est. 2019
Evaluation Models
Compare and Contrast
1. 17 Step Framework 2. Users must be identified and engaged at the beginning of the process 3. Users guide all decisions of the evaluation process 4. Can be used for different types of evaluations (formative, summative, process, impact)
UtilizationFOCUSED Evaluation
SIMILARITIEs
Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
1. Four Level Training Model 2. Designed to objectively measure the effectiveness of training 3. The model is over 60 years old and some termiology might be outdated 4. Levels 3 and 4 time-consuming, resource-intensive, and expensive to implement.
1. Can improve training in the future2. Collaborative nature of evaluation
Christine McLaurin
subtitle here
Evaluation Model Compare and Contrast
christine.ruth.mclaurin
Created on November 19, 2020
Start designing with a free template
Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:
View
Timeline Diagram
View
Timeline Diagram 3
View
Timeline Diagram 4
View
Timeline Diagram 2
View
Triangle Diagram 3
View
Color Shapes SWOT
View
Lean Business Canvas
Explore all templates
Transcript
est. 2019
Evaluation Models
Compare and Contrast
1. 17 Step Framework 2. Users must be identified and engaged at the beginning of the process 3. Users guide all decisions of the evaluation process 4. Can be used for different types of evaluations (formative, summative, process, impact)
UtilizationFOCUSED Evaluation
SIMILARITIEs
Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
1. Four Level Training Model 2. Designed to objectively measure the effectiveness of training 3. The model is over 60 years old and some termiology might be outdated 4. Levels 3 and 4 time-consuming, resource-intensive, and expensive to implement.
1. Can improve training in the future2. Collaborative nature of evaluation
Christine McLaurin
subtitle here