2022
The impacts of integrating Computer Aided Architectural Design "CAAD" with Computational thinking "CT" on Architectural Design "AD" in Academia.
By: Deliana Nawaf AlsahawnehSupervisor: Prof. Dr. Saleem Dahabreh
start
00
Index
Presentation Contents
Background
Relevance & Value
01
05
Context
Importance
Problem Statement
Methodology
02
06
& Focus
Prtocol Analysis, Think Aloud Method,Questionnaire, Interviews
Hypotheses
Results
03
07
Conclusions & Recommendations
Limitations
Aim & Objectives
04
08
Drawbacks
This study is part of never-ending studies demonstrating the association between computers and Architectural Design (AD) where it is of massive interest to architects to know how computer technology can have and still affect the way they think and work, their productivity, and time management. Early questions about whether computers help might limit architectural creativity have been answered strongly in the negative - in some aspects. Computers support a lot of today's architectural ingenuity.However, some studies superficially indicate some negative aspects of using computers. But first, it is important to clarify what we mean by “computers”; a design tool (i.e. computation) or a drafting tool (i.e. computerization)
01
background
Context
“How can we apply the computer to architecture?” is dangerous, naive, and foolish. (Alexander 1964, p. 54)
"Computers have come to stay; .." (Sudbo, B. 1988)
We are in danger of creating a generation of young architects who are highly skilled with computer software and yet have little visual sensibility" (Lawson, 2005)
Over the past six decades, the positive impacts of Computer Aided Architectural Design (CAAD) have been extensively investigated in many aspects, unfortunately, there is not enough structure in the literature addressing the negatives particularly in terms of time and productivity.
Today's generations of CAAD users, particularly architects in Academia, are misusing them owing to a lack of awareness of the difference between computation and computerization regrettably, because they have not been taught that.
Therefore, architects may not capture what CAAD may constitute to architecture, thus wasting their time actually in routinizing processes interactions, and exposed to a set of negative consequences!
02
Problem statement
& Focus
03
02
01
Students always use computers as Computerization rather than Computation
The faulty use of logic and application of the difference between Computation and Computerization
The expected negative impacts, because of inaccurate implementation, on time, productivity and performance
03
Hypotheses
04
Aim & Objectives
Aim
Objectives
Provide a brief of:
- CAAD;
- Architectural Design;
- Computational Thinking.
Find out how can computation and computerization affect architects’ thoughts, productivity, and time management – positively and negatively.
Seek what capacities can be unfolded when integrating computational design into practicing design in Academia.
01
02
03
Explore what negative effects of using "CAAD" in Architectural design "AD" in Academia.
05
Relevance & Value
Importance
Prtocol Analysis, Think Aloud Method,Questionnaire, Interviews
PRAGMATISM
QUESTIONNAIRE
PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
INTERVIEWS
WHAT WORKS
Confirming Verifications
Testing Skills
QUALITATIVE
QUANTITATIVE
General information
Linking facts
Yes / No Questions
EXPLORATORY
Behavioural
Recalling
Pause and Choose!
You thought! You did!
Call to mind
EXPERIMENTAL APPLIED
Situational And Hypothetical
Taxonomy
What if & how?
Stretching knowledge
SAMPLE : 65
60
THINK ALOUD METHOD
Concurrent protocol
TRANSANA
Retrospective protocol
EXCEL
SPSS
ALL IN
ACADEMIA CONTEXT
3 STUDENTS3rd year 4th year 5th year
SAMPLE : 65
1 TEACHER ASSISTANT
1 ACADEMIA INSTRUCTOR
07
Results
Conclusions & Recommendations
A comprehensive view of CAAD features.
Employing becomes a race.
The old method of hand drafting is losing its crucial significance.
The relationships that should exist between students and instructors.
The importance of sketching
A better understanding of my design Expressing and materializing my design ideas Communicating with others Understanding design requirements Strengthen my concept Identifying problems easily & successfully Exploring multiple geometries Thinking of multiple design solutions Saving time Getting well-presented designs Getting comprehensive designs Getting fully successful designs
- Uncertainty.
- The speed with which designers' intentions shift.
- The development time.
- The time needed to learn and use more than one program.
- The time needed for editing and rendering.
- Time needed proposing multiple options, losing by choice given advantages of a program, not using computers properly, and regaining the lost sense of scale. It is also essential to know when to (start and stop) i.e. work time.
It is TIME- CONSUMING
04
03
02
01
Software utilized
Design studios
Design
Instructors
before CAADing
+ Info
+ Info
+ Info
+ Info
The educational method used in school contexts chosen for the study
The methodological limits of protocol studies are represented in the time necessary not only for analysis but also for data collecting
Obtaining design protocols
with the same or similar degree of verbal/visual quality is difficult
Participants who found it difficult to think aloud while designing
attracting students interested in adopting the experience & adopting CAAD for designing
08
Limitations
Drawbacks
2022
The impacts of integrating Computer Aided Architectural Design "CAAD" with Computational thinking "CT" on Architectural Design "AD" in Academia.
