Gujarat Rural Roads (MMGSY)
Mira K
Created on September 19, 2022
The objective is to improve the rural road connectivity (by providing all weather connectivity) to 1,060 villages in all the 33 districts in Gujarat state benefitting about 8 million people.
Over 30 million people create interactive content in Genially.
Check out what others have designed:
10 SIGNS A CHILD IS BEING BULLIED
Horizontal infographics
BEYONCÉ
Horizontal infographics
ALEX MORGAN
Horizontal infographics
ZODIAC SUN SIGNS AND WHAT THEY MEAN
Horizontal infographics
GOOGLE - SEARCH TIPS
Horizontal infographics
OSCAR WILDE
Horizontal infographics
NORMANDY 1944
Horizontal infographics
Transcript
Status: Approved
E&S-Category: B
2017 - 2019
India
Gujarat Rural Roads (MMGSY)
CONCEPT REVIEW
LOAN CLOSURE
June 30, 2019
March 13, 2017
FINANCING APPROVAL
July 4, 2017
FINAL REVIEW
May 17, 2017
LATEST FIELD VISIT
January 2020
Timeline
GoG
US$ 329 mln
AIIB
US$ 329 mln
Total Project Costs
US$ 658 mln
- Women did not get any new employment opportunities, and the project has not promoted women's livelihoods or asset building.
- Work sites did not have gender-safe bathrooms or housing facilities for women workers.
- Neither AIIB nor R&BD and LASA have a gender expert; AIIB does not have a gender policy.
- Women face sexual harassment.
- Women are being hired only at the lowest unskilled levels in AIIB-funded projects, and there is no provision for skill upgradation or to create a befitting match between the educational background of the women and the kind/quality of work they are asked to handle
Safeguard Concerns:
- MMGSY fails to provide equal, safe, decent jobs, and there are no records of any kind to show they have been hired, are working, or are being paid.
- The project reinforced gender inequalities and violated labour and human rights, especially those of tribal peoples.
- Field research found that labor conditions at visited work sites esembled forced labor.
Safeguard Concerns:
- Construction workers, a majority of whom were of tribal origin and lower caste, systematically had their rightsviolated.
- Project documents fail to explicitly mention social, historical, cultural, and tribally relevant processes which could be utilized to identify and address local barriers to gender inclusivity.
- Although the training LASA led touched upon tribal and gender issues, they were offered too late to benefit women during project implementation.