film
snowdeN
discussion
Produced by Oliver Stone
September 16 2016
“I think this is the greatest freedom that I have gained, the fact that I don't have to worry about what happens tomorrow, because I'm happy with what I've done today.”
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"It means that if there is another 9/11, it'll be your fault."
"In 20 years, Iraq will be a hellhole nobody cares about."
"Most Americans don't want freedom. They want security."
"The modern battlefield is everywhere."
“Bombs won't stop terrorism, brains will"
"Secrecy is security and security is victory"
"Sometimes the more you look the less you see."
"What's the first rule of battle? - Never reveal your position.”
"Every server, communication channel is our battlefield today."
"Cyber espionage is not the fight against terrorism. It is ....
"If you choose the wrong way, the world ....
"I watch how others live because my own life is on pause"
"You're safe as long as you don't know anything"
"You don't have to agree with your politicians to be a patriot."
"The Internet is a technology that has ....
"One man can stop the motor of the world."
"Privacy is not about something to hide. ....
“Sometimes we're restricted from telling the whole truth. ....
“Wait, so we're collecting twice as much in the U.S. as ....
"It’s just going to get worse for the next generation, as ....
"The NSA is really tracking every cell phone in the world."
"Without the information to start the public debate we are loss.
“There's something going on in the government....
“The truth sinks in that no matter....
Ed: "You’re just buying into what one side is saying. ....
"Snowden played a very important role in.....
How do you evaluate Snowden's actions?
Is he, in your opinion, a hero or an enemy? a knight or a blackguard? a fighter for justice or a traitor to his country?
questions
Where do you think the line between justice and betrayal lies?
What is the moral aspect of working for intelligence services?
How can intelligence officers justify violating the law and basic human rights?
E.Snowden has revealed classified information and has deprived many of his former colleagues of their jobs. Is it possible to criticize him?
Сan E. Snowden’s example have an impact on the minds of thousands of other intelligence officers who basically disagree with the need to break the law in the name of a good cause?
Do you think this film inspired other people to follow Snowden's path and fight for the truth?
If you were in Snowdon’s position, living in Hawaii, in paradise and making a ton of money, what would it take to make you leave everything behind?
What motivated Snowden to leak all the US critical data and breach State's secret?
If you were Snowden, would you be able to do the same?
Where is Snowden currently and why?
What was Snowden doing for 11 days in Hong Kong before he met with journalists?
What do you think about spying on citizens in order to provide safety?
Shall we agree that our privacy can be used in order to gain an advantage in cyber space? Are we ready to give up privacy in order to enchance our security?
How did Snowden's experience as a contractor for the NSA influence his decision to become a whistleblower?
When did he actually start stealing the files?
What measures can the average person take to combat cyber threats?
Did Snowden make a right decision exposing the unpleasant truth about his beloved country by using state property?
How did the exposure affect further development of world history?
The film showed the difficulties that Ed and Lindsay went through in their relationship. Do you think it is possible to build a healthy family if your position does not allow you to disclose the information about your job even to the closest person?
Do you agree with Mr O’Brian’s words: “How can we defend ourselves against nuclear war, terror attacks, cyber attacks without a centralized intel factory working around the world night and day?”
In the beginning when Snowden broke his leg in the army, the doctor said there are «plenty of other ways» to serve your country. What do you think these ways are?
Mr O'Brian said: “Most Americans don’t want freedom, they want security”. Do you think it’s applicable to Russians?
(beginning) During Mr O’Brian’s class Snowden completed the task faster than anyone, because he didn’t follow stages in order. Do you think people who do not follow the exact decrees are valued in government service?
How do you feel about the idea that you don’t have to agree with the politicians to be a patriot?
How did Snowden's revelations affect international relations and cooperation on cybersecurity?
When Snowden showed the HR site could be hacked and was criticized by his boss, his colleague said: «The culture of fear wins again». How do you understand this phrase?
Will you close the computer cameras after having watched this film?
How did the U.S. government respond to Snowden's revelations?
What is the acceptable role of government in protecting national security and ensuring the privacy of citizens?
What does this response reveal about the government's priorities and values?
