Want to create interactive content? It’s easy in Genially!

Get started free

Linguistics

Tomas Gonzalez

Created on April 13, 2020

Start designing with a free template

Discover more than 1500 professional designs like these:

Math Lesson Plan

Primary Unit Plan 2

Animated Chalkboard Learning Unit

Business Learning Unit

Corporate Signature Learning Unit

Code Training Unit

History Unit plan

Transcript

Cognitive Linguistics

START

Outline

5. Metaphoric Thought

4. Metonymic Thought

1. Introduction

2. Categorization of Experience

3. Framing Knowledge

6. Image-Schematic Understanding

7. Figure-Ground Alignment in Grammar

8. Scope of Attention

9. Mental Spaces

10. Cognitive Grammar

1. Introduction

  • What distinguishes cognitive linguistics from other kinds of linguistics is the attempt to describe and explain language use with reference to a number of cognitive processes.
  • Cognitive liunguistics is a scientific endeavor to account for the meaningfulness of human experience, be it linguistic, social, cultural, or whatever.

2. Categorization of Experience

To have a conceptual category

Human meaning making depends on how we categorize

The membersofthe category must share certain essensial features

  1. Entities
  2. Events

Fillmore, Lackoff and Tayloroffered a new option

The classical view of categories is based on the idea of essential features

+ info

2. Categorization of Experience

Prototype Categorization Become the cornerstone of Cognitive linguistics.

Applies to three levels

  1. Everyday concepts
  2. Sense of words
  3. linguistics concepts

John Austin extended the notion of categories to the sense of words

The categories have an internal structure that is organized around prototypes

Central

Non Central

3. Framing Knowledge

  • Categories are mentally represented as frames, schemas, or models.
  • A frame is a structured mental representation of a coherent organization of human experience.
  • World is the product of some prior categorization and framing by ourselves and others.
  • Different individuals can interpret the “same” reality in different ways.

4. Metonymic Thought

Metonymy is a cognitive process

Kovecses and Radden

A conceptiual element (thing, event, property) provides mental acces to another conceptual entity within the same idealized cognitive model ICM

the target

the vehicle

Our knowledge of the world comes from:

  1. Structured frames
  2. Schemas
  3. ICMs

This can be constitued as a whole with parts

+ info

4. Metonymic Thought

Categories themselves have a part-whole structure

The Category and Property Frame

The Category and Property ICM

The Category and Member ICM

The whole category stands for a member

A property can stand fot the entire category.

The properties used to define the category.The categories as a whole has properties as parts.

+ info

+ info

+ info

5. Metaphoric Thought

A metaphor is a cognitive process

In wich one domain of experience (A ) is understood in terms of another domain of experience (B).

Metaphor = source (B) + target domain (A)

Conceptual metaphors are motivated by:

  1. Embodiment
  2. Similarity

Life (source) is a more physical whileJourney (target) is a more abstract kind of domain.

6. Image-Schematic Understanding

ohnson defines it as a dynamic patter of our perceptual interactions

Image schemas function as the foundation of thoughts. You should consider the following points to demostrate how they perform it.

The container image-schema

The source-path-goal schema

The image-schema of force

6. Figure-ground alignment in grammar

It has to do with how we talk about spatial relations in language. We talk about how one entity is positioned with respect to another entity. The figure-ground alignment is an asymmetrical relation. The figure should come first in the sentence, followed by the ground.

"The bike is near the house"

bike = figure house = ground

+ info

7. Figure-Ground Alignment in Grammar

This feature involves not only static relation but also spatial relation in which one entity moves in relation to another.

Complex sentences can be construed in terms of figure-ground alignment

the main clause corresponds to the figure

the subordinate clause to the ground.

  • I read while she sewed = asymmetrical relation
  • I read and she sewed = symmetrical relation

8. Scope of Attention

It is the peripherial area of attention

The focus and scope of attention have consequences for the grammaticality of senteces

A finger has three knuckles anda fingernail. A body has twenty eight knuckles Knuckle has as its immediate scope: the hand and the finger

8. Scalar Adjustment

We can have a coarse-grained or a fine-grained view of the same situation:She ran across the field. (coarse-grained) She ran through the field. (coarse-grained)

The notion of scalar adjustment has to do with how closely we attend to the details of the scene. This aspect was studied extensively by Talmy

Scalar adjustment is not limited to visual experience only. We can say: “John’s being silly,” fine-grained= John’s silliness is temporary “John’s silly.” it is his permanent personality

8. Dynamic and Static Attetion

Our attention can scan a scen: Statically or Dynamically

Langacker:

Talmy

Fictive motion allows to view this scene dinamically, as if it ere moving

Dynamic Situations are constitued by means of sequential scanning

"The road windst hrough the valley and then climbs over high mountains"

"The Boston Bridge collapsed"

The two kinds of scanning are usedby languages to distinguish things and relations

9. Mental Spaces

It is a key idea in cognitive linguistic approaches to the understanding of how people make sense of utterances in the course of online communication

Fauconnier

The girl with blue eyes has green eyes. In the picture, the girl with blue eyes has green eyes.

There are two mental spaces here

  • The mental space of reality, as we represent it to ourselves. (Base space)
  • The mental space of the picture, as we perceive it. (Model space)

10. Cognitive Grammar

A Sketch of Cognitive Grammar

Linguistic signs have been defined as pairings of form and meaning.

They include not just words but other units of language

Cognitive Grammar

Grammar is a complex cognitive system that organizes and with meaning the way we communicate with each other.The theory of constructions in grammar goes against the still dominant view of grammar — generative grammar.

They are extended “horizontally,” including bound morphemes (like -ed), fixed expressions like , how are you?, and idioms like add fuel to the fire, .

They are extended “vertically” in cognitive linguistics . Words = word classes (Noun)The combinations of words = general syntactic categories and phrases, such as DET + N = NP (noun phrase),

Cognitive grammar is essentially a construction grammar in this sense, where constructions are form-and-meaning pairs

Bibliography

shttp://seas3.elte.hu/VLlxx/kove cses.html

01

02

Fillmore (1982), Lakoff & Taylor (1987)

03

Kovecses and Radden 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: Panther & Radden 1999: 17–59.

04

Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100

05

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Thank you!