
The main objective of the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative
Democracy is to address the growing need within EU institutions and Member States
for in facilitating participatory and deliberative projects and
policies at the EU level. Furthermore, it provides guidance to researchers and
policymakers, helps them improve their skills, creates special places for citizens to
get involved, and tests out new methods for better engagement.
enhanced capabilities
Direct Citizen Engagement vs. Representative Democracy
This conflict can be managed by striking a balance between involving citizens directly, upholding representative democracy principles, and preventing conflicts with elected representatives. Direct citizen engagement encompasses citizens in decision-making through methods like and , empowering them and fostering a sense of ownership. On the other hand, the EU's representative democracy relies on elected representatives to make efficient decisions. , capture public opinions, and ensure the EU remains responsive to its diverse population.
directly including
public consultations
Finding this balance is a way to uphold democratic values
Collective Actions for Positive Changes
is a concept proposed by the MS to bring together randomly selected citizens to discuss local and European issues. These assemblies a direct link between citizens and policymakers, fostering open dialogue and collaboration. It is important to mention that this idea . – The Council of Europe organised an where a methodology for organising a Citizens’ Assembly was presented and discussed challenges and opportunities of such a model. This further contributes to the need for collective action to raise citizen awareness, especially among so that the next generations keep advocating for involvement. There are programmes like the which engage people in social, economic and environmental developments. Whether it is at an international, national, or , civic participation is in our democracy, and an innovative method of involvement is , with . Furthermore, their aim at delivering public services to people more efficiently, and it allows citizens, enterprises and organisations easier interaction with the government. An effective way to enhance citizen participation at a local level is through the , an annual event where local authorities and organisations from the 46 member states of the Council of Europe arrange public activities to connect with their residents regarding local matters. Nevertheless, some keep persisting, such as people with a old or disabled people who struggle to use it, that come along with it, etc.
Regional Citizen Assemblies
create
has not been fully implemented yet
online event
younger people
EU DEAR Programme
essentional
local level
eGovernment and digital public services
action plans
digital participation
European Local Democracy Week
lack of access to technology,
barriers
dangers
Relevance and explanation of the problem
While most European citizens want to have a bigger say in EU decision making, there is a 22% of them who find the EU too complex and would rather have only experts and politicians taking part in this process. Moreover, the is reflected by 65% of citizens who feel optimistic regarding the future of the EU. This slightly increased, for the first time since 2009, the positive image of the EU, now standing at 47%,with 36% of neutral views and 16% negative views. Additionally, 49% of Europeans tendto trust the EU and 34% tend to trust their national government. Nevertheless, and the that question the entire idea behind the EU are issues which compromise the trust in the EU.
European citizens have had their say on the future of Europe, as a result of a citizen-led series of debates and deliberations that took place during the Conference on the Future of Europe. The (ECIs) also served as a way for people to propose their ideas to shape the future together. However, these instruments The principle of democratic participation providing every individual a platform to share their ideas and be democratically supported by the rest of European citizens. Whether it is a motion to , or
European Citizens’ Initiatives
general perception of the EU
are now winding down
advocates for
to stop animal-tested products
Euroscepticism
to connect all European capitals through a high-speed train network
increasing support for extremist right wing parties
, without bodies like the Conference on the
Future of Europe, there is no feasible way to do so. The impending closure of these
systems contradicts the principles of democratic participation., making it harder to maintain
active participation and collective decision-making.
All for one, one for all
by Luismi Ossorio Gil (ES/DE)
All for one, One for all: With the Conference on the Future of Europe and the European Citizens Initiatives coming to an end, Europeans are no longer able to present their ideas to the EP and the policymakers of Europe. How can the EU facilitate the need for people to discuss and resolve their problems directly with them while not diverting the power of the EP and keeping true to its value of solidarity?
The EU Institutional Triangle, composed by the , the
and the , contributes significantly to the legislative and decision-making processes within the EU. The EC stands for the collective interests of the EU, which are later voted on by the Council and the EP. Some of the legislative proposals aim at citizens' involvement, focusing on
strengthening Europe's democratic values, and promoting political participation among the youth.