How does the film portray the balance between freedom and security in today's society?
What do you think about governmental surveillance of citizens in order to provide national security?
What impact did the film have on your opinion of mass surveillance and the role of government in the digital age?
What are the ethical implications of mass surveillance?
Did it change your own views on these issues?
What were your initial impressions of Edward Snowden as depicted in the film?
Did your opinion of him change throughout the story?
In the context of current events and ongoing debates about surveillance and privacy, what lessons can be drawn from Snowden's story, as depicted in the film?
What impact do you think Snowden's leaks had on global perceptions of government surveillance and privacy rights?
commentaries
It is difficult to describe my impressions after the film by Oliver Stone, the great director who's not afraid to tackle matters of war, conspiracy and controversial American political issues. We see the story of one man who loves his country with all his heart and is willing to give his life for it. He trusted the government of his country, thinking that everything they do, all their actions are for the good of the country. Theoretically, this is how it is. But there is one thing... Almost all the actions of the CIA and other intelligence agencies are illegal, at least none of the citizens of America knew about FISA. The main question is whether we are ready to sacrifice our personal space for the sake of national security. This movie gives its audience much to consider.
After watching the movie, I concluded that the topic of total cyber-surveillance is very relevant today, because it affects absolutely every person on our planet. The film is interesting to watch because it is based on real events. The film makes you think not only about cybersecurity, but also about setting priorities in life. After watching the film, Edward Snowden's act aroused high respect, because he opposed his personal interests, the interests of the whole society, sacrificing his own well-being.
The film raises important questions about government transparency and people's privacy. It is a good reminder of the power of governments and technologies. At the same time, it demonstrates the defenselessness of an ordinary man in the face of the government.
Despite its length (more than two hours), the film captivates with its dynamic plot, strong characters and topical theme. Snowden is a powerful and timely reminder of the fragility of our privacy and the courage of those who risk everything to protect it.
I believe it was a very strong decision to make such a film, because it shows the US from a different prospective, reveals details about the State Department activities and shows the challenges that people face, and the film director successfully managed to show the whole truth. In the US Edward Snowden is believed to be a traitor and there certain reasons for that. However, from my point of view, Snowden is a very courageous man who went to the end and sacrificed everything to reach the truth and freedom, who could not stay silent seeing what was happening in his own country. It is curious to see the changes in the main character's views: at first he seems to be a devoted to his country, defending its beliefs. But everything changes when Snowden sees the US policy with his own eyes - namely that terrorism is just a cover, the main thing for the United States is total control, especially economic. For me, the film is not just a story of Edward Snowden, it is a high-quality biographical drama with elements of a political thriller. It allows us to look at a simple guy who challenged a huge state system.
«Snowden» made a mixed impression on me. On the one hand, I enjoyed the fascinating plot and strong charisma of the main character. On the other hand, complex ethical and social issues raised in the film, such as government surveillance, data privacy, the line between patriotism and personal wellbeing made me rethink my perception of these aspects. And they also have made me quite uncomfortable. Just seeing the numbers of people being spied on by the government of the United States gave me chills. Ultimately, “Snowden” is the powerful reminder of the importance of the need for transparency and accountability both in the government and in the society.
I really enjoyed this film, it allowed me to look from the inside at the US surveillance policy. I liked the way the creators showed the development of Snowden's character. Especially I liked the moment in the end when he repeated Lindsay's words that the people's being able to question the government and hold it accountable - that's the principle the US was founded on, although at the beginning of the film he didn't want to criticize the authorities. The first scene that touched me was the one that showed how Snowden and his colleagues targeted Marwan Al-Kirmani's daughter as a pressure point and intended to catch him drunk driving in order to put him in jail. To my mind, it is totally unethical. I was also surprised to learn that the scale of the US surveillance systems, which were used not only to spy on their adversaries, but also on their allies, just to have leverage and advantage over them in the negotiations. Terrorism was just an excuse for the US government, but this was all about economic and social control. Snowden admitted that the only thing you're really protecting is the supremacy of your government.The ending of the film was very inspiring, even though I'm upset that Ed and Lindsay had to break up.
