Group D
Research Paradigms
Start
1. Quantiative Research
Table of Contents
2. Qualitative Research
3. Mixed Methods Research
4. References
Read me for instructions
Quantitative Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
Qualitative Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
Mixed Methods Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590914789 Creswell, J. W. & Creswel, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870 Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033007014 Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 3(11), 474–498. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1663&context=tqr/
References
Pettus-Davis, C., Grady, M. D., Cuddeback, G. S. & Scheyett, A. (2011). A Practitioner’s Guide to Sampling in the Age of Evidence-Based Practice: Translation of Research into Practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2004-22201 Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 3–50). Sage.
Group D Research Paradigm Illustration
Megan Benay
Created on November 9, 2022
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Blackboard Presentation
View
Genial Storytale Presentation
View
Historical Presentation
View
Psychedelic Presentation
View
Memories Presentation
View
Animated Chalkboard Presentation
View
Chalkboard Presentation
Explore all templates
Transcript
Group D
Research Paradigms
Start
1. Quantiative Research
Table of Contents
2. Qualitative Research
3. Mixed Methods Research
4. References
Read me for instructions
Quantitative Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
Qualitative Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
Mixed Methods Research
Purpose
Design
Advantages/Disadvantages
Questions
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590914789 Creswell, J. W. & Creswel, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870 Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033007014 Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 3(11), 474–498. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1663&context=tqr/
References
Pettus-Davis, C., Grady, M. D., Cuddeback, G. S. & Scheyett, A. (2011). A Practitioner’s Guide to Sampling in the Age of Evidence-Based Practice: Translation of Research into Practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2004-22201 Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 3–50). Sage.