Wikipedia Verified

WIKIPEDIA VERIFIED

axe:

Savoir, Création & Innovation

sous-axe:

Production & Circulation des Savoirs

notion:

Wikipedia is a platform of different studies, create in January 15, 2001.

Wikipedia is in the Top 5 in siteweb in the world, and even is the largest and the most popular general reference work on the internet.

This name represents the fact that "Wiki" is a management system of content on a website, and the "Pedia" come from the word encyclopedia. The difference of both, that was encyclopedia is a book, where we found on a library, contrary to wikipedia, where we found free on internet.

Wikipedia is certain of one of the best website but it is still highly criticized. Because anyone can add some study and even add some troll, and then distort the truth.

"Encyclopedia", Jeff Koterba

N1:

This document represents the both categorie of age, where we can see their different sources to found some studies. The first with know that wikipedia, who is only in internet and the second, encyclopedia, who is the book of wikipedia. I choose this document, because i appreciate to see the different categorie of age and their point of view.

A popular, yet controversial website

n2:

This document is a interview of the Roman's routine, who is not consider like a normal teenager, because when he back from school, instead of going in social network, he goes on his computer to add and edit some content on wikipedia. He consider this like a job and thank to this, he becomes an administrator for wikipedia. This document also talk about accessibility of anyone can change some information and even false them.

i choose this one because, we can see that a teenager like me can become an administrator at his age and that all teenager are different.

"Bias problem", Jackie Koerner

n3:

This document talk about problem of space management on wikipedia. The problem was that Wikipedia put men like a category, and women in a small one. Consequently, this can hurt women because they can feel less important than men. Also, they can discouraged, because they thinks their work are not reprensented as not legitimate and this is a men's job. i choose this document because, i disagree how Wikipedia categorized women and even give back that women are not legitime to do some things because she is a women.

Wikipedia: What Wikipedia is not

n4:

This document is a study, who talk about what is Wikipedia, who come from of Wikipedia himself. This talk about of what Wipidedia is not, with some exemple, who is not a dictionary or also is not a cristal ball, so can't predict the future. This highlights the limit of Wikipedia and what he can't do. I choose this document, because i think its interisting to see the limits even with things obvious like is not a blog, but some people thinks it is.