I was very impressed after watching this film. I was fascinated by two main things. First of all, it’s unimaginable how one person can change the entire world. I mean this decision made by Ed Snowden, who was led by moral rules, to expose secret documents about the US surveillance and spy systems, despite the fact that he put himself in danger. The morality and humanity have won!Secondly, I have realised how relevant this issue of cyber security is. There are several episodes in this film demonstrating how vulnerable ordinary people are in the cyber space, as we can be observed by secret intelligence agencies, not even knowing it. Each of us is at risk! Our right to privacy is violated almost every day.
I really enjoyed the film. I believe that Joseph Gordon-Levitt brilliantly performed the role of a confused young man whose priorities change throughout the film - from an idealist at the beginning of the film who blindly believes in his government and the work that they (the CIA and NSA) are doing, he turns into a Liberal proclaiming the rights and freedoms of every person. And I also really liked the transition at the end of the film when the actor changes and instead of Joseph Snowden himself finishes the end of the film. The film is full of thought- provoking dialogues. They make you think about self-sacrifice, duty and consciousness. The man who could have become the first person in the NSA, refuses all this for the sake of ordinary people so that we know the whole truth about being watched. On the one hand, I agree that surveillance is necessary in order to control terrorism and prevent their attacks, but Snowden showed that in most cases all these resources are used by individual high-ranking officials for their own selfish interests.
This film shows the power of human moral principles. After becoming an employee of the intelligence service, Snowden was faced with a global surveillance system, which he unknowingly improved and refined. When he realized that the system he had created could be used to track anyone without court approval, he copied the data and provided all the information to the media. In fact, Snowden appears to be a knight of public justice, but the question arises, has he betrayed the government and citizens by his actions? This issue is the subject of discussion, someone will say that he did the right thing, someone will say that he broke the law. I don't have a clear answer to this question.
IThe film Snowden made a deep impression on me. It is a gripping and disturbing story about a man who uncovered mass surveillance by the U.S. government jeopardizing his life and freedom. Director Oliver Stone masterfully portrays the complex moral dilemma Edward Snowden faced. On the one hand, he felt a duty to his country and the oath he had taken as an employee of the CIA and NSA. On the other hand, he was concerned about the ethical implications of mass surveillance and believed that the American people had a right to know about the invasion of their privacy. This film makes you think about important issues of national security, privacy and the role of government in the digital age. Joseph Gordon-Levitt's performance as Snowden is brilliant and he manages to convey the character's redemption and internal struggle.
In my opinion, the film has successfully become a great way of bringing attention to the story of Edward Snowden in an accessible manner. However, there were some issues that stood out to me while watching the film.First of all, the pacing seems to be all over the place. The director clearly wanted to showcase all the facets of Snowden’s life that led him to his decision; however, the flashback method used in the film has the narrative “jump” from one one year to another, in no particular order. This made the pacing at times a bit confusing and hard to follow. Another issues I had with the movie was the way relationship of Snowden and Lindsay Mills was portrayed. I believe that the movie does not particularly succeed in making their relationship developed and believable. That’s why some moments that meant to be heart-wrenching weren’t as effective. If we speak about the positives, I believe that the lead actor’s performance was outstanding, especially when we see the real Snowden at the end of the movie. Joseph Gordon-Levitt truly embraced the role and managed to make the viewer with Snowden. Moreover, this film helps to humanise Snowden. It makes the audience see him just a regular person who fought for what he thought was right.
In his film, Oliver Stone raises the issue of the balance between national security and human freedoms. Using the example of the biography of Edward Snowden, although in an exaggerated form, the director focuses on illegal methods of mass surveillance in the United States of America. The film clearly demonstrates Oliver Stone's political position - the United States is a hegemonic country that monitors most countries in the world. The US government can turn off the lights in Japan or blackmail the government of Brazil. One can say that Oliver Stone alludes to the question: “Does the United States have the right to call itself a democracy infringing on the freedoms of its citizens and the entire world?”.While viewing the film, the audience constantly experiences the feeling of being watched by the so-called “big brother”. Stone managed to create a tense atmosphere and the viewer empathizes with the main character. However, the picture is quite politicized. Stone creates an image of “independent journalism”, as if opposing some “kind of evil” in the person of the American government.
