Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!

Get started free

Body-Worn Cameras

Leonel De La Garza

Created on May 3, 2023

Start designing with a free template

Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:

Mobile App Dossier

Color Shapes Dossier

Notes Dossier

Futuristic Tech Dossier

Crowdfunding Campaign

Company Dossier

Economy Dossier

Explore all templates

Transcript

Shows Drop In Police Use Of Force
The Beginning

Complaints against police dropped by 17% and the use of force by police, during fatal and non-fatal encounters, fell by nearly 10%.

The first testing of body-worn cameras was in the United Kingdom in 2005. Then was later followed by the United States in 2014.

Officer's Behavior

Body-Worn Cameras

Favor or Oppose

89%

36%

53%

11%

No Influence

Has Influence

Purpose

66%

Oppose

27%

Strongly Support

Somewhat Support

Support

To record enforcement, investigate, and other encounters between the police and the public.

Body-Worn Camera Cost

Pay Higher Taxes for Body Cams

Average Yearly Cost: $2,108

Usage - Small PDs

$1,164

47% of law enforcement agencies have acquired body-worn cameras.

$143

$801

Usage - Large PDs

Con 2

Pro 1

Pro 2

Pro 3

Con 1

With larger police departments, that number has increased to 80%.

Police body worn cameras improve police accountability.

Good police reform tool. Strong support from public.

Invade the privacy of citizens.

A powerful tool in domestic violence cases.

Police body camera are too expensive.