European Commission (EC)
European Parliament (EP)
Council of the EU
European Citizen Action Service (ECAS): A non-profit organisation based in Brussels with an international presence and over 30 years of expertise. Their primary goal is to and foster a more inclusive and resilient European Union through various means, such as advocating for citizens' rights and establishing mechanisms that enhance democratic participation and engagement between citizens and the EU. One such mechanism is the platform , where they can organise an initiative online.
empower citizens
European Citizens’ Initiative Forum
AFCO
Anastasiia Strukova
Created on August 18, 2023
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Interactive Hangman
View
Secret Code
View
Branching Scenario: Academic Ethics and AI Use
View
The Fortune Ball
View
Repeat the Sequence Game
View
Pixel Challenge
View
Word Search: Corporate Culture
Explore all templates
Transcript
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
1. Introduction
2. Key Terms
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
6. Collective Actions for Positive Changes
3. Key Actors
4. Key Conflicts
5. Measures in Place
COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (AFCO)
8. Research
7. Key questions
Lack of trust in the EU
The lack of trust in the EU primarily arises from concerns about losing national control, limited influence in decision-making, and disagreements over policies. This scepticism, known as has gained momentum due to perceived breaches on countries' ability to make their own choices, notably in areas like immigration and economic regulations. Recent efforts to address this involve , and , with the help of expert groups like the However, ongoing challenges such as and between Member States continue to strain EU cohesion. Additionally, while countries show solidarity based on mutual exchange, there's little unity among citizens and between EU institutions and citizens. This lack of cross-border unity could harm Europe's social cohesion and long-term integration.
lack of transparency
Euroscepticism
promoting greater transparency,
reinforcing the participation of national parliaments in EU matters,
strengthening citizens’ participation
simplifying the decision-making process
Fit for Future Platform.
economic disparities
Brexit
Solidarity vs. national interests
is a key principle among EU Member States that collaborate and offer mutual assistance to accomplish shared objectives. It underlines the . On the other hand, encompass the distinct priorities of individual Member States, which may differ and cause governments to lose their power. In fact, when the national interests of different EU countries strongly clash, it can cause a in the decision-making process. This makes it difficult for individual governments to promote their own agendas and shape EU policies according to their interests. As a result, governments may struggle to influence EU-level decisions, and risk losing if people feel their interests are not well-represented, which can lead to . Furthermore, people who are not satisfied with their representation express their concerns through demonstrations, a collective form of protest which on the one hand can make a difference, especially in situations However, these events sometimes end up in violent riots, such as the , with authorities starting them sometimes as well, like . Not only that, but this can also lead to legal consequences, like civil liability, prohibition orders, criminal records, etc
Solidarity
importance of unity and co-action for the benefit of the entire EU
national interests
dilemma
public trust
low voter turnout
when public opinion is not being heard by those in power.
Yellow Vests
the current France riots
Measures in Place
● Introduced in 2012 as part of the Lisbon Treaty, it is an important instrument through which an individual can , which the European Commission has to add to its agenda in case it is supported by at least 1 million citizens from 7 Member States. ● The EU is promoting digital education in all aspects, with programmes like the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). Their aim is to strengthen digital participation, using technology in order to get more people involved. The EU , public consultations, and . Thus, EU citizens can directly interact with policymakers and have their say in decision-making. ● A platform implemented by the European Commission, which allows citizens and businesses to share their thoughts on new and existing laws and policies. There are various initiatives, with topics ranging from to . Moreover, people can add their own feedback on initiatives, and can dismiss them due to lack of evidence.
European Citizens' Initiative (ECI):
propose a motion
Digital Education Action Plan:
e-petitions
wants to make it easier for citizens to participate through online platforms
Have your say:
EU visa policy revision
mechanisms
criminalisation of money laundering
Key Terms
● - A democratic governance approach promoting active and direct involvement of citizens in decision-making and policy processes. Citizens are encouraged to engage in political discussions and have a say through citizen involvement, open dialogue, etc. A key element to this governance approach is the , which helps shape the future of Europe, thanks to bodies like the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy. ● - A governmental system where citizens elect representatives to propose and vote on legislation or policy initiatives on their behalf. This is an example of ● - Another key principle among EU Member States whereby they collaborate and offer mutual assistance to accomplish common goals. It underlines the importance of unity and co-action for the benefit of the entire EU. ● - A way for citizens to have a say in the decision-making processes that affect their lives. City governments, organised by the , being the nearest governing bodies to individuals, serve as the initial hub for democracy to take root and facilitate links between citizens and politics. ● - A sceptical view of the European Union, questioning its influence on national sovereignty, decision-making, and policies, leading to doubts and criticism about its role and effectiveness.