It was interesting. And surprisingly I have watched this film before. I was dreaming about becoming hacker and watched plenty films on that topic. The problem is that I’m not that plodding, I don’t like to stay home, it’s hard to me to keep doing 1 thing for a long period of time. I am a chaotic person and I’m good at everything but not the best at anything.thought was right.
Snowden is a gripping film that delves into the problem of government surveillance and the role of whistleblowers.The film captures the tension between national security and individual privacy, raising important questions about the limits of government surveillance. The film's portrayal of the complexity of Edward Snowden's motives and the consequences of his actions was both thought-provoking and deeply moving.
I enjoyed the movie, as it provided a unique perspective on the surveillance policies of the United States. The film has exceptional acting, skilled direction and a thrilling narrative focused on risk, commitment and the pursuit of truth. After watching it I realized how relevant the issue of mass surveillance in today's world is, affecting everyone around the globe. What made the film particularly compelling was its basis in real events, provoking us to reflect not only on cybersecurity, but also on personal values and priorities. Edward Snowden's courageous act left a deep impression on me, as he chose to confront not only his own interests but also the interests of society at large, despite personal sacrifice. Besides, I was struck by the extent of the surveillance systems used by the US, which go beyond surveillance of adversaries to include allies, serving as a means to influence and gaining advantage in negotiations. I figured out that terrorism serves mostly as a pretext for the U.S. government, while the true motives are related to economic and social control.
Great acting, brilliant director and a thrilling story about risk, dedication and the truth.
A very well made movie that tackles important political topics and sheds light on the mass information debacle a few years back.
An excellent film adaptation of the story of a man who was not afraid to renounce his life's work for the sake of justice.
I enjoyed the film since it managed to portray the evolution of Snowden views and the reasons why he decided to leak the secrets of his own government.I think the case of Snowden should be looked into more thoroughly in the age of global cyber threats and cyber espionage. This film definitely has helped in this case.
The film masterfully navigates through Snowden's journey, from his initial patriotic aspirations to his eventual disillusionment and act of whistleblowing. The tension between his sense of duty to his country and his growing concern for civil liberties creates a compelling narrative arc that kept me engaged throughout. Overall, "Snowden" is a thought-provoking and timely film that sheds light on one of the most significant whistleblowing events in recent history. It serves as a poignant reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties in an increasingly digital world.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Cyber espionage is not the fight against terrorism. It is a struggle for economic and social control, and you protect not the citizens but the superiority of your state.”
"If you choose the wrong way, the world will not notice anything"
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"The Internet is a technology that has the power to let everyone in the world understand each other."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"One man can stop the motor of the world." (“Atlas Shrugged”, Ayn Rand)
"Privacy is not about something to hide. It's about something to protect”
“Sometimes we're restricted from telling the whole truth. Doesn't give us permission to lie”
“Wait, so we're collecting twice as much in the U.S. as we are in Russia?“
Without the information to start the public debate we are loss. The people being able to question our government and hold it accountable that is the principle the US was founded on. So, if we want to protect our national security, we should be protecting that principle.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
“The truth sinks in that no matter what justification you're selling yourself, this is not about terrorism. Terrorism is the excuse. This is about economic and social control. And the only thing you're really protecting is the supremacy of your government”
There's something going on in the government that's really wrong and I can't ignore it. I just want to get this data to the world. I feel like I'm made to do this and if I don't do it, I don't know anybody else that can. I can't turn back from this.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
It’s just going to get worse for the next generation, as they extend the capabilities of this sort of architecture of oppression
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
Ed: You’re just buying into what one side is saying.Lindsay: Maybe I am, cause my side is right.Ed: See, that’s funny, cause my side is right!
