12 ANGRY MEN PRESENTATION

START

12 angry men

Introduce

• Released in 1957

• Thriller/conflict and justice

index

1. Details of the boy

7. Deliberations

2. Real crime facts

8. Conclusion

3. Alleged facts by the boy

4. Alleged facts by the jurors

5. Witness – old man

6. Witness – women

Details of the boy

• Since 5 y-o : dad beated regularly

• 9 y-o : mom died

• Live in the slum

• 1 year and a half in the orphanage + dad in prison

• 15 y-o : stoled a car + knife fights

• During the case → 16 y-o

Real crime facts

10 PM : back home

8 PM : fight between father and son

12.10 PM : father is killed with a switch knife

8.45 PM : meet his friends until 9.45 PM

Alleged facts by the boy (TIMELINE)

3.10 AM : Return home + father died

11.30 PM : Went to movie

Between 11.30 PM and 3.10 AM : Lost the knife

Alleged facts by the jurors (TIMELINE)

12.10 PM : Stabbed his father + wiped the knife + left home

Boy stayed home + fight with his father

3.10 AM : Back home

Witness – old man

• About 75 y-o
• 12.10 PM : ' I'm gonna killed you ' + body hit the floor
• 15 secondes to the door + saw the boy
• During the killing → elevated train goes by

Witness – women

• 45 y-o
• 8 PM : went to bed
• 12.10 PM : turn the side + saw the murder
• Elevated train → last 2 chariots
• Screamed + call the police

FIRST VOTE

• Juror n°8 : not guilty
• Juror n°1 : testimony + guilty.
• Juror n°2 : facts, which are irrefutable
• Juror n°3 : testimony + comes from a slum = a dangerous person
• Juror n°4 : testimony
• Juror n°5 : pass his turn
• Juror n°6 : just convinced
• Juror n°7 : just convinced + testimony + only one copy of this knife
• Juror n°8 : exactly identic copy of the crime weapon

SECONDE VOTE

• Juror n°8 : doesn't vote

• Debate of the old man testimony

• After several hypothesis a new vote is called

THIRD VOTE

"If he killed his father, why did he came back home?"

Juror n°8

• Women testimony

FOURTH VOTE

• Testimony of the old man
• Juror n°8 asks for the apartment diagram

fifth vote

• Redebate about the boys trip to the cimena
• Reconstitution of the murder (inclination of the knife + wound)

sixth vote

"Why did you change your mind ?"

Juror n°11 to Juror n°7

seventh vote

• Redebate about the womans testimony

• Hypothesis : her testimony can be 100% certain

last vote

• Juror n°8 asks Juror n°3 for his arguments

• Juror n°3 flustered himself before changing his vote to NOT GUILTY

CONCLUSION

THANKS FOR LISTENING