Improving Fluid Intelligence with training on working memory
2008
Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, John Jonides and Walter J. Perrig
Start!
5- Participants and Procedure
3- Link to Working Memory
2- Previous Research
4- Present Study
1- What is Fluid Intelligence?
index
7- Results
10- Thanks
6- Materials
9- My Thoughts
8- Discussion
Fluid intelligence refers to the ability to reason and to solve new problems independently of previously acquired knowledge
- Jaeggi et al. (2008)
+ Info
What is Fluid Intelligence?
- A complex human ability that allows us to adapt our thinking to a new cognitive problem or situation.
- Important for a wide variety of cognitive tasks and is considered one of the most important factors in learning.
- Closely related to professional and educational success.
- Robust against against influences of education and socialisation.
- Commonly seen as having a strong hereditary component.
Back
Previous Research
Interest in computer and video games possibly increasing IQ (Smith et al.; Haier et al.). - No empirical evidence found. - Nothing beyond task-specific performance and selective Visio-spatial attention.
2003
1997
Cognitive training in psychological and educational science (Healy et al.). - Performance on trained tasks can increase. - Transfer of learning to other tasks/domains remains rare.
Increasing performance in Gf tests by simply practicing the tests themselves (Bors & Vigneau). - Decreases novelty. - Decreases underlying Gf-processes.
Use of "smart drugs" to investigate any drug-related increase in Gf (Elliot et al.; Kimberg et al.) - No evidence of such increase has been found till date.
2006
1999
Back
Link to Working Memory
- Halford et al. proposed a framework for a transfer study in which Gf can be improved via a working memory task.
- Working memory and intelligence share a capacity constraint.
- Capacity constraint expressed by the number of items that can be held in working memory or the number of interrelationships among elements in a reasoning task.
- Gf and working memory are related through attentional control processes.
- Carpenter et al. proposed that the ability to derive abstract relations and to maintain a large set of possible goals in working memory accounts for individual differences in typical tasks that measure Gf.
- Both Gf and working memory rely on similar neural networks; lateral and parietal vortices.
Back
Present Study
Improving Fluid intelligence with training on working memory
By Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, John Jonides and Walter J. Perrig
+ Info
Present Study
Aim: Investigate the effects of training on the working memory task and its impact on Gf. Four individual experiments using a newly developed training paradigm consisting of a demanding working memory task. Important difference among the four experiments was the number of training sessions between pre and post-tests, ranging from 8 to 19 sessions. Hypotheses: Any alteration of the processing system would take some time to be effective.
Methods
Participants and Procedure
- Sample: 70 young participants (36 female, 34 male) recruited from the University of Bern.
- 35 participants performed the working-memory task in four different settings- one participant failed to complete training sessions and was excluded (n = 34)
- Control for retest effects; performance of trained groups were matched with four control groups who did not recieve training (n = 35). Control groups recieved pre and post-testing at the same intervals as the trained groups.
- Training groups: 8 days, 12 days, 17 days and 19 days.
- Pre-tested participants on a measure of Gf and then post-tested them on another form of this measure.
- In each training setting, participants trained daily, except for the weekends.
- Post-test took place at least 1 day after the last trainng session.
+ Info
Materials
Dual n-back task: Squares at eight different locations are presented sequentially on a computer screen at a rate of 3 s. Simultaneously, one of eight consonants will be presented sequentially through headphones. A response is required when one of the presented stimuli matched the one presented n positions back in the sequence. - 6 auditory and 6 visual targets per block. Transfer Task: Standardised fluid intelligence tests consisting of visual analogy problems of increasing difficulty was presented. Each problem presented a matrix of patterns in which one pattern is missing and the task is to select the mission pattern among a set of given response alternatives. 8 day training group -> Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices test, set II (35) 12, 17 & 19 day training groups -> Bochumer Matrizen-test (36) Reading Span and Digit Span Tasks: To control for individual differences and gain in working memory capacity; conducted pre and post-test sessions.
Results
Results
- Analyses of the training functions revealed that all four training groups improved in their performance on the working memory task comparably.
- Dramatic improvement on the test of Gf in the trained groups.
- Analysis of the gain scores (post-test minus pre-test) as a function of training time showed that transfer to fluid intellgence varied as a function of training time.
- Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a trend for group differences after 12 days, and statistically significant group differences after 17 and 19 training days.
- Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences between:
8 vs. 17 days, 8 vs. 19 days and 12 vs. 19 days.