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Snowden played a very important role in educating the american people to the degree in which our civil liberties and our constitutional rights are being undermined”
SNOWDEN
Татьяна Яблокова
Created on May 1, 2023
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Higher Education Presentation
View
Psychedelic Presentation
View
Harmony Higher Education Thesis
View
Vaporwave presentation
View
Geniaflix Presentation
View
Vintage Mosaic Presentation
View
Modern Zen Presentation
Explore all templates
Transcript
film
snowdeN
discussion
Produced by Oliver Stone
September 16 2016
“I think this is the greatest freedom that I have gained, the fact that I don't have to worry about what happens tomorrow, because I'm happy with what I've done today.”
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"It means that if there is another 9/11, it'll be your fault."
"In 20 years, Iraq will be a hellhole nobody cares about."
"Most Americans don't want freedom. They want security."
"The modern battlefield is everywhere."
“Bombs won't stop terrorism, brains will"
"Secrecy is security and security is victory"
"Sometimes the more you look the less you see."
"What's the first rule of battle? - Never reveal your position.”
"Every server, communication channel is our battlefield today."
"Cyber espionage is not the fight against terrorism. It is ....
"If you choose the wrong way, the world ....
"I watch how others live because my own life is on pause"
"You're safe as long as you don't know anything"
"You don't have to agree with your politicians to be a patriot."
"The Internet is a technology that has ....
"One man can stop the motor of the world."
"Privacy is not about something to hide. ....
“Sometimes we're restricted from telling the whole truth. ....
“Wait, so we're collecting twice as much in the U.S. as ....
"It’s just going to get worse for the next generation, as ....
"The NSA is really tracking every cell phone in the world."
"Without the information to start the public debate we are loss.
“There's something going on in the government....
“The truth sinks in that no matter....
Ed: "You’re just buying into what one side is saying. ....
"Snowden played a very important role in.....
How do you evaluate Snowden's actions?
Is he, in your opinion, a hero or an enemy? a knight or a blackguard? a fighter for justice or a traitor to his country?
questions
Where do you think the line between justice and betrayal lies?
What is the moral aspect of working for intelligence services?
How can intelligence officers justify violating the law and basic human rights?
E.Snowden has revealed classified information and has deprived many of his former colleagues of their jobs. Is it possible to criticize him?
Сan E. Snowden’s example have an impact on the minds of thousands of other intelligence officers who basically disagree with the need to break the law in the name of a good cause?
Do you think this film inspired other people to follow Snowden's path and fight for the truth?
If you were in Snowdon’s position, living in Hawaii, in paradise and making a ton of money, what would it take to make you leave everything behind?
What motivated Snowden to leak all the US critical data and breach State's secret?
If you were Snowden, would you be able to do the same?
Where is Snowden currently and why?
What was Snowden doing for 11 days in Hong Kong before he met with journalists?
What do you think about spying on citizens in order to provide safety?
Shall we agree that our privacy can be used in order to gain an advantage in cyber space? Are we ready to give up privacy in order to enchance our security?
How did Snowden's experience as a contractor for the NSA influence his decision to become a whistleblower?
When did he actually start stealing the files?
What measures can the average person take to combat cyber threats?
Did Snowden make a right decision exposing the unpleasant truth about his beloved country by using state property?
How did the exposure affect further development of world history?
The film showed the difficulties that Ed and Lindsay went through in their relationship. Do you think it is possible to build a healthy family if your position does not allow you to disclose the information about your job even to the closest person?
Do you agree with Mr O’Brian’s words: “How can we defend ourselves against nuclear war, terror attacks, cyber attacks without a centralized intel factory working around the world night and day?”
In the beginning when Snowden broke his leg in the army, the doctor said there are «plenty of other ways» to serve your country. What do you think these ways are?
Mr O'Brian said: “Most Americans don’t want freedom, they want security”. Do you think it’s applicable to Russians?
(beginning) During Mr O’Brian’s class Snowden completed the task faster than anyone, because he didn’t follow stages in order. Do you think people who do not follow the exact decrees are valued in government service?
How do you feel about the idea that you don’t have to agree with the politicians to be a patriot?
How did Snowden's revelations affect international relations and cooperation on cybersecurity?
When Snowden showed the HR site could be hacked and was criticized by his boss, his colleague said: «The culture of fear wins again». How do you understand this phrase?
Will you close the computer cameras after having watched this film?
How did the U.S. government respond to Snowden's revelations?
