est. 2019
Evaluation Models
Compare and Contrast
1. 17 Step Framework 2. Users must be identified and engaged at the beginning of the process 3. Users guide all decisions of the evaluation process 4. Can be used for different types of evaluations (formative, summative, process, impact)
UtilizationFOCUSED Evaluation
SIMILARITIEs
Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
1. Four Level Training Model 2. Designed to objectively measure the effectiveness of training 3. The model is over 60 years old and some termiology might be outdated 4. Levels 3 and 4 time-consuming, resource-intensive, and expensive to implement.
1. Can improve training in the future2. Collaborative nature of evaluation
Christine McLaurin
subtitle here
Evaluation Model Compare and Contrast
christine.ruth.mclaurin
Created on November 19, 2020
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Squares Diagram
View
Customer Journey Map
View
HR Organizational Chart
View
SWOT PRO
View
Branching diagram
View
Fishbone Diagram
View
Puzzle Diagram
Explore all templates
Transcript
est. 2019
Evaluation Models
Compare and Contrast
1. 17 Step Framework 2. Users must be identified and engaged at the beginning of the process 3. Users guide all decisions of the evaluation process 4. Can be used for different types of evaluations (formative, summative, process, impact)
UtilizationFOCUSED Evaluation
SIMILARITIEs
Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
1. Four Level Training Model 2. Designed to objectively measure the effectiveness of training 3. The model is over 60 years old and some termiology might be outdated 4. Levels 3 and 4 time-consuming, resource-intensive, and expensive to implement.
1. Can improve training in the future2. Collaborative nature of evaluation
Christine McLaurin
subtitle here