Discussion
Discussion
An impressive learning curve for the training task in all four experiments. Indicated participants were challenged to improve their performance even after a training time as long as 4 weeks. Training related gain in Gf- not been reported previously. The adaptive character of the training leads to continual engagement of executive processes while only minimally allowing the development of automatic processes and task-specific strategies- engages Gf related process. Transfer task shares important features with the training task- strong relationship between working memory and Gf due to involvement of attentional control. Training procedure may have have facilitated the ability to control attention.
My Thoughts
My Thoughts
Methods: - larger samples required - only adult participants- same for clinical sample?
Useful: - incorporated in schools - better future prospects
Novel Finding: - replicate findings- further research
Research: - can build on this hypothesis
Index
Thanks!
Improving Fluid Intelligence with Training on Working Memory
Kaynaat Tanveer
Created on April 17, 2022
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Blackboard Presentation
View
Genial Storytale Presentation
View
Historical Presentation
View
Psychedelic Presentation
View
Memories Presentation
View
Animated Chalkboard Presentation
View
Chalkboard Presentation
Explore all templates
Transcript
Improving Fluid Intelligence with training on working memory
2008
Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, John Jonides and Walter J. Perrig
Start!
5- Participants and Procedure
3- Link to Working Memory
2- Previous Research
4- Present Study
1- What is Fluid Intelligence?
index
7- Results
10- Thanks
6- Materials
9- My Thoughts
8- Discussion
Fluid intelligence refers to the ability to reason and to solve new problems independently of previously acquired knowledge
- Jaeggi et al. (2008)
+ Info
What is Fluid Intelligence?
Back
Previous Research
Interest in computer and video games possibly increasing IQ (Smith et al.; Haier et al.). - No empirical evidence found. - Nothing beyond task-specific performance and selective Visio-spatial attention.
2003
1997
Cognitive training in psychological and educational science (Healy et al.). - Performance on trained tasks can increase. - Transfer of learning to other tasks/domains remains rare.
Increasing performance in Gf tests by simply practicing the tests themselves (Bors & Vigneau). - Decreases novelty. - Decreases underlying Gf-processes.
Use of "smart drugs" to investigate any drug-related increase in Gf (Elliot et al.; Kimberg et al.) - No evidence of such increase has been found till date.
2006
1999
Back
Link to Working Memory
Back
Present Study
Improving Fluid intelligence with training on working memory
By Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, John Jonides and Walter J. Perrig
+ Info
Present Study
Aim: Investigate the effects of training on the working memory task and its impact on Gf. Four individual experiments using a newly developed training paradigm consisting of a demanding working memory task. Important difference among the four experiments was the number of training sessions between pre and post-tests, ranging from 8 to 19 sessions. Hypotheses: Any alteration of the processing system would take some time to be effective.
Methods
Participants and Procedure
+ Info
Materials
Dual n-back task: Squares at eight different locations are presented sequentially on a computer screen at a rate of 3 s. Simultaneously, one of eight consonants will be presented sequentially through headphones. A response is required when one of the presented stimuli matched the one presented n positions back in the sequence. - 6 auditory and 6 visual targets per block. Transfer Task: Standardised fluid intelligence tests consisting of visual analogy problems of increasing difficulty was presented. Each problem presented a matrix of patterns in which one pattern is missing and the task is to select the mission pattern among a set of given response alternatives. 8 day training group -> Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices test, set II (35) 12, 17 & 19 day training groups -> Bochumer Matrizen-test (36) Reading Span and Digit Span Tasks: To control for individual differences and gain in working memory capacity; conducted pre and post-test sessions.
Results
Results
- Analyses of the training functions revealed that all four training groups improved in their performance on the working memory task comparably.
- Dramatic improvement on the test of Gf in the trained groups.
- Analysis of the gain scores (post-test minus pre-test) as a function of training time showed that transfer to fluid intellgence varied as a function of training time.
- Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a trend for group differences after 12 days, and statistically significant group differences after 17 and 19 training days.
- Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences between:
8 vs. 17 days, 8 vs. 19 days and 12 vs. 19 days.Discussion
Discussion
An impressive learning curve for the training task in all four experiments. Indicated participants were challenged to improve their performance even after a training time as long as 4 weeks. Training related gain in Gf- not been reported previously. The adaptive character of the training leads to continual engagement of executive processes while only minimally allowing the development of automatic processes and task-specific strategies- engages Gf related process. Transfer task shares important features with the training task- strong relationship between working memory and Gf due to involvement of attentional control. Training procedure may have have facilitated the ability to control attention.
My Thoughts
My Thoughts
Methods: - larger samples required - only adult participants- same for clinical sample?
Useful: - incorporated in schools - better future prospects
Novel Finding: - replicate findings- further research
Research: - can build on this hypothesis
Index
Thanks!