What is the acceptable role of government in protecting national security and ensuring the privacy of citizens?
What does this response reveal about the government's priorities and values?
How does the film portray the balance between freedom and security in today's society?
What do you think about governmental surveillance of citizens in order to provide national security?
What impact did the film have on your opinion of mass surveillance and the role of government in the digital age?
What are the ethical implications of mass surveillance?
Did it change your own views on these issues?
What were your initial impressions of Edward Snowden as depicted in the film?
Did your opinion of him change throughout the story?
In the context of current events and ongoing debates about surveillance and privacy, what lessons can be drawn from Snowden's story, as depicted in the film?
What impact do you think Snowden's leaks had on global perceptions of government surveillance and privacy rights?
commentaries
It is difficult to describe my impressions after the film by Oliver Stone, the great director who's not afraid to tackle matters of war, conspiracy and controversial American political issues. We see the story of one man who loves his country with all his heart and is willing to give his life for it. He trusted the government of his country, thinking that everything they do, all their actions are for the good of the country. Theoretically, this is how it is. But there is one thing... Almost all the actions of the CIA and other intelligence agencies are illegal, at least none of the citizens of America knew about FISA. The main question is whether we are ready to sacrifice our personal space for the sake of national security. This movie gives its audience much to consider.
After watching the movie, I concluded that the topic of total cyber-surveillance is very relevant today, because it affects absolutely every person on our planet. The film is interesting to watch because it is based on real events. The film makes you think not only about cybersecurity, but also about setting priorities in life. After watching the film, Edward Snowden's act aroused high respect, because he opposed his personal interests, the interests of the whole society, sacrificing his own well-being.
The film raises important questions about government transparency and people's privacy. It is a good reminder of the power of governments and technologies. At the same time, it demonstrates the defenselessness of an ordinary man in the face of the government.
Despite its length (more than two hours), the film captivates with its dynamic plot, strong characters and topical theme. Snowden is a powerful and timely reminder of the fragility of our privacy and the courage of those who risk everything to protect it.
I believe it was a very strong decision to make such a film, because it shows the US from a different prospective, reveals details about the State Department activities and shows the challenges that people face, and the film director successfully managed to show the whole truth. In the US Edward Snowden is believed to be a traitor and there certain reasons for that. However, from my point of view, Snowden is a very courageous man who went to the end and sacrificed everything to reach the truth and freedom, who could not stay silent seeing what was happening in his own country. It is curious to see the changes in the main character's views: at first he seems to be a devoted to his country, defending its beliefs. But everything changes when Snowden sees the US policy with his own eyes - namely that terrorism is just a cover, the main thing for the United States is total control, especially economic. For me, the film is not just a story of Edward Snowden, it is a high-quality biographical drama with elements of a political thriller. It allows us to look at a simple guy who challenged a huge state system.
«Snowden» made a mixed impression on me. On the one hand, I enjoyed the fascinating plot and strong charisma of the main character. On the other hand, complex ethical and social issues raised in the film, such as government surveillance, data privacy, the line between patriotism and personal wellbeing made me rethink my perception of these aspects. And they also have made me quite uncomfortable. Just seeing the numbers of people being spied on by the government of the United States gave me chills. Ultimately, “Snowden” is the powerful reminder of the importance of the need for transparency and accountability both in the government and in the society.
I really enjoyed this film, it allowed me to look from the inside at the US surveillance policy. I liked the way the creators showed the development of Snowden's character. Especially I liked the moment in the end when he repeated Lindsay's words that the people's being able to question the government and hold it accountable - that's the principle the US was founded on, although at the beginning of the film he didn't want to criticize the authorities. The first scene that touched me was the one that showed how Snowden and his colleagues targeted Marwan Al-Kirmani's daughter as a pressure point and intended to catch him drunk driving in order to put him in jail. To my mind, it is totally unethical. I was also surprised to learn that the scale of the US surveillance systems, which were used not only to spy on their adversaries, but also on their allies, just to have leverage and advantage over them in the negotiations. Terrorism was just an excuse for the US government, but this was all about economic and social control. Snowden admitted that the only thing you're really protecting is the supremacy of your government.The ending of the film was very inspiring, even though I'm upset that Ed and Lindsay had to break up.