By: Deliana Nawaf AlsahawnehSupervisor: Prof. Dr. Saleem Dahabreh
END
Write an awesome title here
9,280
A great title
17,520
A great title
Contextualize your topic with a subtitle
A great title
Title here
A great subtitle
Title here
A great subtitle
Title here
A great subtitle
The impacts of integrating Computer Aided Architectural Design "CAAD"
deliana sahawneh
Created on October 31, 2022
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Essential Dossier
View
Essential Business Proposal
View
Essential One Pager
View
Akihabara Dossier
View
Akihabara Marketing Proposal
View
Akihabara One Pager
View
Vertical Genial One Pager
Explore all templates
Transcript
2022
The impacts of integrating Computer Aided Architectural Design "CAAD" with Computational thinking "CT" on Architectural Design "AD" in Academia.
By: Deliana Nawaf AlsahawnehSupervisor: Prof. Dr. Saleem Dahabreh
start
00
Index
Presentation Contents
Background
Relevance & Value
01
05
Context
Importance
Problem Statement
Methodology
02
06
& Focus
Prtocol Analysis, Think Aloud Method,Questionnaire, Interviews
Hypotheses
Results
03
07
Conclusions & Recommendations
Limitations
Aim & Objectives
04
08
Drawbacks
This study is part of never-ending studies demonstrating the association between computers and Architectural Design (AD) where it is of massive interest to architects to know how computer technology can have and still affect the way they think and work, their productivity, and time management. Early questions about whether computers help might limit architectural creativity have been answered strongly in the negative - in some aspects. Computers support a lot of today's architectural ingenuity.However, some studies superficially indicate some negative aspects of using computers. But first, it is important to clarify what we mean by “computers”; a design tool (i.e. computation) or a drafting tool (i.e. computerization)
01
background
Context
“How can we apply the computer to architecture?” is dangerous, naive, and foolish. (Alexander 1964, p. 54)
"Computers have come to stay; .." (Sudbo, B. 1988)
We are in danger of creating a generation of young architects who are highly skilled with computer software and yet have little visual sensibility" (Lawson, 2005)
Over the past six decades, the positive impacts of Computer Aided Architectural Design (CAAD) have been extensively investigated in many aspects, unfortunately, there is not enough structure in the literature addressing the negatives particularly in terms of time and productivity.
Today's generations of CAAD users, particularly architects in Academia, are misusing them owing to a lack of awareness of the difference between computation and computerization regrettably, because they have not been taught that.
Therefore, architects may not capture what CAAD may constitute to architecture, thus wasting their time actually in routinizing processes interactions, and exposed to a set of negative consequences!
02
Problem statement
& Focus
03
02
01
Students always use computers as Computerization rather than Computation
The faulty use of logic and application of the difference between Computation and Computerization
The expected negative impacts, because of inaccurate implementation, on time, productivity and performance
03
Hypotheses
04
Aim & Objectives
Aim
Objectives
Provide a brief of:
Find out how can computation and computerization affect architects’ thoughts, productivity, and time management – positively and negatively.
Seek what capacities can be unfolded when integrating computational design into practicing design in Academia.
01
02
03
Explore what negative effects of using "CAAD" in Architectural design "AD" in Academia.
05
Relevance & Value
Importance
Prtocol Analysis, Think Aloud Method,Questionnaire, Interviews
PRAGMATISM
QUESTIONNAIRE
PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
INTERVIEWS
WHAT WORKS
Confirming Verifications
Testing Skills
QUALITATIVE
QUANTITATIVE
General information
Linking facts
Yes / No Questions
EXPLORATORY
Behavioural
Recalling
Pause and Choose!
You thought! You did!
Call to mind
EXPERIMENTAL APPLIED
Situational And Hypothetical
Taxonomy
What if & how?
Stretching knowledge
SAMPLE : 65
60
THINK ALOUD METHOD
Concurrent protocol
TRANSANA
Retrospective protocol
EXCEL
SPSS
ALL IN
ACADEMIA CONTEXT
3 STUDENTS3rd year 4th year 5th year
SAMPLE : 65
1 TEACHER ASSISTANT
1 ACADEMIA INSTRUCTOR
07
Results
Conclusions & Recommendations
A comprehensive view of CAAD features.
Employing becomes a race.
The old method of hand drafting is losing its crucial significance.
The relationships that should exist between students and instructors.
The importance of sketching
A better understanding of my design Expressing and materializing my design ideas Communicating with others Understanding design requirements Strengthen my concept Identifying problems easily & successfully Exploring multiple geometries Thinking of multiple design solutions Saving time Getting well-presented designs Getting comprehensive designs Getting fully successful designs
It is TIME- CONSUMING
04
03
02
01
Software utilized
Design studios
Design
Instructors
before CAADing
+ Info
+ Info
+ Info
+ Info
The educational method used in school contexts chosen for the study
The methodological limits of protocol studies are represented in the time necessary not only for analysis but also for data collecting
Obtaining design protocols with the same or similar degree of verbal/visual quality is difficult
Participants who found it difficult to think aloud while designing
attracting students interested in adopting the experience & adopting CAAD for designing
08
Limitations
Drawbacks
2022
The impacts of integrating Computer Aided Architectural Design "CAAD" with Computational thinking "CT" on Architectural Design "AD" in Academia.
By: Deliana Nawaf AlsahawnehSupervisor: Prof. Dr. Saleem Dahabreh
END
Write an awesome title here
9,280
A great title
17,520
A great title
Contextualize your topic with a subtitle
A great title
Title here
A great subtitle
Title here
A great subtitle
Title here
A great subtitle