Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!

Get started free

Field-oriented control of a permanent magnet synchronous motor

Shaeeza Adam

Created on November 20, 2021

Start designing with a free template

Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:

Higher Education Presentation

Psychedelic Presentation

Vaporwave presentation

Geniaflix Presentation

Vintage Mosaic Presentation

Modern Zen Presentation

Newspaper Presentation

Transcript

MOTOR CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE APPLICATIONS

FINAL PRESENTATION

Student: Shaeeza Adam (217020963) Supervisor: A. K. Saha

Date 24-11-2021

OVERVIEW

7. References

1. Introduction

4. Simulations

5. Demonstration

2. Theoretical Framework

6. Conclusion

3. Specifications

1. inTRODUCTION

Problem Identification

  • Transportation is a need in modern societies [1-3]
  • Gasoline fuelled vehicles solve this problem but are not sustainable [1-3]
  • Rising environmental awareness creates the need for a greener solution [1-3]
  • The electric vehicle was developed as a solution to the need for a more environmentally friendly solution to the transportation requirements of society [2-4]
  • Motor control is one of the significant aspects in electric vehicle design [1-5]
  • This design aims to oversee the control strategy implemented to EV motors [1 -4]

Write a subtitle here

2. Theoretical Framework

The System Design

  • Three most popular EV motors in 2018: IM, PM synchronous motor and Switched reluctance motor [4-8].
  • Three high efficiency control strategies were considered: FOC, DTC and field weakening control [3-5].

Figure 1: System diagram of a battery electric vehicle [2-4]

Solution One: Direct Torque Control (DTC)

The Alternate Solution

Figure 2: Block diagram of direct torque control on PMSM [1-2].

Solution Two: Field Oriented Control (FOC)

The Implemented Solution

Figure 3: Block diagram representation of field oriented control on PMSM [1-2].

3. sPECIFICATIONS

Vehicle Specifications

  • Selected vehicle: hatchback roughly based on Renault Zoe
  • Driven on motorways and in urban and suburban areas
  • Table 1: Vehicle parameters [9]

3. sPECIFICATIONS

Motor Specifications

Table 2: Motor specifications [9]

Table 2: Motor parameters [9]

Figure 3: Force diagram of vehicle [8]

3. sPECIFICATIONS

Battery and Peripherals Specifications

Table 3: Inverter specifications [2]

  • 400 V lithium ion battery pack is selected to deliver a peak voltage of 266.7 V
  • Controller must have an efficiency of at least 90%
  • No significant oscillations must be present

4. SImULAtION

Plant Model

Figure 4: Plant model on Simulink [3-5] [8-12]

Plant Model

10

Figure 6: Inverter results

Figure 5: SVPWM results

Vehicle Model

Figure 7: Vehicle model

11

5. DemOnStRATION

OBJECTIVES

The following objective were identified and met during the course of this project:

Achieved

  • Speed control using a drive cycle input in km/h
  • Efficiency of at least 90%
  • Maximum overshoot/undershoot of 10%
  • No significant oscillations under constant velocity regions

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

12

6. ConCLUSION

Motor Control Techniques in EV Applications

  • FOC control of PM synchronous motors in electric vehicles
  • Speed controller achieved a greater efficiency than current controller
  • Efficiency of 93.74% was achieved
  • All design objectives were achieved according to the developed specifications

13

8. ReFeRenCES

[1] G. A. Covic, J. T. Boys, M. L. G. Kissin, and H. G. Lu, “A three-phase inductive power transfer system for roadway-powered vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 3370–3378, Dec. 2007. [2] S. Delprat, T. M. Guerra, and J. Rimaux, “Control strategies for hybrid vehicles: synthesis and evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 58th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC ’03), vol. 5, pp. 3246–3250, October 2003. [3] A. F. Burke, “Batteries and ultracapacitors for electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 806–820, Apr. 2007. [4] C. W. Tao and J.-S. Taur, “Flexible complexity reduced PIDlike fuzzy controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B: Cybernetics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 510–516, 2000. [5] A. Brahma, B. Glenn, Y. Guezennec, T. Miller, G. Rizzoni, and G. Washington, “Modeling, performance analysis and control design of a hybrid sport-utility vehicle,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA ’99), pp. 448–453, Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA, August 1999. [6] H.-D. Lee, E.-S. Koo, S.-K. Sul, and J.-S. Kim, “Torque control strategy for a parallel-hybrid vehicle using fuzzy logic,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 33–38, 2000. [7] S. Galichet and L. Foulloy, “Fuzzy controllers: synthesis and equivalences,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 1995. [8] S. D. Farrall and R. P. Jones, “Energy management in an automotive electric/heat engine hybrid powertrain using fuzzy decision making,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp. 463–468, Chicago, Ill, USA, August 1993. [9] M. Ehsani, Y. Gao, and J. M. Miller, “Hybrid electric vehicles: architecture and motor drives,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 719–728, 2007. [10] C. C. Chan and K. T. Chau, “An overview of power electronics in electric vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–13, Feb. 1997. [11] S. Pathak and R. Prakash, “Development of high-performance AC drive train,” in Proc. IEEE ICEHV, 2006, pp. 1–3. [12] S. S. Williamson, A. Emadi, and K. Rajashekara, “Comprehensive efficiency modeling of electric traction motor drives for hybrid electric vehicle propulsion applications,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1561–1572, Jul. 2007.

14

Thanks for you attention

Any question?