I was very impressed after watching this film. I was fascinated by two main things. First of all, it’s unimaginable how one person can change the entire world. I mean this decision made by Ed Snowden, who was led by moral rules, to expose secret documents about the US surveillance and spy systems, despite the fact that he put himself in danger. The morality and humanity have won!Secondly, I have realised how relevant this issue of cyber security is. There are several episodes in this film demonstrating how vulnerable ordinary people are in the cyber space, as we can be observed by secret intelligence agencies, not even knowing it. Each of us is at risk! Our right to privacy is violated almost every day.
I really enjoyed the film. I believe that Joseph Gordon-Levitt brilliantly performed the role of a confused young man whose priorities change throughout the film - from an idealist at the beginning of the film who blindly believes in his government and the work that they (the CIA and NSA) are doing, he turns into a Liberal proclaiming the rights and freedoms of every person. And I also really liked the transition at the end of the film when the actor changes and instead of Joseph Snowden himself finishes the end of the film. The film is full of thought- provoking dialogues. They make you think about self-sacrifice, duty and consciousness. The man who could have become the first person in the NSA, refuses all this for the sake of ordinary people so that we know the whole truth about being watched. On the one hand, I agree that surveillance is necessary in order to control terrorism and prevent their attacks, but Snowden showed that in most cases all these resources are used by individual high-ranking officials for their own selfish interests.
This film shows the power of human moral principles. After becoming an employee of the intelligence service, Snowden was faced with a global surveillance system, which he unknowingly improved and refined. When he realized that the system he had created could be used to track anyone without court approval, he copied the data and provided all the information to the media. In fact, Snowden appears to be a knight of public justice, but the question arises, has he betrayed the government and citizens by his actions? This issue is the subject of discussion, someone will say that he did the right thing, someone will say that he broke the law. I don't have a clear answer to this question.
IThe film Snowden made a deep impression on me. It is a gripping and disturbing story about a man who uncovered mass surveillance by the U.S. government jeopardizing his life and freedom. Director Oliver Stone masterfully portrays the complex moral dilemma Edward Snowden faced. On the one hand, he felt a duty to his country and the oath he had taken as an employee of the CIA and NSA. On the other hand, he was concerned about the ethical implications of mass surveillance and believed that the American people had a right to know about the invasion of their privacy. This film makes you think about important issues of national security, privacy and the role of government in the digital age. Joseph Gordon-Levitt's performance as Snowden is brilliant and he manages to convey the character's redemption and internal struggle.
In my opinion, the film has successfully become a great way of bringing attention to the story of Edward Snowden in an accessible manner. However, there were some issues that stood out to me while watching the film.First of all, the pacing seems to be all over the place. The director clearly wanted to showcase all the facets of Snowden’s life that led him to his decision; however, the flashback method used in the film has the narrative “jump” from one one year to another, in no particular order. This made the pacing at times a bit confusing and hard to follow. Another issues I had with the movie was the way relationship of Snowden and Lindsay Mills was portrayed. I believe that the movie does not particularly succeed in making their relationship developed and believable. That’s why some moments that meant to be heart-wrenching weren’t as effective. If we speak about the positives, I believe that the lead actor’s performance was outstanding, especially when we see the real Snowden at the end of the movie. Joseph Gordon-Levitt truly embraced the role and managed to make the viewer with Snowden. Moreover, this film helps to humanise Snowden. It makes the audience see him just a regular person who fought for what he thought was right.
In his film, Oliver Stone raises the issue of the balance between national security and human freedoms. Using the example of the biography of Edward Snowden, although in an exaggerated form, the director focuses on illegal methods of mass surveillance in the United States of America. The film clearly demonstrates Oliver Stone's political position - the United States is a hegemonic country that monitors most countries in the world. The US government can turn off the lights in Japan or blackmail the government of Brazil. One can say that Oliver Stone alludes to the question: “Does the United States have the right to call itself a democracy infringing on the freedoms of its citizens and the entire world?”.While viewing the film, the audience constantly experiences the feeling of being watched by the so-called “big brother”. Stone managed to create a tense atmosphere and the viewer empathizes with the main character. However, the picture is quite politicized. Stone creates an image of “independent journalism”, as if opposing some “kind of evil” in the person of the American government.
