Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!
COMPARATIVE TABLE
Erica Collin
Created on March 23, 2023
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Fill in the Blanks
View
Museum Flipcards
View
Image Comparison Slider
View
Microcourse: Key Skills for the Professional Environment
View
The Meeting Microlearning
View
The Meeting Microlearning Mobile
View
Corporate Who's Who
Transcript
COMPARATIVE TABLE FOR RESEARCH METHODS
The advantages and disadvantages of three key research methods and recommendations for when to do each one.
INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS
FOCUS GROUPS
SURVEYS
Focus groups promote open communication, deeper thinking, and can reduce the power imbalance between participant and researcher.
When using surveys, research questions will work towards proving or mitigating their hypothesis with their own generated questions .
Interviews create complex, detailed responses from participants and allow in-depth questions to be asked.
ADVANTAGES
Focus groups have a limited scope — they provide information only about the experiences of participants that they can share in a group setting.
Interviews can seem intrusive to participants and also require a large time commitment for detailed questions.
Surveys present some limitations including non-responses, wording misunderstandings, and formatting confusion.
DISADVANTAGES
Focus groups are useful for learning a lot of specific information about what members of a community think and how their experiences compare.
Surveys are useful when conducting research of a large group to understand a topic more generally. Interviews and focus groups are beneficial to obtain more details.
Individual interviews are useful with a small group of people and the goal is to obtain detailed, personal, and complex information.
WHEN TO USE