Participatory democracy
citizen education,
decentralised decision-making,
principle of democratic participation,
Representative democracy
indirect democracy.
EU Solidarity
Direct Citizen Engagement
Council of European Municipalities and Regions
Euroscepticism
Links for further research
More about the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy by the Eurada (2021) An article documenting the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy, and the ways you can take part in it.
How the EU laws are shaped by citizens’ views by the European Commission A quick video on how the ideas citizens share can help modify the laws of the EU.
Young people’s participation in European democratic processes by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (2023) A document which dives into how the youth gets involved in public decision-making, and the measures they take.
Europe lacks a functioning infrastructure for its citizens’ political participation by Bertelsmann Stiftung (2022) A study focused on developing a better participation framework within the EU, examining the different mechanisms used in decision-making.
Europe lacks a functioning infrastructure for its citizens’ political participation by Bertelsmann Stiftung (2022) A study focused on developing a better participation framework within the EU, examining the different mechanisms used in decision-making.
Exploring Worldwide Democratic Innovations: Inspiring new forms of democratic by the European Partnership for Democracy (EPD) An international research project investigating innovative models of deliberative and participatory democracy across different countries, with a strong focus on the platform “The Hub”, which offers tools to create community among citizens
European Parliament's Role & Right of Legislative initiative
The , with for other bodies. The European Parliament and Council can ask the Commission to propose laws, although the Commission isn't obliged to. If it refuses, it must give reasons. There's , potential legal actions, and its increasing involvement in EU planning. The Commission's President pledged to work closely with Parliament, offering legislative proposals on its request. This should respect key principles such as and The European Parliament's unique role in representing the interests of Member States and ensuring legislative coherence should be upheld. With more right of legislative initiative, and by , the EU can create a more inclusive decision-making process while safeguarding the role and authority of its established institutions.
limited initiative rights
European Commission has a strong grip on proposing EU laws
debate over Parliament's role
subsidiarity.
proportionality
strategically integrating citizen input
Measures in Place
A new series of programmes launched in the first half of 2023 by the EU to promote political participation and awareness among the new generations, who compose . These programmes are primarily executed through the , an inclusive platform to take meaningful action on youth political and civic engagement through resources, expertise, research, activities and achievements. ● Introduced as a successful outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, it has recently been added as another feature of democratic life in the EU. These panels generated the , which contains recommendations from the Panel, published alongside the Commission's forthcoming proposals. The proposal addresses citizens' concerns by offering actions like the empowering citizens online and enhancing digital involvement. ● A program that backs efforts aimed at reinforcing the memory of contemporary European history and promoting greater civic engagement within the EU. The proccess and implementation of this program is discussed in the , which can be joined by anyone. While this is one of the dialogue groups, there are that discuss a range of topics related to the EU
Summit of democracy:
the least participative group by age
Youth Democracy Cohort
European Citizens’ Panels:
Citizens' Report
Citizen Toolbox
Europe for Citizens:
Civil dialogue group
several others
Key Questions
Despite the measures in place, citizen involvement in public decision-making might still be somehow conflictive because there are still some further unanswered questions, which we can link to similar topics and debates in the EU, such as: ● How can we strike a balance between the clashing concepts of solidarity and national interest when it comes to citizens’ involvement in decision-making? ● Keeping in mind that demonstrations are a way for citizens to voice their opinion, how can the EU ensure that these protests are respected by Member States and are carried out safely? ● Considering that a lack of cross-border unity could harm European social cohesion and integration, how can the EU facilitate a greater degree of unity between its citizens and EU institutions? ● How can the EU leverage digital technologies to foster citizen engagement while addressing potential challenges related to digital divides and ensuring data security and privacy? ● How can the EU effectively incorporate the perspectives of citizens to ensure both their input and integration into policymaking processes, leading to concrete actions and policy changes that reflect citizens' needs?