It was interesting. And surprisingly I have watched this film before. I was dreaming about becoming hacker and watched plenty films on that topic. The problem is that I’m not that plodding, I don’t like to stay home, it’s hard to me to keep doing 1 thing for a long period of time. I am a chaotic person and I’m good at everything but not the best at anything.thought was right.
Snowden is a gripping film that delves into the problem of government surveillance and the role of whistleblowers.The film captures the tension between national security and individual privacy, raising important questions about the limits of government surveillance. The film's portrayal of the complexity of Edward Snowden's motives and the consequences of his actions was both thought-provoking and deeply moving.
I enjoyed the movie, as it provided a unique perspective on the surveillance policies of the United States. The film has exceptional acting, skilled direction and a thrilling narrative focused on risk, commitment and the pursuit of truth. After watching it I realized how relevant the issue of mass surveillance in today's world is, affecting everyone around the globe. What made the film particularly compelling was its basis in real events, provoking us to reflect not only on cybersecurity, but also on personal values and priorities. Edward Snowden's courageous act left a deep impression on me, as he chose to confront not only his own interests but also the interests of society at large, despite personal sacrifice. Besides, I was struck by the extent of the surveillance systems used by the US, which go beyond surveillance of adversaries to include allies, serving as a means to influence and gaining advantage in negotiations. I figured out that terrorism serves mostly as a pretext for the U.S. government, while the true motives are related to economic and social control.
Great acting, brilliant director and a thrilling story about risk, dedication and the truth.
A very well made movie that tackles important political topics and sheds light on the mass information debacle a few years back.
An excellent film adaptation of the story of a man who was not afraid to renounce his life's work for the sake of justice.
I enjoyed the film since it managed to portray the evolution of Snowden views and the reasons why he decided to leak the secrets of his own government.I think the case of Snowden should be looked into more thoroughly in the age of global cyber threats and cyber espionage. This film definitely has helped in this case.
The film masterfully navigates through Snowden's journey, from his initial patriotic aspirations to his eventual disillusionment and act of whistleblowing. The tension between his sense of duty to his country and his growing concern for civil liberties creates a compelling narrative arc that kept me engaged throughout. Overall, "Snowden" is a thought-provoking and timely film that sheds light on one of the most significant whistleblowing events in recent history. It serves as a poignant reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties in an increasingly digital world.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Cyber espionage is not the fight against terrorism. It is a struggle for economic and social control, and you protect not the citizens but the superiority of your state.”
"If you choose the wrong way, the world will not notice anything"
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"The Internet is a technology that has the power to let everyone in the world understand each other."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"One man can stop the motor of the world." (“Atlas Shrugged”, Ayn Rand)
"Privacy is not about something to hide. It's about something to protect”
“Sometimes we're restricted from telling the whole truth. Doesn't give us permission to lie”
“Wait, so we're collecting twice as much in the U.S. as we are in Russia?“
Without the information to start the public debate we are loss. The people being able to question our government and hold it accountable that is the principle the US was founded on. So, if we want to protect our national security, we should be protecting that principle.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
“The truth sinks in that no matter what justification you're selling yourself, this is not about terrorism. Terrorism is the excuse. This is about economic and social control. And the only thing you're really protecting is the supremacy of your government”
There's something going on in the government that's really wrong and I can't ignore it. I just want to get this data to the world. I feel like I'm made to do this and if I don't do it, I don't know anybody else that can. I can't turn back from this.
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
It’s just going to get worse for the next generation, as they extend the capabilities of this sort of architecture of oppression
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
Ed: You’re just buying into what one side is saying.Lindsay: Maybe I am, cause my side is right.Ed: See, that’s funny, cause my side is right!
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Went from driving Cadillacs to driving convoys in Iraq."
"Snowden played a very important role in educating the american people to the degree in which our civil liberties and our constitutional rights are being undermined”