The main objective of the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy is to address the growing need within EU institutions and Member States for in facilitating participatory and deliberative projects and policies at the EU level. Furthermore, it provides guidance to researchers and policymakers, helps them improve their skills, creates special places for citizens to get involved, and tests out new methods for better engagement.
enhanced capabilities
Direct Citizen Engagement vs. Representative Democracy
This conflict can be managed by striking a balance between involving citizens directly, upholding representative democracy principles, and preventing conflicts with elected representatives. Direct citizen engagement encompasses citizens in decision-making through methods like and , empowering them and fostering a sense of ownership. On the other hand, the EU's representative democracy relies on elected representatives to make efficient decisions. , capture public opinions, and ensure the EU remains responsive to its diverse population.
directly including
public consultations
Finding this balance is a way to uphold democratic values
Collective Actions for Positive Changes
is a concept proposed by the MS to bring together randomly selected citizens to discuss local and European issues. These assemblies a direct link between citizens and policymakers, fostering open dialogue and collaboration. It is important to mention that this idea . – The Council of Europe organised an where a methodology for organising a Citizens’ Assembly was presented and discussed challenges and opportunities of such a model. This further contributes to the need for collective action to raise citizen awareness, especially among so that the next generations keep advocating for involvement. There are programmes like the which engage people in social, economic and environmental developments. Whether it is at an international, national, or , civic participation is in our democracy, and an innovative method of involvement is , with . Furthermore, their aim at delivering public services to people more efficiently, and it allows citizens, enterprises and organisations easier interaction with the government. An effective way to enhance citizen participation at a local level is through the , an annual event where local authorities and organisations from the 46 member states of the Council of Europe arrange public activities to connect with their residents regarding local matters. Nevertheless, some keep persisting, such as people with a old or disabled people who struggle to use it, that come along with it, etc.
Regional Citizen Assemblies
create
has not been fully implemented yet
online event
younger people
EU DEAR Programme
essentional
local level
eGovernment and digital public services
action plans
digital participation
European Local Democracy Week
lack of access to technology,
barriers
dangers
Relevance and explanation of the problem
While most European citizens want to have a bigger say in EU decision making, there is a 22% of them who find the EU too complex and would rather have only experts and politicians taking part in this process. Moreover, the is reflected by 65% of citizens who feel optimistic regarding the future of the EU. This slightly increased, for the first time since 2009, the positive image of the EU, now standing at 47%,with 36% of neutral views and 16% negative views. Additionally, 49% of Europeans tendto trust the EU and 34% tend to trust their national government. Nevertheless, and the that question the entire idea behind the EU are issues which compromise the trust in the EU.
European citizens have had their say on the future of Europe, as a result of a citizen-led series of debates and deliberations that took place during the Conference on the Future of Europe. The (ECIs) also served as a way for people to propose their ideas to shape the future together. However, these instruments The principle of democratic participation providing every individual a platform to share their ideas and be democratically supported by the rest of European citizens. Whether it is a motion to , or
European Citizens’ Initiatives
general perception of the EU
are now winding down
advocates for
to stop animal-tested products
Euroscepticism
to connect all European capitals through a high-speed train network
increasing support for extremist right wing parties
, without bodies like the Conference on the Future of Europe, there is no feasible way to do so. The impending closure of these systems contradicts the principles of democratic participation., making it harder to maintain active participation and collective decision-making.
All for one, one for all
by Luismi Ossorio Gil (ES/DE)
All for one, One for all: With the Conference on the Future of Europe and the European Citizens Initiatives coming to an end, Europeans are no longer able to present their ideas to the EP and the policymakers of Europe. How can the EU facilitate the need for people to discuss and resolve their problems directly with them while not diverting the power of the EP and keeping true to its value of solidarity?
The EU Institutional Triangle, composed by the , the and the , contributes significantly to the legislative and decision-making processes within the EU. The EC stands for the collective interests of the EU, which are later voted on by the Council and the EP. Some of the legislative proposals aim at citizens' involvement, focusing on strengthening Europe's democratic values, and promoting political participation among the youth.
European Commission (EC)
European Parliament (EP)
Council of the EU
European Citizen Action Service (ECAS): A non-profit organisation based in Brussels with an international presence and over 30 years of expertise. Their primary goal is to and foster a more inclusive and resilient European Union through various means, such as advocating for citizens' rights and establishing mechanisms that enhance democratic participation and engagement between citizens and the EU. One such mechanism is the platform , where they can organise an initiative online.
empower citizens
European Citizens’ Initiative Forum